Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:38:05 +
with message-id <0f1add24-c3b5-e01a-d2d3-9172f90ae...@visulytix.com>
and subject line uploaded to unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #880443,
regarding RFS: spyder-reports/0.1.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 13:24:09 + (UTC)
with message-id <124788531.3381894.1510665849...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#880049: RFS: btrfs-progs/4.13.3-1~bpo9+1 [continuing
to update the bpo]
has caused the Debian Bug report #880049,
regarding RFS: btrfs-progs/4.13.3-1~b
>Would it be possible to have someone look over the changes I've made
>and/or make suggestions as to how I could get these changes incorporated
>into Debian?
it is usually better to open wishlist bugs for improvements (with patches)
and then in case open an RFS bug.
Looks the new release is al
>Sorry to have bothered you. All answers are in
>https://mentors.debian.net/qa
I'm quite busy right now, good luck with mentors uploads :)
G.
Hi,
There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. But python-nmea2 already
exists.
https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html
I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with
an n-d...@bugs.debian.org but he sent -cl...@bugs.debian.org
to ITP only. RFS still open.
https://bugs.d
Christian Seiler writes:
> Am 2017-11-13 13:23, schrieb wf...@niif.hu:
>
>> I'm packaging a program which wants to dlopen() some library. It finds
>> this library via pkg-config (PKG_CHECK_MODULES). How to best determine
>> the filename to use in the dlopen() call? It should work cross-distro,
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:26:01 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pynmea2/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- pynmea2 is a Python
library for the NMEA 0183 protocol
has caused the Debian Bug report #871468,
regarding RFS: pynmea2/1.9.0-1 [ITP] -- pynmea2 is a Python library for the
N
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:26:00 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #858155,
regarding RFS: stenc/1.0.7-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2.
> But python-nmea2 already exists.
>
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html
>
> I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with
> an n-d...@bugs.debian.org bu
Hi Geert Stappers,
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2.
>> But python-nmea2 already exists.
>>
>> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html
>>
>> I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with
>> an n
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtkterm"
* Package name: gtkterm
Version : 0.99.7~rc1-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 10:19:27PM +0100, Willem van den Akker wrote:
> * Package name: gtkterm
> Version : 0.99.7~rc1-1
> Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> * URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
> * License : [fill in]
> Section
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:13:55PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> There was a ITP-RFS for pynmea2. But python-nmea2 already
> exists.
>
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-nmea2.html
>
> I asked the contributor (2017-11-12) to close the bugs with
> an n-d...@bugs.debian.org but he sent
13 matches
Mail list logo
