Bug#857706: RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-homedecor/0.4.15-1

2017-03-17 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 15/03/2017 à 10:55, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : > > % cat debian/minetest-mod-homedecor.lintian-overrides > # used by upstream, not by us > minetest-mod-homedecor: script-not-executable > usr/share/games/minetest/mods/homedecor/homedecor/listnodes.sh > > Well, ok, but that's not the point.

Bug#857706: marked as done (RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-homedecor/0.4.15-1)

2017-03-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:53:20 +0100 with message-id <20170317145319.vaul4h2hwqc73...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#857706: RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-homedecor/0.4.15-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #857706, regarding RFS/ITP: minetest-mod-homedecor/0.4.15-1 to be marked as don

Bug#858043: RFS: golang-github-gorilla-rpc/0.0~git20160927.0.22c016f-1

2017-03-17 Thread Henti Smith
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-gorilla-rpc" * Package name: golang-github-gorilla-rpc Version : 0.0~git20160927.0.22c016f-1 Upstream

Bug#857856: marked as done (RFS: gmrun/0.9.2-2.2 [RC, NMU])

2017-03-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:49:51 -0700 with message-id <20170317174951.wwsxdrlsqsdff...@iris.silentflame.com> and subject line Re: Bug#857856: RFS: gmrun/0.9.2-2.2 [RC, NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #857856, regarding RFS: gmrun/0.9.2-2.2 [RC, NMU] to be marked as done. This me

Bug#856827: RFS: xfce4-equake-plugin/1.3.8.1-2 [RC]

2017-03-17 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear Jeroen, Please be sure to CC the RFS bug! On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 10:49:27PM -0700, Jeroen van Aart wrote: > > I'd like to see some improvements to your changelog before uploading > > this. > > > > - changes to d/copyright not documented > > > > - the last point about avoiding lintian warnin

What option should I now use to do source only builds

2017-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I have understood from NEWS.debian of pbuilder 0.228 that the '-S' option does not work any more. Unfortunately I did not understood what I need to do now to do a source only build (nor what the problem of this simple way was). Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de

Re: What option should I now use to do source only builds

2017-03-17 Thread Jens Reyer
Hi Andreas On 03/17/2017 11:32 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I have understood from NEWS.debian of pbuilder 0.228 that the '-S' > option does not work any more. Unfortunately I did not understood what > I need to do now to do a source only build (nor what the problem of this > simple way wa

Bug#858083: RFS: libbloom/1.4-1~exp1 [ITP] -- simple and small bloom filter implementation in C

2017-03-17 Thread Roger Shimizu
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: j...@virkki.com, max.c...@gmail.com, rogershim...@gmail.com Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libbloom" * Package name: libbloom Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Jyri J. Virkki * URL

Re: What option should I now use to do source only builds

2017-03-17 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Jens, On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 12:16:15AM +0100, Jens Reyer wrote: > > James Clarke wrote in https://bugs.debian.org/853886#10: > > "For source-only builds, I don't understand why you would want to > perform the build in a chroot. Since Build-Depends are requested on my local machine anyway a