Bug#994556: marked as done (RFS: cpp-httplib/0.9.7+ds-1 [ITP] -- C++ HTTP/HTTPS server and client library)

Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:25:12 +0100 with message-id <63835e22-083c-6bc5-12c7-019f01804...@debian.org> and subject line Re: RFS: cpp-httplib/0.9.7+ds-1 [ITP] -- C++ HTTP/HTTPS server and client library has caused the Debian Bug report #994556, regarding RFS: cpp-httplib/0.9.7+ds-1 [I

Re: cppcheck: Incorrect minimum version requirement for Depends: on libc

Hi, On 19.11.21 18:35, Joachim Reichel wrote: I'd appreciate some help with a problem I don't understand. Bug #1000146 against cppcheck 2.6-1 (in testing and unstable) is about the fact that /usr/bin/cppcheck seems to require "libc6 >= 2.32" while the Depends: line in the binary package cppch

Bug#1000324: RFS: ghostwriter/2.1.0-1 -- Distraction-free, themeable Markdown editor

P.S. Yes, these methods aren't mutually exclusive; they can be combined. I was just trying to keep things simple ;-) signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1000324: RFS: ghostwriter/2.1.0-1 -- Distraction-free, themeable Markdown editor

Hi Sebastien, Sebastien Chavaux writes: > > Thank you first of all. So it's not that I don't want to maintain git / > salsa, it's that I'm not comfortable with it, should do a remedial course > on it. > I also found git hard to start out with. The first thing I noticed that all documentation se

Bug#981030: RFS: sctk/2.4.10-20151007-1312Z+dfsg2-4 -- speech recognition scoring toolkit

Am 22.11.21 um 16:10 schrieb Giulio Paci: I guess the main reason for this weird behavior is described in (option -mfpmath): https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-10.3.0/gcc/x86-Options.html#x86-Options and in (option

Bug#996653: RFS: dynarmic/5+git20211012.cce7e4e+ds-1 [ITP] -- ARMdynamic recompiler

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 23.11.21 21:48, Andrea Pappacoda wrote: On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 18:13:10 +0100 Andrea Pappacoda wrote: > > FTBFS on arm64: > > This makes me think that arm64 host support is still incomplete. Until > it released as stable by upstream, I think it's better to disable

Re: cppcheck: Incorrect minimum version requirement for Depends: on libc

Hi Joachim, Joachim Reichel writes: > Hi, > > On 19.11.21 18:35, Joachim Reichel wrote: >> I'd appreciate some help with a problem I don't understand. >> >> Bug #1000146 against cppcheck 2.6-1 (in testing and unstable) is about the >> fact >> that /usr/bin/cppcheck seems to require "libc6 >=