Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cryptodev-linux"
* Package name: cryptodev-linux
Version : 1.10-1
Upstream Author : Michal Ludvig and the rest of authors
* URL : http://cryptodev-linux.org/
*
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dunst"
Package name: dunst
Version : 1.4.1-1
Upstream Author : Sascha Kruse
URL : https://dunst-project.org/
License : BSD 3-clause
Section : x11
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-8-doc"
* Package name: gcc-8-doc
Version : 8.3.0-1
Upstream Author : FSF
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
* License : GFDL-1.2+, GFDL-1.3+, GPL-2+, GPL-3+
Your message dated Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:52:00 +0200
with message-id <20190703155200.ga1...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#931377: RFS: gcc-8-doc/8.3.0-1 [put in ITP, ITA, RC,
NMU if applicable]
has caused the Debian Bug report #931377,
regarding RFS: gcc-8-doc/8.3.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as don
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:00:27PM +0300, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> ср, 3 июл. 2019 г. в 18:52, Adam Borowski :
> > It's a pity neither Guo nor you managed to update the docs before Buster,
> > but 1. we can upload this to buster-backports soon,
>
> Should I do anything manually to do this
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:59:04 +0100 Philipp Meisberger
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-fingerprint"
>
> * Package name: python-fingerprint
>Version : 1.5
>Upstream Autho
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 02:40:30AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
One issue is the watch file being empty (save for comments). If
there's
nothing inside, it should be deleted. But, for a Github project that does
sane release, it's too trivial to fill it instead:
Done, but since I use pristine-t
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-doc-defaults"
* Package name: gcc-doc-defaults
Version : 5:18
* URL : http://gcc.gnu.org/
* License : GNU-meta-license
Section : doc
It builds
Your message dated Thu, 4 Jul 2019 01:32:02 +0200
with message-id <20190703233202.ga18...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#930595: RFS: uacme/1.0.15-2 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #930595,
regarding RFS: uacme/1.0.16-7 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Hello,
I am a newcomer for package maintaining. I'm currently working on packaging a
program [1] that uses CMake and requires some build dependencies, in this case
both cmake and gatb-core which has fortunately been already packaged as
libgatbcore-dev. I have created a patch file that is "meant
On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 9:09 AM Shayan Doust wrote:
> I have created a patch file that is "meant" to use the system-installed
> libgatbcore-dev instead of a submodule that comes with the project on github.
If you haven't already, please try to get the patch or something
similar included upstream
Hello,
Just writing in to ask if you get a chance to test the package again.
The debian/control file is updated according to Debian Sid (unstable) and the
package was pushed to https://mentors.debian.net/package/fossology.
Please let me know if I am missing something in the package.
With best
Hello,
On 2019-07-04 03:58, he...@shayandoust.me wrote:
> Even though I had verbosity set, the message still didn't make sense. I tried
> to copy out the project from my working (root) directory and try to "cmake ."
> it manually with the build dependencies installed on my system, and it seems
13 matches
Mail list logo
