ocaml not migrating?

2017-10-12 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi, since a few days, ocaml has the "Migration status: OK: Will attempt migration", but it does not migrate. https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ocaml Since I have a few packages depending on ocaml (namely plplot and its reverse dependencies, gnudatalanguage) which are set to AUTORM, I am wondering w

Re: ocaml not migrating?

2017-10-12 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:03:46AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi, > > since a few days, ocaml has the "Migration status: OK: Will attempt > migration", but it does not migrate. > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ocaml > > Since I have a few packages depending on ocaml (namely plplot and its >

Re: ocaml not migrating?

2017-10-12 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi Andrey, Andrey Rahmatullin writes: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:03:46AM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote: >> since a few days, ocaml has the "Migration status: OK: Will attempt >> migration", but it does not migrate. > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ocaml.html (I guess) I am wondering

Bug#878277: marked as done (RFS: nixnote2/2.0.2-2 [RC])

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:23:15 +0200 with message-id <20171012092315.rspdb73oc7i6l...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#878277: RFS: nixnote2/2.0.2-2 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #878277, regarding RFS: nixnote2/2.0.2-2 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#878245: marked as done (RFS: plopfolio.app/0.1.0-7)

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2017 11:28:35 +0200 with message-id <20171012092835.depomthl3abf2...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#878245: RFS: plopfolio.app/0.1.0-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #878245, regarding RFS: plopfolio.app/0.1.0-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#878206: marked as done (RFS: jamnntpd/1.3-1 - NNTP Server allowing access a JAM messagebase)

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 12 Oct 2017 23:48:09 +0200 with message-id <20171012214809.zq4sklfkendmp...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#878206: RFS: jamnntpd/1.3-1 - NNTP Server allowing access a JAM messagebase has caused the Debian Bug report #878206, regarding RFS: jamnntpd/1.3-1 - NNTP Server

Bug#878168: marked as done (RFS: dbuskit/0.1.1-3)

2017-10-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:10:30 +0200 with message-id <20171012221029.3pnixsirsaffw...@angband.pl> and subject line Re: Bug#878168: RFS: dbuskit/0.1.1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #878168, regarding RFS: dbuskit/0.1.1-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr