Bug#847070: RFS: patat/0.4.4.0-2

2016-12-05 Thread FĂ©lix Sipma
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "patat": patat - Terminal-based presentations using Pandoc Package: patat Version: 0.4.4.0-2 Upstream Author: Jasper Van der Jeugt Homepage: http://github.com/jaspervdj/patat License: GPL

Bug#845976: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2935-1

2016-12-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Control: owner -1 ! On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 01:16:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moc" o/ > dget -x > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/moc/moc_2.6.0~svn-r2935-1.dsc One request: please bump the debhe

Bug#846364: RFS: discover/2.1.2-7.1 [NMU]

2016-12-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Fernando Seiti Furusato] > Indeed. Curiously it works on ppc64el. [Andrey Rahmatullin] > I guess it's not ppc64el but the machine HW configuration. This sound likely. What is the output from lspci on the machine you experience the crash? Btw, why do you want to update discover? I thought most

Bug#846364: RFS: discover/2.1.2-7.1 [NMU]

2016-12-05 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 10:04:00AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Fernando Seiti Furusato] > > Indeed. Curiously it works on ppc64el. > > [Andrey Rahmatullin] > > I guess it's not ppc64el but the machine HW configuration. > > This sound likely. What is the output from lspci on the machine

Bug#846364: RFS: discover/2.1.2-7.1 [NMU]

2016-12-05 Thread Fernando Seiti Furusato
Hello, Petter. On 12/05/2016 07:04 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > This sound likely. What is the output from lspci on the machine you > experience > the crash? This actually happens after a simple rebuild on x86_64. I just don't know if it does happen on any machine. If so, this package wil

Bug#847079: RFS: groonga/6.1.1-1

2016-12-05 Thread Kentaro Hayashi
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "groonga" * Package name: groonga Version : 6.1.1-1 Upstream Author : Groonga Project * Url : http://groonga.org/ * Licenses: LGPL-2.1 Section :

Bug#845976: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2935-1

2016-12-05 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
* Mattia Rizzolo [2016-12-05 10:56 +0100]: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > Control: owner -1 ! > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 01:16:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moc" > > o/ > > > dget -x > > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/

Bug#845976: marked as done (RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2935-1)

2016-12-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:08:28 +0100 with message-id <20161205140827.gc19...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#845976: RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2935-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #845976, regarding RFS: moc/1:2.6.0~svn-r2935-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

2016-12-05 Thread Kiwamu Okabe
Dear Sean, On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: >> > 1. The line "Only support emacs and xemacs" doesn't make sense (what >> > else would you be supporting?). What were you trying to say? >> >> Fixed. It's my simple mistake. I should say "Support emacs and xemacs." > > In that cas

Bug#846364: RFS: discover/2.1.2-7.1 [NMU]

2016-12-05 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Fernando Seiti Furusato] > I was wondering if this was still an active package, since there > wasn't much activity on bts. Right. I have given it a polish once in a while, but there is no new features planned. I belive the way forward is AppStream for the hardware-package mappings, and tools li

Bug#847101: RFS: kimchi/2.3.0-1 - HTML5 based management tool for KVM

2016-12-05 Thread Lucio Correia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, We look for a sponsor for package "kimchi" Package name: kimchi Version : 2.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Kimchi team URL : https://github.com/kimchi-project/kimchi License : LGPL-2.1+/Apache-2.0 Secti

Bug#847102: RFS: ginger/2.3.0-1 - HTML5-based host management tool

2016-12-05 Thread Lucio Correia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, We look for a sponsor for package "ginger" Package name: ginger Version : 2.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Kimchi-Ginger team URL : https://github.com/kimchi-project/ginger License : LGPL-2.1+/Apache-2.0

Bug#847105: RFS: wok/2.3.0-1 - Webserver Originated from Kimchi

2016-12-05 Thread Lucio Correia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, We look for a sponsor for package "wok" Package name: wok Version : 2.3.0-1 Upstream Author : Kimchi-Ginger team URL : https://github.com/kimchi-project/wok License : LGPL-2.1+/Apache-2.0 Section

Bug#847108: RFS: ginger-base/2.2.1-1 - Basic host management for Kimchi and Ginger

2016-12-05 Thread Lucio Correia
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, We look for a sponsor for package "ginger-base" Package name: ginger-base Version : 2.2.1-1 Upstream Author : Kimchi-Ginger team URL : https://github.com/kimchi-project/gingerbase License : LGP

Bug#847113: RFS: lacme/0.2-1 - ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind

2016-12-05 Thread Guilhem Moulin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lacme" * Package name: lacme Version : 0.2-1 Upstream Author : Guilhem Moulin * URL : https://git.guilhem.org/lacme/about/ * License : GPL-3+ Section

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

2016-12-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Dear Kiwamu, On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 12:11:46AM +0900, Kiwamu Okabe wrote: > And also some lintian errors in debian/copyright are fixed. But I can't fix > following a lintian error. Is it a issue on the side of lintian > command? No, it's not Lintian's mistake. You have: Files: 0test.el, ba

Bug#847120: RFS: engauge-digitizer/9.7-1

2016-12-05 Thread Tobias Winchen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "engauge-digitizer" * Package name: engauge-digitizer Version : 9.7-1 Upstream Author : Mark Mitchell * URL : https://github.com/markummitchell/engauge6

Bug#846798: marked as done (RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-1)

2016-12-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 5 Dec 2016 21:22:49 + (UTC) with message-id <1234703784.50079.1480972969...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line R: Bug#846798: RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #846798, regarding RFS: speedcrunch/0.12.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#845971: sponsor is uploading

2016-12-05 Thread Geert Stappers
Control: tag -1 pending Yes, davmail_4.7.3.2438-1 will be uploaded. Changes I made: diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 7b11665..0d91d6d 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ davmail (4.7.3.2438-1) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/patches:

Bug#845971: marked as done (RFS: davmail/4.7.3.2438-1 [ITP])

2016-12-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 05 Dec 2016 22:23:19 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: davmail/4.7.3.2438-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #845971, regarding RFS: davmail/4.7.3.2438-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#847113: marked as done (RFS: lacme/0.2-1 - ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind)

2016-12-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 6 Dec 2016 01:49:04 +0100 with message-id <20161206004903.gc9...@mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#847113: RFS: lacme/0.2-1 - ACME client written with process isolation and minimal privileges in mind has caused the Debian Bug report #847113, regarding RFS: lacme/0.2-1 -

Bug#830845: marked as done (RFS: fatx/1.12-2 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support)

2016-12-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 06 Dec 2016 04:28:37 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: fatx/1.12-2 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support has caused the Debian Bug report #830845, regarding RFS: fatx/1.12-2 [ITP] -- Complete XBOX filesystem support to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#840424: RFS: verilog-mode

2016-12-05 Thread Kiwamu Okabe
Dear Sean, On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Sean Whitton wrote: > No, it's not Lintian's mistake. > > You have: > > Files: 0test.el, batch_prof.el, batch_test.el, batch_test.pl > > You should have: > > Files: 0test.el batch_prof.el batch_test.el batch_test.pl Thanks. It's my mistake and f