Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "acorn"
* Package name: acorn
Version : 4.0.3-1
Upstream Author : (big list)
* URL : https://github.com/ternjs/acorn
* License : Expat
Section
In #832941 Sean Whitton writes:
> 6. config.guess, config.sub, configure, configure.in, Makefile.in and
> install-sh are not accounted for in d/copyright.
Hi,
The license and the copyright of these files is pretty much the same all
the time (some details can depend on the date). However, track
On 23.11.2016 at 20:54, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Vern and Mateusz,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ranger"
too much changes without an ack from the Maintainer (in cc)
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Merged lastest upstream gi
wf...@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner) writes:
> The license and the copyright of these files is pretty much the same all
> the time (some details can depend on the date).
It's part of the package maintainer's job to confirm that's the case for
this specific package, and document it in ‘debian/copyright’
hi,
>I contacted with him about half year ago but without answer. This is my
>reason of NMU.
ok but you still:
- have to restrict changes to a minimum necessary set (e.g. no bumping of
stuff)
- have to provide a debdiff on the bugs you close with what you want to be
sponsored, and tag it patch
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "globjects"
* Package name: globjects
Version : 1.0.0-2
Upstream Author : CG Internals
* URL : http://globjects.org/
* License : Expat
Section : l
Dear Sean,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 5:15 AM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Thank you for your work to bring this new package to Debian! As I said,
> I can't sponsor the upload, but I hope this more detailed review is
> useful to you.
Of course, your precisive review is very useful for me. Thanks.
> I'v
Hi,
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "globjects"
thanks!
G.
On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 20:39 +0100, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Your changes seem to be correct. I plan to upload the attached diff
> in some hours if you don't mind.
It is now present in unstable. However the buildd status seems bad.
ppc64el due to segfault during python2 test.
kfreebsd-*
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:05 PM, lumin wrote:
> It is now present in unstable. However the buildd status seems bad.
Yes, seen that. :(
> ppc64el due to segfault during python2 test.
Do you know any reason why it may happen?
> kfreebsd-* had never compiled protobuf since 3.x.x release.
Th
Hi,
I will sponsor imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u6 and release the DSA.
Thanks for you effort of keeping imagemagick secure!
/luciano
control: owner -1 luci...@debian.org
> I will sponsor imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u6 and release the DSA.
thanks!
G.
Your message dated Fri, 25 Nov 2016 17:15:18 + (UTC)
with message-id <1575959642.885664.1480094118...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#845051: RFS: freedroidrpg/0.16.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #845051,
regarding RFS: freedroidrpg/0.16.1-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This mean
Can i add a newer patch fixing the last cve ?
Le 25 novembre 2016 17:30:54 GMT+01:00, Luciano Bello a
écrit :
>Hi,
> I will sponsor imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u6 and release the DSA.
>
>Thanks for you effort of keeping imagemagick secure!
>
>/luciano
--
Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec K-
>Seems you used git. I did forgot to push, sorry. Now last version is published
>both on mentors and in git
>(https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/bcron.git)
I used also mentors, and it is still outdated>Nobody should use dh-text. With
recent dpkg-dev, which provide S:foo
>substi
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acorn/acorn_4.0.3-1.dsc
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/acorn/4.0.3-1/buildlog
FTBFS
>(2) upstream moved forward very fast and uses rollup to compile itself,
>but we don't have
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
(resending from the correct email)
>https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/acorn/acorn_4.0.3-1.dsc
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/acorn/4.0.3-1/buildlog
FTBFS
>(2) upstream moved forward very fast and uses rollup
Hi
>(autoconf specific copyrights)
they have special exceptions to be relicensed under another license.
So, if you don't account them specifically they will fall in the common
package license.
Somebody just don't care about them (I don't think it is source of reject by
ftpmasters).
I think ment
wf...@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner) writes:
> In #832941 Sean Whitton writes:
>> 6. config.guess, config.sub, configure, configure.in, Makefile.in and
>> install-sh are not accounted for in d/copyright.
> The license and the copyright of these files is pretty much the same all
> the time (some details
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mongovi"
* Package name: mongovi
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : me
* URL : https://github.com/timkuijsten/mongovi
* License : ISC
Section
On 11/11/2016 0826:45 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
> pbuilder sets the home directory of the pbuilder user to /nonexistent
> to make sure that builds don't modify files in the home directory,
> which is forbidden by Debian Policy (for good reason builds are not
> supposed to change things outside th
On 11/26/2016 01:59 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 0826:45 AM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> pbuilder sets the home directory of the pbuilder user to /nonexistent
>> to make sure that builds don't modify files in the home directory,
>> which is forbidden by Debian Policy (for good reason b
On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> For those who think it's important to document the licenses of these
> files, I would encourage you to work on writing a well-tested and reliable
> tool to automatically generate those stanzas (the notices are fairly
> consistent and open for
Hi!
Quoting Christian Seiler (2016-11-26 01:30:59)
> On 11/26/2016 01:59 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> > Could you point me to this policy? I'd like to learn more, but haven't
> > been able to find it.
> I just checked and it really isn't in there.
Oh. This is odd. I just reported #845715 to rect
On Friday, 25 November 2016 17:42:13 EST Bastien Roucaries wrote:
> Can i add a newer patch fixing the last cve ?
Do you think you can upload it for tomorrow? Let me unroll everything on this
end (I already asked for a DSA id, but I think I can put it back). Let me know
if you can upload to ment
25 matches
Mail list logo
