Help needed for bcl2fastq

2017-06-22 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi folks, I have not even checked whether bcl2fastq EULA is fit for non-free but since we need it locally on more than one box I intend to at least inject the packaging into our Git[1] - may be its useful for somebody else or we can try to convince Illumina to use a free license. Anywaxy I have s

Bug#865515: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~20170614-1 [ITP]

2017-06-22 Thread vitalie
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pcc". The RFP for this package was first filed in 2007, there were some ITFs since that time, but apparently it has never been packaged. * Package name: pcc Version : 1.2.0~2

Bug#865560: RFS: gexiv2/0.10.6-1

2017-06-22 Thread Jason Crain
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gexiv2" * Package name: gexiv2 Version : 0.10.6-1 Upstream Author : Jens Georg * URL : https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/gexiv2 * License : GPL-2+ Se

Bug#865515: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~20170614-1 [ITP]

2017-06-22 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:48:49PM +0900, vita...@ciubotaru.tk wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pcc". The RFP for this package > was first filed in 2007, there were some ITFs since that time, but > apparently it has never been packaged. It was briefly in the archive: https://pa

Bug#863108: RFS: minecraft-installer/0.1-1 [ITP] -- Unofficial way to easily install Minecraft game

2017-06-22 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Hi Carlos, On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 12:24:01AM -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > > Many thanks, I'm glad a sponsor saw the package. :D > > If you want, I'll remove this 0.1-2 package leaving just 0.1-1 with the > included VCS if needed. > Thanks! Thank you for fixing up the changelog. Have

Bug#865515: RFS: pcc/1.2.0~20170614-1 [ITP]

2017-06-22 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Adam Borowski wrote: > It was briefly in the archive: https://packages.qa.debian.org/p/pcc.html > Removed due to no upstream activity. I see the upstream is somewhat alive > nowadays, although I wouldn't call the development brisk. Please read this advice about r