control: close -1
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "logdata-anomaly-miner"
I sponsored it in experimental (due to the freeze), but please:
1) drop the patch (python2.6 is dead now)
I don't see lintian complains without that patch.
(waiting eventually for a -2 in experimental :) )
Hello
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 07:43:35PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:
* New upstream version 0.7.0
This release contains a backwards incompatible
change because it changes how the device hash is
computed for Linux root hub devices
How is it handled for users that already have a config
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
the package builds fine with pbuilder but tests fails when i try to
build using sbuild.
FAIL UseCase/001_cli_policy.sh (exit status: 1)
some tests are skipped, i feel they should run
perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo?
UseCase/002_cli_d
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 06:07:40PM +0800, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> some tests are skipped, i feel they should run
>
>
> perhaps usbguard should build-depend on sudo?
>
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log: + sudo -n dd bs=4096 count=1 if=/dev/zero
> of=/tmp/usbguard_disk
> UseCase/002_cli_devices.
On June 1, 2017 6:13:06 PM GMT+08:00, Andrey Rahmatullin
wrote:
>> UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh.log: SKIP UseCase/002_cli_devices.sh
>(exit status: 77)
>No, it's a bad idea to do things requiring root during tests,
>especially
>modprobe/rmmod
Maybe those tests can be run using autopkgtests
I'
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" for experimental
* Package name: groonga
Version : 7.0.3-1
Upstream Author : Groonga Project
* Url : http://groonga.org/
* Licenses: LGPL-2.1
package sponsorship-requests
tag 859778 - moreinfo
thanks
$ dput mentors xtrs_4.9d-1_amd64.changes
Checking signature on .changes
gpg: /home/branden/src/GIT/debian/xtrs_4.9d-1_amd64.changes: Valid signature
from D19E9C7D71266DCE
Checking signature on .dsc
gpg: /home/branden/src/GIT/debian/xtrs_4
X-Debbugs-CC: sramac...@debian.org
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> To make this perfectly clear (again): I, as udev/systemd maintainer,
> object to maintaining that u2f udev rule as a downstream patch in udev
> and I will remove that patch from src:systemd pos
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:08:08 +0200
with message-id <20170601230808.zbznqrtwtgrjw...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#863894: RFS: groonga/7.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #863894,
regarding RFS: groonga/7.0.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 01:35:00 +0200
with message-id <20170601233500.ltq3s54zsj3lj...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#863432: RFS: bluemon/1.4-7 [QA-Upload]
has caused the Debian Bug report #863432,
regarding RFS: bluemon/1.4-7 [QA-Upload]
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Am 02.06.2017 um 00:13 schrieb Nicolas Braud-Santoni:
> Since no other workable solutions were proposed, and since Michael made it
> clear
> that this is not baggage he would carry in udev, I updated the proposed
> upload:
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-auth/libu2f-host.git/log/?h=rf
Your message dated Fri, 02 Jun 2017 04:26:51 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #850670,
regarding RFS: rpyc/3.3.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:28:51 +0100
with message-id <20170602052851.3elrzu6wk32lw...@zephyr.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive RFSs
has caused the Debian Bug report #851799,
regarding RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1+nmu1 [NMU]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:28:51 +0100
with message-id <20170602052851.3elrzu6wk32lw...@zephyr.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive RFSs
has caused the Debian Bug report #851799,
regarding RFS: hamlib/3.1.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Fri, 2 Jun 2017 06:28:51 +0100
with message-id <20170602052851.3elrzu6wk32lw...@zephyr.silentflame.com>
and subject line Closing inactive RFSs
has caused the Debian Bug report #854938,
regarding RFS: wxmaxima/16.12.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Dear Patrick,
Please accept my apologies for allowing this RFS to fall through the
cracks.
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 08:30:00AM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> The new version is here:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/drgeo/drgeo_1.1.0-10.3.dsc
You've written
- All modification
16 matches
Mail list logo
