On 26 September 2016 at 23:12, wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "duperemove"
>
> * Package name: duperemove
>Version : 0.11~beta3-3
Hi,
First of all, thank you for your contribution.
Hi mentors,
I did a doona upload, with "closes #foo" in changelog, getting
a lintian error:
E possible-missing-colon-in-closes
closes #838630
since the bug is closed, because the system closes bugs even without the colon,
isn't this time to drop that error?
I'm not sure why something that work
On 28/09/16 10:55, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi mentors,
> I did a doona upload, with "closes #foo" in changelog, getting
> a lintian error:
>
> E possible-missing-colon-in-closes
> closes #838630
>
> since the bug is closed
It doesn't look closed to me.
> because the system closes bugs ev
Hi,
>It doesn't look closed to me.
Indeed, the bug was pending and then excluded from the list in BTS
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=doona&archive=no&pend-exc=pending-fixed&pend-exc=fixed&pend-exc=done&sev-inc=critical&sev-inc=grave&sev-inc=serious&repeatmerged=no
this is why
Hi Mattia,
thanks for looking at the package!
> so, this package is in DPMT, hence I'm looking only at the git repo.
I removed it from mentors and, as you are not far from sponsoring it ;),
did not re-upload the fixed version.
In case the sponsorship will not work out, I will re-upload it to
me
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 11:55:30 +
with message-id <20160928115528.zrpxynnqdx5w6...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#838566: RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #838566,
regarding RFS: mimerender/0.6.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means t
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo"
* Package name: pyzo
Version : 4.3-1
* License : BSD
Section : science
It builds those binary packages:
iep - transitional dummy package for IEP
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
> On 26 September 2016 at 23:12, wrote:
> > * Package name: duperemove
> >Version : 0.11~beta3-3
>
> "When given the -d option, duperemove will submit those extents for
> deduplication using the btrfs-extent-s
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo"
ERR:
--- pyzo-4.2.1/pyzo/util/qt/__init__.py 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ pyzo-4.3/pyzo/util/qt/__init__.py 2016-09-28 10:21:34.0 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+# -*- coding: utf-8 -*
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sean,
>libzxcvbn-dev - password strength estimation library - development files
>libzxcvbn0 - password strength estimation library
I'm a little bit worried about the makefile :(
CFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wdeclaration-after-statemen
On 2016-09-28 14:07, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:24:20AM +0200, Dariusz Dwornikowski wrote:
On 26 September 2016 at 23:12, wrote:
> * Package name: duperemove
>Version : 0.11~beta3-3
"When given the -d option, duperemove will submit those extents for
dedup
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Fernando
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "devtodo"
I would expect some changes more if you want
(note: they are usually out of an NMU scope, but with a maintainer mostly MIA,
and a package
RC buggy since 3 years, I think some work
On May 31, 2016 2:14 PM, "WalmartNotice" <
walpro...@mpls-executed.focusomes.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gratrs___sheliavarner47: Your__$ I000__Walmart GiftCard is Ready
>>>
>>> Get Your Card Here
Hey, nice work. I'm taking a look now.
X
Jerome BENOIT:
>
>
>
> Forwarded Message
> Subject: Bug#838679: RFS: cysignals/1.1.1+ds-1 [ITP] -- interrupt and signal
> handling for Cython
> Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 14:54:01 +
> Resent-From: Jerome Benoit
> Resent-To: de
On 28/09/16 14:58, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzo"
ERR:
--- pyzo-4.2.1/pyzo/util/qt/__init__.py 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0 +0100
+++ pyzo-4.3/pyzo/util/qt/__init__.py 2016-09-28 10:21:34.00
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:26:46 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #838575,
regarding RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:30:03 + (UTC)
with message-id <1644257473.553742.1475080203...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#839065: RFS: pyzo/4.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #839065,
regarding RFS: pyzo/4.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Hi Dominik
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress"
where did the package go?
G.
control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hello Gianfranco,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 02:29:42PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
Thank you for your interest!
>
> CFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wdeclaration-after-statement
> CPPFLAGS ?= -O2 -Wall -Wextra
>
>
> this is a no-op I guess, ma
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 16:51:25 + (UTC)
with message-id <2060439112.627156.1475081485...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#838801: RFS: zxcvbn-c/0.20150103-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #838801,
regarding RFS: zxcvbn-c/0.20150103-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
Thi
On 28/09/16 17:30, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
Hi Ghislain,
Argh, I though Almar did not embed QtPy in the codebase. My bad.
I pushed a new version on mentors with the updated d/copyright.
is that embedded copy used or not?
while waiting for the answer, I pushed it in deferred/5
G.
Hi,
>It is currently used and in a way that makes bypassing the vendoring
>not trivial. I filed a bug upstream [1] to ask for a better solution.
I'm sure you already know why this is bad, so I'll leave it in deferred/5, maybe
in the meanwhile upstream writes a patch :)
G.
Ximin Luo:
> Hey, nice work. I'm taking a look now.
>
Hey, it looks good! I couldn't spot any problems.
Just the following minor things:
(1)
d/rules:
override_dh_install-arch:
true
Could you add a comment explaining this? I didn't look in too much detail but I
couldn't figure out th
Control: reopen -1
Hi,
>>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flask-compress"
>
>
>where did the package go?
It went to "found a sponsor, had to change something, did not reupload because
sponsor does not use mentors" ;).
-nik
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:38:59 + (UTC)
with message-id <1232100538.715019.1475087939...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#838004: RFS: rear/1.18-1 ITP: rear -- Bare metal
disaster recovery and system migration framework
has caused the Debian Bug report #838004,
regarding R
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 18:42:00 + (UTC)
with message-id <1779962806.714628.1475088120...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#838575: RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #838575,
regarding RFS: flask-compress/1.3.1-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
T
> >It went to "found a sponsor, had to change something, did not reupload
> >because sponsor does not use mentors" ;).
>
>
> well, so in this case it is good to have it close, avoiding double reviews
> since
> you already have somebody who picked up the work!
well, or put an Owner on the bug,
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 20:36:57 + (UTC)
with message-id <1332832103.805778.1475095017...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#838859: RFS: clipf/0.4-2 [QA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #838859,
regarding RFS: clipf/0.4-2 [QA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi
> They are both used in the build. But if I understand you right, are you
> suggesting to drop the explicit dependencies since dh-autoreconf already
> depends on automake and libtool? If this is the customary way then I'll
> drop the explicit dependencies on automake and libtool.
I think so
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages]
Dear mentors,
Hello. I'd like to adopt the systemd-shim package. I suppose I
would need a sponsor/mentor to do that?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832508
It looks like it'
Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:05:23 -0700
with message-id <20160929040523.4k2x6radukoqi...@hephaestus.silentflame.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#839114: RFS: [ITA] Hi, I'd like to adopt systemd-shim
has caused the Debian Bug report #839114,
regarding RFS: [ITA] Hi, I'd like to adopt systemd
31 matches
Mail list logo
