How to determine the filename for dlopen()

2017-11-13 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Hi, I'm packaging a program which wants to dlopen() some library. It finds this library via pkg-config (PKG_CHECK_MODULES). How to best determine the filename to use in the dlopen() call? It should work cross-distro, for cross-compilation and whatnot. Is it always safe to use the SONAME as the

Re: How to determine the filename for dlopen()

2017-11-13 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, Am 2017-11-13 13:23, schrieb wf...@niif.hu: I'm packaging a program which wants to dlopen() some library. It finds this library via pkg-config (PKG_CHECK_MODULES). How to best determine the filename to use in the dlopen() call? It should work cross-distro, for cross-compilation and whatno

Bug#881522: marked as done (RFS: fracplanet/0.4.0-6 [ITA])

2017-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:57:56 +0100 with message-id <20171113195756.36rrd444zrhmg...@sk2.org> and subject line Re: Bug#881522: RFS: fracplanet/0.4.0-6 [ITA] has caused the Debian Bug report #881522, regarding RFS: fracplanet/0.4.0-6 [ITA] to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#881644: RFS: codemirror-js/5.19.0

2017-11-13 Thread Gordon Ball
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal I am looking for a sponsor for a (team) update to codemirror-js. The current version in unstable is 5.4.0 (from July 2015). This update is not to the latest upstream version (currently 5.31.0), but to the most recent version (5.19.0, from September 2

Bug#880406: marked as done (RFS: python-bayespy/0.5.12-1)

2017-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:20:28 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: python-bayespy/0.5.12-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #880406, regarding RFS: python-bayespy/0.5.12-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#880405: marked as done (RFS: python-meshio/1.8.17-1)

2017-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:20:28 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: python-meshio/1.8.17-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #880405, regarding RFS: python-meshio/1.8.17-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#880412: marked as done (RFS: python-h5netcdf/0.5.0-1)

2017-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:20:26 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: python-h5netcdf/0.5.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #880412, regarding RFS: python-h5netcdf/0.5.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#880408: marked as done (RFS: python-pymeasure/0.5-1)

2017-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:20:28 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: python-pymeasure/0.5-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #880408, regarding RFS: python-pymeasure/0.5-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#880577: marked as done (RFS: shark/3.1.4+ds1-1 [RC])

2017-11-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 14 Nov 2017 04:20:26 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: shark/3.1.4+ds1-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #880577, regarding RFS: shark/3.1.4+ds1-1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is