[2016-08-17 13:21] Paul Wise
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > * dh-text
>
> I wonder if a mechanism for this should go directly into debhelper itself?
Probably, when it becomes more wide-spread? Right now, I can't prove that
this functionality is wanted by anyone
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 13:25 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
> There is another option. Manpage deb-substvars(5) mentions
> ${F:fieldname} variable, but it works only for a limited set of fields
> (like Source, Architecture, Section). For rest of fields, it expands
> to empty text. Maybe this limitati
Hi,
when trying to build the latest version of phyml[1] in pbuilder as usual
I get a very strange error which is possibly best summarised by grepping
for gcc:
$ grep gcc phyml_3.2.20160530+dfsg-1_amd64.build | grep -v Depends | tail -n 8
Preparing to unpack .../3-gcc-6-base_6.1.1-12_amd64.deb ...
Hi,
On 17/08/16 13:28, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when trying to build the latest version of phyml[1] in pbuilder as usual
> I get a very strange error which is possibly best summarised by grepping
> for gcc:
>
> $ grep gcc phyml_3.2.20160530+dfsg-1_amd64.build | grep -v Depends | tail -n 8
> Prepari
El 16/08/16 a las 09:15, Gianfranco Costamagna escribió:
> control: tags -1 moreinf
>
> Hi,
>
>>* Initial release (Closes: #739035)
> lets try a review:
>
> 1) std-version is 3.9.8 now
>
> 2) debhelper (>= 9), libncurses5-dev (>= 5.9),
> unzip (>= 6.0), libsdl2-dev (>= 2.0.2), libsdl1.2-de
Hi James,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:55:23PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
>
> I think there might be something up with your pbuilder chroot.s
After updating this the strange error vanished - sorry for the noise.
> At least
> the initial stages of the build work fine for me with sbuild (gcc error
Hi,
On 17/08/16 14:36, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:55:23PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
>>
>> I think there might be something up with your pbuilder chroot.s
>
> After updating this the strange error vanished - sorry for the noise.
>
>> At least
>> the initial stages of the
tag -1 moreinfo
I am putting this RFS on hold due to a temporary problem on
the packaging repository.
Ghis
Hi,
involving upstream into the discussion now.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 02:48:35PM +0100, James Cowgill wrote:
> > So lets come to the real build errors of [1]: I just fixed the first issue
> > in a new patch (please git pull) but I do not understand this one:
Stephane, I've created a simple fix
Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2016 16:24:26 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta9+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source
Evernote client
has caused the Debian Bug report #832704,
regarding RFS: nixnote2/2.0~beta9+ds-1 [ITP] -- Open Source Evernote client
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2016 20:54:03 +0200
with message-id <20160817185403.lc6g3zfmoiyqt...@sar0.p1otr.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#834322: RFS: phatch/0.2.7.1-3.2 [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #834322,
regarding RFS: phatch/0.2.7.1-3.2 [NMU] [RC]
to be marked as done.
This
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:04:39AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:39:33PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > > If the repository contains any tags, I'd strongly recommend the output
> > > > of
> > > > "git describe --tags". This will, beside DTRT when you're exactly
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:25:21PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > > > If the repository contains any tags, I'd strongly recommend the
> > > > > output of
> > > > > "git describe --tags". This will, beside DTRT when you're exactly on
> > > > > a
> > > > > tag (ie, on a release), produce versio
Hi,
On 17/08/16 21:59, Hanno 'Rince' Wagner wrote:
> I am packaging open-invaders, a clone of space invaders. I was able to
> "port" it (with a lot of help from friends) to gcc-6, but I have a
> problem with the used libraries.
>
> I am able to successfully compile and package open-invaders. But
Control: reopen -1
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
X-Debbugs-CC: locutusofb...@debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: spwhit...@spwhitton.name
X-Debbugs-CC: a...@debian.org
Hello all,
Sorry for the accidentally removal of nixnote2 from
mentors.debian.net. Upstream tagged the new version days ago and I was
trying to
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> That sounds like the best option. I've pointed the dpkg maintainer at
> your mail on IRC and asked for their thoughts on the matter.
Guillem got enthusiastic about this and came up with this patch:
https://www.hadrons.org/~guillem/tmp/0001-FIXM
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gifshuffle"
* Package name: gifshuffle
Version : 2.0-1
Upstream Author : Matthew Kwan
* URL : http://www.darkside.com.au/gifshuffle/
* License : public-d
Paul Wise writes:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> That sounds like the best option. I've pointed the dpkg maintainer at
>> your mail on IRC and asked for their thoughts on the matter.
>
> Guillem got enthusiastic about this and came up with this patch:
>
> https://www.had
18 matches
Mail list logo
