Dear Mentors,
I am trying to build a multiarch package (ITP #1055706) for debian on a
raspberry pi. The package builds fine, however, there is a lintian error
like so:
*Output from *debuild*:*
dpkg-deb: building package 'libmagicenum-dev' in
'../libmagicenum-dev_0.9.3-1_all.deb'.
dpkg-genb
I just realized that I misread the error message. My apologies. It seems
to be expecting all instead of arm64. So how might I build it for all?
On 11/11/23 7:36 pm, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
Dear Mentors,
I am trying to build a multiarch package (ITP #1055706) for debian on
a raspberry pi
Hi Shriram,
debian/control file has a field "architecture". By default it's set to "any".
Try setting it to "all"
On November 11, 2023 7:46:05 PM GMT+05:30, Shriram Ravindranathan
wrote:
>I just realized that I misread the error message. My apologies. It seems to be
>expecting all instead of
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2023 15:29:41 +0100
with message-id <205cb646-f023-4a31-bbbc-c721f8184...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: python-gradientmodel/0.0.2-1 [ITP] -- Gradient Model
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054987,
regarding RFS: python-gradientmodel/0.0.2-1 [ITP] -- Gradien
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 07:36:07PM +0530, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
> dpkg-deb: building package 'libmagicenum-dev' in
> '../libmagicenum-dev_0.9.3-1_all.deb'.
[...]
> E: libmagicenum-dev: triplet-dir-and-architecture-mismatch is for arm64
> instead of all [usr/lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/]
So you
Thank you, that seems to have resolved it. I changed it to arch:any and
multiarch:same.
On 11/11/2023 20:10, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 07:36:07PM +0530, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
dpkg-deb: building package 'libmagicenum-dev' in
'../libmagicenum-dev_0.9.3-1_all.deb
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Marc,
On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 03:03:02PM +0200, Marc Leeman wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> * Package name : openvpn3-client
>Version : 20+dfsg-1
>Upstream contact : OpenVPN Solutions LLC
> * URL : https://openvpn.net/
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi liudun,
the package tracker does not list you as uploader, so I wonder if this
upload has been discussed with the packaging team beforehand?
(please remove the moreinfo tag when that has been clarified)
--
tobi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: kd8...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "a2d":
* Package name : a2d
Version : 2.0.3-2
Upstream contact : Yogeswaran Umasankar
* URL : https://github.com/NGC2023/a2d
*
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:24:13AM +0100, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name : qnetload
>Version : 1.3.6-1
(Review of Upload #3 Uploaded: 2023-10-25 23:09)
- autopkgtests: thanks f
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2023 20:42:15 +0100
with message-id <5b7c16cd-291c-451a-b87c-7b662143d...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: RFS: python-disptrans/0.0.1-1 [ITP] --
Dispersion-Compensated Algorithm
has caused the Debian Bug report #1054918,
regarding RFS: python-disptrans/0.0.1-1 [ITP]
On 2023-11-11 19:36 +0530, Shriram Ravindranathan wrote:
> when I run dpkg --print-architecture it says arm64 but when I run the
> command arch it says aarch64.
> Am I doing something wrong here? how do I get it to build for aarch64?
Just to clarify your confusion:
arm64 is the debian (and kernel)
Hi,
On 11 Nov 2023 at 18:07:24, Tobias Frost wrote:
Thanks very much for reviewing the package.
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:24:13AM +0100, Carles Pina i Estany wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name : qnetload
> >Version : 1.3.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zope.event":
* Package name : zope.event
Version : 5.0-1
Upstream contact : Zope Foundation and Contributors
* URL : https://github.com/zopefoundation/zope.
Your message dated Sat, 11 Nov 2023 23:53:55 -0500
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1055798: RFS: a2d/2.0.3-2 -- APRS to DAPNET portal
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055798,
regarding RFS: a2d/2.0.3-2 -- APRS to DAPNET portal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
15 matches
Mail list logo