Bug#1060385: RFS: imsprog/1.1.4-1 [ITP] -- friendly greeter

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "imsprog":     Package name : imsprog     Version  : 1.1.4-1     Upstream contact : Mikhail Medvedev e-ink-rea...@yandex.ru     URL  : https://github

Bug#1060388: RFS: endless-sky/0.10.4-0.1 [NMU] [RC] -- space exploration, trading and combat game

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "endless-sky": * Package name : endless-sky Version : 0.10.4-0.1 Upstream contact : Michael Zahniser * URL : https://endless-sky.github.io * License

MIT license vs Expat license in packages

Dear Mentors, According to https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/, the link at the top of generated copyright files, "There are [many versions of the MIT license](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License#Various_versions). Please use Expat instead, when it matches.

Bug#1060391: RFS: selint/1.5.0-1 -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: selinux-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "selint": * Package name : selint Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream contact : Daniel Burgener * URL : https://git

Re: MIT license vs Expat license in packages

Hi, >If I wanted to package software licensed under MIT, and the version given >upstream matches the Expat license word-for-word, does the above sentence mean >I should replace all references to the MIT license with Expat? Yes. > Should my copyright file look like this? No. The MIT block and

Re: MIT license vs Expat license in packages

Hi, > No. The MIT block and references should be gone (unless some files use a > different version of the MIT license). Perfect. Thank you. Regards, David James

Bug#1060391: marked as done (RFS: selint/1.5.0-1 -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Jan 2024 23:08:40 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: selint/1.5.0-1 -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies has caused the Debian Bug report #1060391, regarding RFS: selint/1.5.0-1 -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux poli

Bug#1060250: marked as done (RFS: snapd-glib/1.63-5.1 [NMU] -- GLib snapd library (installed tests))

Your message dated Wed, 10 Jan 2024 23:52:15 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: RFS: snapd-glib/1.63-5.1 [NMU] -- GLib snapd library (installed tests) has caused the Debian Bug report #1060250, regarding RFS: snapd-glib/1.63-5.1 [NMU] -- GLib snapd library (installed tests) to be marked a