control: tag -1 -moreinfo
On 2017-07-15 02:28, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> Here is a review of 534d41f:
Thank you for reviewing it.
> - I think we should list Dmitry in the Uploaders: field
Done
> - your git history does not really give credit to Dmitry for his work.
> I'd like to suggest start
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:20:28 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: mongovi/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #845710,
regarding RFS: mongovi/1.0.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the following package:
* Package name: parsedatetime
Version : 2.4-2
Upstream Author : Mike Taylor
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/parsedatetime
* License : Apache
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:51:53 -0700
with message-id <20170717175153.esrqib57vs44y...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#868088: RFS: sysbench/1.0.8+ds-1 -- multi-threaded
benchmark tool for database systems
has caused the Debian Bug report #868088,
regarding RFS: sysbenc
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:04:49 -0700
with message-id <20170717180449.ewwrpalhxrbue...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#851937: RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #851937,
regarding RFS: farbfeld/2.20170109-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Mon, 17 Jul 2017 11:11:35 -0700
with message-id <20170717181135.4ohj7ekiiil2q...@iris.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive RFS
has caused the Debian Bug report #860496,
regarding RFS: drgeo/1.1.0-10.3 [NMU, RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Hi,
I am currently adopting plplot [1], which included a simplification and
modernization of the build system (using modern debhelpers).
I now have the problem, that one of the shared libraries is probably not
detected correctly: "lintian" tells me
E: octave-plplot: unstripped-binary-or-object
What does file(1) return for this file?
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Howdy all,
How should I make library documentation available at a single obvious
location, for any of several binary packages of the library?
I am working on a package with the following dependencies::
Source: pyfoo
Package: python3-foo
Section: python
Suggests: python-foo-doc
Another update mainly to math upstream version. There should be no
functional difference in package performance. Some language files were
moved in order to better work with Python's packaging system.
You can download the new package here:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/weresync/were
10 matches
Mail list logo