Bug#981546: RFS: toxic/0.10.1-1 -- curses Tox based instant messenging client

2021-02-01 Thread Gürkan Myczko
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "toxic": * Package name: toxic Version : 0.10.1-1 Upstream Author : JFreegman * URL : https://github.com/JFreegman/toxic * License : GPL-3+, CC-BY-3.0

Re: Platformer game package - "Super Bombinhas"

2021-02-01 Thread Victor David Santos
Hi Paul, Thanks for the detailed feedback. Just to make sure, not all of these items you pointed out are mandatory for the package to be accepted, right? For example, the fact that my font image doesn't support all character sets. It's not viable for me to make it support all of them, instead I wo

Re: Platformer game package - "Super Bombinhas"

2021-02-01 Thread Victor David Santos
Oh, sorry, I have another question... The Gosu library is not owned by me, so how would I proceed to have it packaged for Debian? Is it really necessary, considering that it's a Ruby gem, publicly available from rubygems.org? Thanks again, Victor Em seg., 1 de fev. de 2021 às 08:36, Victor David

Bug#981563: RFS: stacer/1.1.0+ds-1 -- Linux system optimizer and monitoring

2021-02-01 Thread Gürkan Myczko
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stacer": * Package name: stacer Version : 1.1.0+ds-1 Upstream Author : Oguzhan Inan * URL : https://github.com/oguzhaninan/Stacer/ * License : UNLICE

Bug#981030: RFS: sctk/2.4.10-20151007-1312Z+dfsg2-4 -- speech recognition scoring toolkit

2021-02-01 Thread Giulio Paci
Hi Adam, thank you for your review. Il mar 26 gen 2021, 03:02 Adam Borowski ha scritto: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:05:24PM +0100, Giulio Paci wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of the package "sctk" > > > > * Package name: sctk > >Version : 2.4.10-2

Re: Platformer game package - "Super Bombinhas"

2021-02-01 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 08:36 -0300, Victor David Santos wrote: > Thanks for the detailed feedback. Just to make sure, not all of these > items you pointed out are mandatory for the package to be accepted, > right? All of the points I made are my personal opinions. There are a range of different ap