Bug#846979: RFS: freedroidrpg/0.16.1-2

2016-12-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freedroidrpg"

Re: Start to help with a RFA package (or else)

2016-12-09 Thread Vincent Carluer
I may need some help to go further. For now I've managed to: - Build xmacro in Jessy - Reproduce the gcc-6 FTBFS in stretch - Applied the patch with quilt and made it compile on stretch ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831195) - Learn some packaging debian-fu I didn't test the s

Re: Start to help with a RFA package (or else)

2016-12-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:05:38AM +0100, Vincent Carluer wrote: > Before doing that I want to be sure the current maintainer is OK for me to > adopt the package but he does not answer ( > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832150) 1.5 days is a short time to wait for an answer. Also

Re: Start to help with a RFA package (or else)

2016-12-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >I may need some help to go further. >For now I've managed to: >- Build xmacro in Jessy s/Jessy/Jessie :) >- Reproduce the gcc-6 FTBFS in stretch wonderful >- Applied the patch with quilt and made it compile on stretch >(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=831195) you need

Bug#843179: marked as done (RFS: logdata-anomaly-miner/0.0.6-1)

2016-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:04:47 + (UTC) with message-id <469211545.1516994.1481281487...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line RFS: logdata-anomaly-miner/0.0.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843179, regarding RFS: logdata-anomaly-miner/0.0.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#847403: marked as done (RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.6-1)

2016-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:06:08 + (UTC) with message-id <468393021.1534402.1481281568...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847403: RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #847403, regarding RFS: nlohmann-json/2.0.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#843362: marked as done (RFS: wand/0.4.4-1)

2016-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:07:54 + (UTC) with message-id <458151480.1513605.1481281674...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#843362: RFS: wand/0.4.4-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #843362, regarding RFS: wand/0.4.4-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#847120: marked as done (RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.7+ds.1-1)

2016-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:11:25 + (UTC) with message-id <85009362.1507070.1481281885...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847120: RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.7-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #847120, regarding RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.7+ds.1-1 to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#840424: marked as done (RFS: verilog-mode/20161124.fd230e6-1 [ITP])

2016-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2016 11:32:11 + (UTC) with message-id <1822650434.1601178.1481283131...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode has caused the Debian Bug report #840424, regarding RFS: verilog-mode/20161124.fd230e6-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This mea

Bug#847105: (no subject)

2016-12-09 Thread Breno Leitao
Hello Lucio, Thanks for submitting the package to Debian, but I still see major lintian errors on the package you submit. Please address, at least, error and warnings lintian erros. These are important before asking for sponsorship. Closing the pedantic bugs is a plus. :-) Also, it seems to be

Bug#847105:

2016-12-09 Thread Frederic Bonnard
Hi guys, also, Lucio, do you do your builds in clean schroots? In a new schroot, you'll be in the same condition as people trying to build your packages. Once you build a package once, you can re-run dpkg-buildpackage to be sure, you handle correctly rebuild in the same directory. Also for lintian,

Bug#846399: RFS: rush/1.8+dfsg-1 -- New upstream's release.

2016-12-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >There is no problem to fetch the key. The problem is to use it. My present >use case is this > > gpgv --homedir debian/upstream --keyring debian/upstream/signing-key.pgp \ >archive.sig archive > >You are requesting me to use 'debian/upstream/signing-key.asc', an armoured key >which gpg

Bug#847426: RFS: fortune-zh/2.0

2016-12-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi,> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "fortune-zh" hopefully somebody from your team will pick it up, but I already trust you enough to sponsor this package compat level is 10 now (debhelper >=10) but something I really would like is to

Bug#842520: RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1

2016-12-09 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: reopen -1 control: owner -1 sba...@debian.org Hi, >@Gianfranco, you want to sponsor/upload this package? Or I'll manage this? please go ahead! :) thanks in advance and welcome! G.

Bug#847210: RFS: shutter/0.93.1-1.1 [NMU]

2016-12-09 Thread Boyuan Yang
在 2016年12月6日星期二 SGT 下午10:32:20,Boyuan Yang 写道: > It builds those binary packages: > > shutter - feature-rich screenshot program > > To access further information about this package, please visit the following > URL: > > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/shutter/0.93.1-1.1

Bug#847210: marked as done (RFS: shutter/0.93.1-1.1 [NMU])

2016-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 9 Dec 2016 13:12:05 + (UTC) with message-id <954243822.1691262.1481289125...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#847210: RFS: shutter/0.93.1-1.1 [NMU] has caused the Debian Bug report #847210, regarding RFS: shutter/0.93.1-1.1 [NMU] to be marked as done. This means

Bug#847210: RFS: shutter/0.93.1-1.1 [NMU]

2016-12-09 Thread Boyuan Yang
在 2016年12月9日星期五 SGT 下午1:12:05,Gianfranco Costamagna 写道: > Hi, > > >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/shutter/ > > > >shutter_0.93.1-1.1.dsc > > sponsored in deferred/10, please forward patches upstream! Thank you very much! Patches are, in fact, retrieved from upstream issues re

Bug#842520: marked as done (RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1)

2016-12-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 09 Dec 2016 16:26:28 + with message-id and subject line Bug#842520: fixed in glances 2.7.1.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #842520, regarding RFS: glances/2.7.1.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is no

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

2016-12-09 Thread Sean Whitton
Thanks for fixing this, Gianfranco. Fwiw it build in sbuild on my machine. -- Sean Whitton signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

2016-12-09 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Kiwamu, On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 10:51:05PM +0900, Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > OK. I think I should learn "pristine-tar" before the next day. Or you can just share the tarball via any web server. I would suggest reading dgit-sponsorship(7), a tutorial manpage (apt-get install dgit). -- Sean Whi

Bug#847586: RFS: colord-gtk/0.1.26-1.1 (RC, NMU)

2016-12-09 Thread Andreas Moog
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "colord-gtk" * Package name: colord-gtk Version : 0.1.26-1.1 Section : graphics It builds those binary packages: colord-gtk-utils - miscellaneous GUI utilities

Bug#847588: RFS: validator.js/4.7.1+dfsg1-1.1 (RC, NMU)

2016-12-09 Thread Andreas Moog
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "validator.js" * Package name: validator.js Version : 4.7.1+dfsg1-1.1 Section : web It builds those binary packages: libjs-validator - Javascript string validat

Bug#847105:

2016-12-09 Thread Lucio Correia
On 09/12/2016 09:48, Breno Leitao wrote: Also, it seems to be generating a key during the build? Why do you need a key generated during the build? It's for preventing "Logjam" attacks. I will move it to post-install, and add a parameter '-dsaparam' to make it run faster. I will review my en

Bug#847603: RFS: mod_pagespeed/1.11.33.4 [ITP] -- Apache module for rewriting web pages to reduce latency and bandwidth

2016-12-09 Thread Jeff Kaufman
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mod_pagespeed": * Package name: mod_pagespeed Version : 1.11.33.4 Upstream Author : Google mod_pagespeed team * URL : https://github.com/pagespeed/mod_pagesp

Bug#847604: RFS: ekg2/1:0.4~pre+20120506.1-13 [QA] [RC]

2016-12-09 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ekg2" * Package name: ekg2 Version : 1:0.4~pre+20120506.1-13 Upstream Author : Multiple * URL : http://ekg2.org/ * License : GPL-2+ Section

Bug#847607: RFS: zconfig/3.1.0-1

2016-12-09 Thread Julien Muchembled
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zconfig". * Package name: zconfig Version : 3.1.0-1 Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/ZConfig * Lice

Bug#847608: RFS: zodbpickle/0.6.0-1 [ITP]

2016-12-09 Thread Julien Muchembled
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zodbpickle" * Package name: zodbpickle Version : 0.6.0-1 Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors * URL : https://github.com/zopefoundation/zodbpickl

Bug#847609: RFS: python-btrees/4.3.1-1 [ITP]

2016-12-09 Thread Julien Muchembled
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-btrees" * Package name: python-btrees Version : 4.3.1-1 Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors * URL : https://github.com/zopefoundation/BTr

Bug#847610: RFS: obconf/1:2.0.4+git20150213-2

2016-12-09 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "obconf" * Package name: obconf Version : 1:2.0.4+git20150213-2 Upstream Author : Dana Jansens * URL : http://www.openbox.org/dist/obconf/ * License

Bug#847617: RFS: ekg/1:1.9~pre+r2855-4 [QA, RC]

2016-12-09 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ekg" * Package name: ekg Version : 1:1.9~pre+r2855-4 Upstream Author : Wojtek Kaniewski * URL : http://ekg.chmurka.net * License : GPL-2+ S

Bug#847637: RFS: gap-sonata/2.8+ds-1 [ITP]

2016-12-09 Thread Jerome Benoit
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear Sponsor, I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian GAP package gap-sonata [1,2] which brings to Debian the GAP package SONATA; SONATA stands for Systems Of Nearrings And Their Applications. This GAP package is preloa