Bug#970712: RFS: libcxx-serial/1.2.1-2 [RC] -- Cross-platform, Serial Port library written in C++ (runtime)

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: reopen -1 On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:29:58AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > Hi again, > > On 24/09/2020 09:07, Alec Leamas wrote: > > > >> "/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/pkgconfig" > > > I have made a new upload, only changing the last reference. Will make a > > comme

Bug#970696: One more change

I included one more change to cross build with nocheck.

Bug#970859: RFS: picom/8.1-1 -- lightweight compositor for X11

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "picom": * Package name: picom Version : 8.1-1 Upstream Author : Yuxuan Shui * URL : https://github.com/yshui/picom * License : Expat, MPL-2.0, Expat a

Bug#970858: RFS: dunst/1.5.0-1 -- dmenu-ish notification-daemon

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dunst": * Package name: dunst Version : 1.5.0-1 Upstream Author : Nikos Tsipinakis * URL : https://dunst-project.org/ * License : BSD-3-clause, ISC *

Bug#970712: RFS: libcxx-serial/1.2.1-2 [RC] -- Cross-platform, Serial Port library written in C++ (runtime)

On 24/09/2020 10:34, Tobias Frost wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > Control: reopen -1 > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:29:58AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: >> Hi again, >> >> On 24/09/2020 09:07, Alec Leamas wrote: > (Looking at the -dev package: they use a quite common filename (serial.h) > wit

Bug#970696: closing 970696

close 970696 thanks

Bug#970696: One more change

Uploaded! (Many thanks for ITSing)

Bug#970859: marked as done (RFS: picom/8.1-1 -- lightweight compositor for X11)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Sep 2020 17:02:09 +0300 with message-id <20200924140209.ga7...@tsipinakis.com> and subject line RFS: picom/8.1-1 -- lightweight compositor for X11 has caused the Debian Bug report #970859, regarding RFS: picom/8.1-1 -- lightweight compositor for X11 to be marked as done.

schroot behaves different than pbuilder (Was: Bug#963392: [Help] Re: r-cran-rstanarm: FTBFS: error: (converted from warning) TBB library not found.)

Hi, the short version of this question is how can it be that pbuilder seems to "eat" some '-L' in front of a linker option in r-cran-rstan[1] to make the build fail in pbuilder (see below) while Shayan confirmed schroot is able to build the package nicely? Kind regards Andreas. [1] htt