Your message dated Wed, 8 Feb 2017 18:13:23 +0900
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#846762: RFS: fonts-genericons/3.4.1-1[ITP] -- vector
icons embedded in a webfont
has caused the Debian Bug report #846762,
regarding RFS: fonts-genericons/3.4.1-1 [ITP] -- vector icons embedded in a
webfo
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Gard,
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gudhi"
>
> * Package name : gudhi
>Version : 1.3.1+ds-1
>Upstream Author : Gudhi Project / INRIA
> * URL : http://gu
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear lumin,
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 11:44 PM, lumin wrote:
>
> * Package name: gemmlowp
>Version : 0~20161216-gb56df4a-1
Thanks for your clean packaging!
I cannot sponsor the upload, just a few comments after reviewing your package.
I see some activi
Dear mentors,
During my attempt to review RFS package in mentors list, I find actually
there's no good manual for this activity.
At first I even don't know what to do with the downloaded .dsc and two
tarballs, because my previous experience was all using high level packaging
tool, such as git-
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> During my attempt to review RFS package in mentors list, I find actually
> there's no good manual for this activity.
Did you see the existing documentation?
http://mentors.debian.net/intro-reviewers
https://wiki.debian.org/SponsorChecklist
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:03 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
>> During my attempt to review RFS package in mentors list, I find actually
>> there's no good manual for this activity.
>
> Did you see the existing documentation?
>
> http://mentors.debian
Dear Roger,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 10:50:32PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> During my attempt to review RFS package in mentors list, I find
> actually there's no good manual for this activity.
>
> At first I even don't know what to do with the downloaded .dsc and two
> tarballs, because my previ
Hi,>Yes, but those docs didn't provide info detailed enough for me to start.
>Probably I too much rely on the high level tools, and lack of ability
>to use plumbing level tools such as dpkg-*.
a low-level manual is something nice to have...
I propose some additions for non-new packages:
"dget -
Dear Sean, Gianfranco,
Thanks for your feedback!
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:18 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
>
> I've made some edits.
>
> Your page should probably discuss sbuild/pbuilder.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 11:23 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> a low-level manual is something nice to have.
Hi,
>> apt build-dep (dsc-file) to build-dependencies>
>I remember "apt build-dep " is only for package already
>exists in archive.
when the argument is a dsc file, apt parses the dependency list.
(IIRC this is a feature since apt 1.0 or 1.1)
G.
[2017-02-06 09:08] Arturo Borrero Gonzalez
>
> part text/plain 639
> On 5 February 2017 at 07:12, Joshua Honeycutt
> wrote:
> > Alternatively, one can download the package with dget using this command:
> >
> > dget -x
> > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/s
I have this error from Lintian output:
E: ntfsundelete-tree: maintainer-address-malformed Narcis Garcia
How can I better mask e-mail address in control file?
Thanks.
--
__
I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this list's archives. Mail
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 07:56:42PM +0100, Narcis Garcia wrote:
> I have this error from Lintian output:
> E: ntfsundelete-tree: maintainer-address-malformed Narcis Garcia
>
>
> How can I better mask e-mail address in control file?
You don't.
And once you write to any public Debian mailing list
❦ 8 février 2017 19:56 +0100, Narcis Garcia :
> I have this error from Lintian output:
> E: ntfsundelete-tree: maintainer-address-malformed Narcis Garcia
>
>
> How can I better mask e-mail address in control file?
It needs to be machine-readable to let you receive bug reports or other
packagi
On Wednesday, 8 February 2017 18:46:46 CET Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Dear Gard,
>
> I cannot sponsor the upload. But here's my review that I hope it's helpful.
Dear Roger,
Thank you very much for your helpful feedback. I believe I have
rectified some of the below.
> Here're the items need to be fi
> On 8 Feb 2017, at 14:49, Gianfranco Costamagna
> wrote:
>>> apt build-dep (dsc-file) to build-dependencies>
>
>> I remember "apt build-dep " is only for package already
>
>> exists in archive.
>
>
>
> when the argument is a dsc file, apt parses the dependency list.
> (IIRC this is a featur
Disclaimer: longtime apt contributor
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 02:49:32PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >> apt build-dep (dsc-file) to build-dependencies>
> >I remember "apt build-dep " is only for package already
> >exists in archive.
>
> when the argument is a dsc file, apt parses the dep
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:15 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Yes, but those docs didn't provide info detailed enough for me to start.
> Probably I too much rely on the high level tools, and lack of ability
> to use plumbing level tools such as dpkg-*.
I think most people encounter all these tools earl
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roadfighter"
* Package name: roadfighter
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Donizete Froes
* URL : https://github.com/coringao/roadfighter
* Li
19 matches
Mail list logo
