Hi Daniel,
Dne 28.05.2024 (tor) ob 19:23 +0200 je Daniel Gröber napisal(a):
> I'm not super happy with the approach of putting git-subrepo.d inside
> /usr/share/git-subrepo tbh. I might be able to let it pass but it seems
> lintian found another issue that needs patching anyway so you may as well
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 12:38 AM Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> Merged the two commits
> https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/opam/-/merge_requests/10
>
\o/. Thanks.
> let me know once you have something that passes pipelines then!
Yeah, now I am trying to address another regression on repr
Hello, I did upload the package, but for some reasons
uscan --debug --force-download
creates a different tarball with respect to the one on pristine-tar branch
I used the upstream one, please check and explain your import workflow, because
I can't understand why your name is on the files:
ls -l
On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 11:51 PM Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> Hello, I did upload the package, but for some reasons
>
> uscan --debug --force-download
> creates a different tarball with respect to the one on pristine-tar branch
>
> I used the upstream one, please check and explain your import w
Hello,
>hmm, what is wrong with me? My import workflow is below:
>1. git clone xx.git(I forked this one)
>2. gbp pq import
>3. gbp import-orig --pristine-tar --uscan
>4. gbp pq rebase
>5. gbp pq export
>6. commit to master then push
My workflow is:
1. git clone
2. uscan --debug
3. gbp import-orig
5 matches
Mail list logo