Bug#866046: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.18-0.1 NMU

2017-06-27 Thread Thomas Pircher
On 2017-06-27 06:59, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Adam Borowski wrote: Please get an ok from the maintainer. this is true in general, unfortunately Chrisb is inactive since one year or so, and his last upload is around 5 years ago. Hi Adam, Gianfranco, thanks for looking into this. Apolo

Bug#866046: RFS: libcgicc/3.2.18-0.1 NMU

2017-06-27 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo > So, if you want I can take care of this one lets put the review in the bug: 1) please delete the two useless patches 2) the upstream tarball is... full of useless stuff they included a subtarball with 3.2.17 inside) this makes the debdiff look sc

Bug#866088: RFS: galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1

2017-06-27 Thread Boyuan Yang
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "galternatives" into *stable* (stretch-pu). * Package name: galternatives Version : 0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1 Upstream Author : [not active] * URL : [defunct] * Licen

Bug#866123: RFS: fbkeyboard/0.1-1 [ITP]

2017-06-27 Thread Julian Winkler
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fbkeyboard" * Package name: fbkeyboard Version : 0.1-1 Upstream Author : Julian Winkler * URL :https://github.com/julianwi/fbkeyboard * License : GPL S

Bug#864912: RFS: emacs-ivy/0.9.1+dfsg-1 [ITP]

2017-06-27 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 06:47:47AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello Nicholas, > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 07:58:54PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: > > Would you please upload src:emacs-ivy at commit 9776992 if there are > > no further outstanding issues? doc/ivy-ox.el should not be installed

Bug#866088: marked as done (RFS: galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1)

2017-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2017 18:11:58 +0200 with message-id <1836a1a1-3f30-401d-d0db-f0b416775...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#864757: stretch-pu: package galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #866088, regarding RFS: galternatives/0.13.5+nmu4+deb9u1 to be

Bug#866134: RFS: jajuk/1:1.10.9+dfsg2-3

2017-06-27 Thread Felix Natter
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, hello Markus, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jajuk". This fixes a simple classpath error reported against Ubuntu. * Package name: jajuk Version : 1:1.10.9+dfsg2-3 Upstream Author : Bertrand Florat and The

Bug#864428: RFS: bitfield/1.0.0-2 [ITP #864358]

2017-06-27 Thread Vitalie Ciubotaru
Thank you very much for your help and comments. > libbitfield$SOVERSION (shared library) > libbitfield-dev (development files) Done. Package name changed from 'bitfield' to 'libbitfield' and SOVERSION is set to 1, so we get: libbitfield1 libbitfield-dev > If you don't have soversioning in pl

Bug#866160: RFS: moka-icon-theme/5.3.6-1

2017-06-27 Thread foss.freedom
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moka-icon-theme" * Package name: moka-icon-theme Version : 5.3.6-1 Upstream Author : Sam Hewitt * URL : github.com/snwh/moka-icon-theme * License

Bug#866160: marked as done (RFS: moka-icon-theme/5.3.6-1)

2017-06-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Jun 2017 19:38:57 + (UTC) with message-id <1501357284.5662147.1498592337...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#866160: RFS: moka-icon-theme/5.3.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #866160, regarding RFS: moka-icon-theme/5.3.6-1 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#865560: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.6-1

2017-06-27 Thread Jason Crain
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:06:19PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexiv2" > > I sponsored in deferred/10, but I have some questions/nitpicks: > 1) you can consider having a debian/clean file instead of overriding dh_clean I will do this. > 2) di

watch file is present but does not work?

2017-06-27 Thread John Horigan
When I upload my package contextfree to mentors.debian.net, in the QA information I get this: A watch file is present but doesn't work -- Scanning for watchfiles in . -- Found watchfile in ./debian -- Scan finished My watch file looks like this: version=4 options="pgpsigurlmangle=s%$%.asc%,dversio

Re: watch file is present but does not work?

2017-06-27 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 04:56:52AM +, John Horigan wrote: > When I upload my package contextfree to mentors.debian.net, in the QA > information I get this: > A watch file is present but doesn't work > -- Scanning for watchfiles in . > -- Found watchfile in ./debian > -- Scan finished > > My wa

Bug#866193: RFS/ITP: node-universalify/0.1.0-1

2017-06-27 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-universalify" * Package name: node-universalify Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Ryan Zimmerman * URL : https://github.com/RyanZim/universalify *