How to replace throw exceptions in C++11

2017-08-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I try to fix #872262 and while I've read that dynamic exception specifications are deprecated in C++11 I have not found a sensible replacement for the affected code. Any hint what to do here? Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: How to replace throw exceptions in C++11

2017-08-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:10:49AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > I try to fix #872262 and while I've read that dynamic exception > specifications are deprecated in C++11 I have not found a sensible > replacement for the affected code. > > Any hint what to do here? The report has a patch, have you

Re: How to replace throw exceptions in C++11

2017-08-25 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, Am 2017-08-25 10:10, schrieb Andreas Tille: I try to fix #872262 and while I've read that dynamic exception specifications are deprecated in C++11 I have not found a sensible replacement for the affected code. Any hint what to do here? The main issue with the code are not the exception sp

Bug#873180: RFS: node-cp/0.2.0-1 [ITP]

2017-08-25 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-cp" * Package name: node-cp Version : 0.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Mathieson * URL : https://github.com/stephenmathieson/node-cp * License

javalib-but-no-public-jars lintian

2017-08-25 Thread Felix Natter
hello mentors, I have this in an updated knopflerfish-osgi package: I: libknopflerfish-osgi-framework-java: javalib-but-no-public-jars N: N:The name of the package suggests that it contains a java library but it N:does not contain any JAR file in /usr/share/java, while the java policy N:

Re: How to replace throw exceptions in C++11

2017-08-25 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 11:57:25AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote: > > The patch in the bug report already disables -Werror - and that should > definitely be what you should use to build the package even after those > warnings have gone. Thanks for the long explanation which is helpful for th

Bug#873132: changelog entry updated

2017-08-25 Thread Adam Bilbrough
Hi,I have updated the entry to be more descriptive: * Adds '+' as an argument for specifying a line number (closes: #872848) The upload on mentors.debian.net has been updated with this included. ~Adam

Bug#873132: changelog entry updated

2017-08-25 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:17:34PM +0200, Adam Bilbrough wrote: > Hi,I have updated the entry to be more descriptive: > * Adds '+' as an argument for specifying a line number (closes: #872848) > The upload on mentors.debian.net has been updated with this included. Hi! I'm afraid that, just like xm

Bug#873113: RFS: xssproxy/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2017-08-25 Thread tim
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Should be fixed now. Regards, Tim Schumacher binY9y4mKtu2L.bin Description: PGP Public Key pgpo4yEL6qjad.pgp Description: PGP Digital Signature

Bug#873113: RFS: xssproxy/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2017-08-25 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
Please run lintian before uploading the package: W: xssproxy source: package-needs-versioned-debhelper-build-depends 10 -- WBR, wRAR signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#873113: RFS: xssproxy/1.0.0-1 [ITP]

2017-08-25 Thread tim
OK, should be fixed this time. Regards, Tim Schumacher bin91iUtqjpBo.bin Description: PGP Public Key pgpqCLCCzpvkD.pgp Description: PGP Digital Signature

Re: javalib-but-no-public-jars lintian

2017-08-25 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
>N:does not contain any JAR file in /usr/share/java, while the java policy my $is_transitional = $info->is_pkg_class('transitional'); if (!$has_public_jars && !$is_transitional && $pkg =~ /^lib[^\s,]+-java$/){ # Skip this if it installs a symlink in usr/share/java my $java_dir = $info->index_

Bug#873072: marked as done (RFS: xtensor/0.10.11-1)

2017-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:51:14 + (UTC) with message-id <1323633563.2967042.1503679874...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#873072: RFS: xtensor/0.10.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #873072, regarding RFS: xtensor/0.10.11-1 to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#873180: RFS: node-cp/0.2.0-1 [ITP]

2017-08-25 Thread Bastien Roucaries
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Why not use fs-extra ? Le 25 août 2017 13:06:06 GMT+02:00, Julien Puydt a écrit : >Package: sponsorship-requests >Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-cp" > > * Package name: node-cp > Version : 0.2

Bug#873180: marked as done (RFS: node-cp/0.2.0-1 [ITP])

2017-08-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Aug 2017 22:59:12 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#873180: RFS: node-cp/0.2.0-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #873180, regarding RFS: node-cp/0.2.0-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#873261: RFS: node-when/3.7.8+ds-1 [ITP]

2017-08-25 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Owner: Bastien Roucaries Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-when" * Package name: node-when Version : 3.7.8+ds-1 Upstream Author : Brian Cavalier * URL : https://github.com/cujojs/whe