control: reopen -1
control: tags -1 moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Remove moreinfo once you have something ready.
G.
Your message dated Wed, 03 May 2017 04:27:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: visual-fill-column/1.11-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #861705,
regarding
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fonts-fandol"
* Package name: fonts-fandol
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Clerk Ma
* URL : https://www.ctan.org/pkg/fandol
* License : GPL-3 with
Hi
I have a package .install file where a library expects to go into /usr/lib/
x86_64-gnu/[subdirectory] on amd64 systems. I realize this is not portable.
What regex can I use to substitute for the arch directory in my .install file?
Thanks,
shawn
control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Ciao Gianfranco,
Thank you for sponsoring this upload of visual-fill-column! :-)
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:01:55PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: reopen -1
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
> control: owner -1 !
>
>
> Remove moreinfo once you have somethi
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 10:40:06PM -0500, Zebulon McCorkle wrote:
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/multimc/multimc_0.5.1-1.dsc
404.
Since this software requires Minecraft, which is non-free, it will need
to go into contrib, not main.
--
Sea
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block -1 by 861705
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "writeroom-mode"
* Package name: writeroom-mode
Version : 3.6.1-1
Upstream Author : Joost Kremers
* URL : https://github.com/joos
.install uses shell wildcards, not regexes, so /usr/lib/*/subdirectory
The standard name on amd64 is actually x86_64-linux-gnu
(https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Tuples).
On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 13:28 -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 10:40:06PM -0500, Zebulon McCorkle wrote:
> >
> > dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/multimc/mul
> > timc_0.5.1-1.dsc
> 404.
>
> Since this software requires Minecr
Your message dated Thu, 4 May 2017 00:38:24 +0200
with message-id <20170503223824.3h7lfrjlua4nb...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#861757: RFS: fonts-fandol/0.3-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #861757,
regarding RFS: fonts-fandol/0.3-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Thu, 4 May 2017 00:38:24 +0200 Adam Borowski wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure .otf are the real sources, despite the upstream
> providing only otf. For now, let's assume they are, unless there's evidence
> to the contrary (not sure what the README means).
The README is pretty clear that the fon
在 2017年5月4日星期四 +08 上午8:09:13,Paul Wise 写道:
> The README is pretty clear that the fonts are compile to OpenType using
> AFDKO from FontForge and or Inkscape source. AFDKO is not in Debian
> main so this font should go to contrib. In addition, no FontForge
> source format or SVG files were released a
11 matches
Mail list logo