Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cavestory-nx"
* Package name: cavestory-nx
Version : 1.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://gitlab.com/coringao/cavestory-nx
* Li
Hi,
> * License : BSD-2-Clause
> Section : non-free/games
Huh?
-nik
On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 09:18:58AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 10:44 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
>
> > Looks like the project code was updated for s/HITS_DB/DAZZ_DB/ but the
> > DAZZ_DB submodule snapshot was not updated. Ask the upstream.
>
> This sounds like an embedded
Hi mentors,
I'm trying to find the best solution for a package renaming of pycryptodome.
This package exists for both python3 and python2. For simplicity, I will
talk only about python3 packages.
The package is not in stable.
Currently, we have in testing and unstable:
- python3-pycryptodome
- p
Hi,
> Maybe some parts are not BSD?
Yes, this package has other licenses included.
Thanks!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao]
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B638 B780
signature.asc
Descri
Your message dated Sat, 18 Aug 2018 13:41:53 +0200
with message-id <20180818114153.dxgqu5qipuv7s...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#906425: RFS: sleef/3.3-1 [ITP] -- vectorized math
library, pytorch deps.
has caused the Debian Bug report #906425,
regarding RFS: sleef/3.3-1 [ITP] -- vectorized
Hi,
>Sorry, is there anything wrong with being on the BSD-2-Clause license
>and the non-free/games section?
If it's BSD licenced, it's not non-free.
Maybe some parts are not BSD?
-nik
Hi,
> Huh?
Sorry, is there anything wrong with being on the BSD-2-Clause license and the
non-free/games section?
Thanks!
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Carlos Donizete Froes [a.k.a coringao]
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ - https://wiki.debian.org/coringao
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ GPG: 4096R/B638B780
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀ 2157 630B D441 A775 BEFF D35F FA63 ADA6 B
Your message dated Sun, 19 Aug 2018 04:26:12 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: fsdiff/0.3.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #906064,
regarding RFS: fsdiff/0.3.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
9 matches
Mail list logo