Hello,
i start with a new package where i have to repackage the source code.
The source code include libraries.
What is the right naming?
I know +dfsg for license reason.
but what is the definition for +ds or +repack or something else.
I alreada read
*
[[https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/de
Hi Mechtilde,
If you removed some non-free files from the original tarball,
a "+dfsg" suffix should be used, and the deleted files should
be annotated in debian/copyright.
If you removed some redundant files already provided by another
package, or added some convenient copy of something, "+ds"
wo
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 04:27:10PM +0200, Mechtilde Stehmann wrote:
> https://wiki.debian.org/Repackaging
The common term for this is "repacking", not "repackaging".
Repackaging sounds like something related to packaging.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Mattia,
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:45:50PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, 4:31 pm Marc Haber,
> wrote:
> > To enable a feature I need, upstream suggests
> > cmake -D METEREXEC_ROOTACCESS=true .
> >
> > Where would I add this?
>
>
> override_dh_auto_configure:
> dh_au
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 09:24:09PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 04:45:50PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > The way to go with that would be for you to set DH_VERBOSE, notice *which*
> > tool issue a particular command (in this case it's _confugure, not _build),
> > then know
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 12:12:02AM +0200, Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "xlog"
>
> * Package name: xlog
>Version : 2.0.17-1
>Upstream Author : Andy Stewart KB1OIQ
>
6 matches
Mail list logo