Your message dated Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:25:21 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #829520,
regarding RFS: mbpfan/1.9.1-1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for taking the time to do another thorough review of another of
my packaging efforts! :)
On 2016-11-19.19:47, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 20 novembre 2016 01:43 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>
> > * Rely on automatic -dbgsym package rather than deprecated -dbg.
>
> You need to mak
❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>> > * Use systemd .service files rather than init.d scripts (Closes: #678946,
>> > #805840, #839819, #412483).
>>
>> I am quite OK with that. You don't have time to sort out those
>> problems. However, this is somewhat controversial.
>>
>
>
On 2016-11-21 at 07:56, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>> I'm open to accepting patches / co-maintainership from anyone who
>> wishes to test and use traditional init scripts with quagga. Given
>> the longevity of bugs like #678946, I'm not optimistic of
OK, it worked. Thanks!
The remaining question is, is this .buildinfo issue on my side or on mentors'?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "globjects"
* Package name: globjects
Version : 1.0.0-1
Upstream Author : CG Internals
* URL : http://globjects.org/
* License : Expat
Section : l
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 05:04:02PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Ross, can you please fix and answer if you want to maintain or not
> the package?
I've uploaded an updated package to:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminology/terminology_0.9.1-1.dsc
New changelog:
[
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:43:56AM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> I've uploaded an updated package to:
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/terminology/terminology_0.9.1-1.dsc
>
> New changelog:
>
> [ Ross Vandegrift ]
> * New upstream release
>- Fix for "CVE-2015-8971: Escape S
On 2016-11-21 14:17+0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> OK, it worked. Thanks!
Or, at least, it seemed to. I still can't see anything on mentors...
$ dput mentors patat_0.4.0.0-1_amd64.changes --force
Uploading patat using http to mentors (host: mentors.debian.net; directory:
/upload)
running
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 02:17:26PM +0100, Félix Sipma wrote:
> The remaining question is, is this .buildinfo issue on my side or on mentors'?
mentor's
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Control: block 844003 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a backport of ublock-origin.
* Package name: ublock-origin
Version : 1.9.16+dfsg-1~bpo8+1
Upstream Author : Raymond Hill
* URL : https://github.com/
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:53:58PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Cool, please move "New maintainer" to the front so it's better visible.
>
> Alas, I'm afraid it doesn't quite work for me. In the first run, after
> maximizing it stopped redrawing its window and had to be killed (doesn't
> seem to
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:46:24PM -0500, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> So I'll prepare another version that consists only of the security fix
> backported to jessie. The new version will wait for experimental.
Here it is, this time just adopting and fixing the security issue:
https://mentors.debian.n
Hi,
I just updated the package on mentors,
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/protobuf/protobuf_3.0.0-7.1.dsc
https://mentors.debian.net/package/protobuf
And it passed the build on debomatic-amd64
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/protobuf/3.0.0-7.1/buildlog
The
Hi,
I prepared an NMU for protobuf for adding
python3-protobuf binary package, and now
I'm asking for maintainer comments and
looking for sponsor.
The package is available at
https://mentors.debian.net/package/protobuf
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/protobuf/protobuf_3.0.0-7.1.dsc
Hi Lumin,
I don't think a Cc is needed, all of us (should be) subscribed to this
mailing list.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 5:32 AM, lumin wrote:
> I prepared an NMU for protobuf for adding
> python3-protobuf binary package, and now
> I'm asking for maintainer comments and
> looking for sponsor.
I'l
16 matches
Mail list logo
