Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #896970 > 1. This package misses dependency libconfig-dev Added. > 2. Please fix the lintian warnings. e.g. > > W: odp-doc: privacy-breach-generic I will try to. Privacy breaches come from generated documentation. > 3. debhelper compat leve

Bug#897096: RFS: pytest-flask/0.10.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pytest-flask" * Package name: pytest-flask Version : 0.10.0-1 Upstream Author : Vital Kudzelka * URL : https://g

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #896970 Hi Lumin, I have uploaded next iteration of ODP package to mentors.d.n. It fixes all issues you have pointed out, except issues 5, 6, 10, 11. I'd like your advice wrt points 5 and 10 (we would like to keep virtual packages in place). For p

Bug#897119: RFS: fqterm/0.9.8.5-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-chinese...@lists.debian.org Dear mentors and Debian Chinese Team fellow developers, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fqterm". * Package name: fqterm Version : 0.9.8.5-1 Upstream Author : Iru Cai

Bug#896970: RFS: odp/1.19.0.0-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Followup-For: Bug #896970 For the reference I've uploaded a preview of ODP-DPDK 1.19.0.0 package to mentors.d.n. It features library and -dev packages, which provide libodp-linux119 and libodp-linux-dev packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid AP

Bug#896985: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.6-1)

Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:05:23 -0400 with message-id <87r2mzqbxo@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#896985: RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #896985, regarding RFS: nautilus-admin/1.1.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#896988: marked as done (RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-3)

Your message dated Sat, 28 Apr 2018 17:11:12 -0400 with message-id <87muxnqbnz@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#896988: RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #896988, regarding RFS: nautilus-hide/0.2.3-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#897119: marked as done (RFS: fqterm/0.9.8.5-1)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2018 01:25:26 +0200 with message-id <20180428232526.bwp3uj3np72qd...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#897119: RFS: fqterm/0.9.8.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #897119, regarding RFS: fqterm/0.9.8.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#896511: marked as done (RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-2)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2018 02:05:46 +0200 with message-id <20180429000546.b5lq4bogxrgah...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#896511: RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #896511, regarding RFS: spacefm/1.0.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#895261: RFS: dbus-broker/13-2 [ITP] -- Linux D-Bus Message Broker

retitle 895261 RFS: dbus-broker/13-2 [ITP] -- Linux D-Bus Message Broker stop Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my "dbus-broker" package * Package name: dbus-broker Version : 13-2 Upstream Author : David Herrmann et al. * URL : https://github.com/bus1/dbus

Bug#897077: marked as done (RFS: fcitx/1:4.2.9.6-2)

Your message dated Sun, 29 Apr 2018 02:29:45 +0200 with message-id <20180429002945.a4wos2dnuuk3d...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#897077: RFS: fcitx/1:4.2.9.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #897077, regarding RFS: fcitx/1:4.2.9.6-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th