Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caffe-contrib"
* Package name: caffe-contrib
Version : 1.0.0~rc3-2
Upstream Author : BVLC
* URL : caffe.berkeleyvision.org
* License : BSD-2-Clause
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nixnote2"
* Package name: nixnote2
Version : 2.0~beta8+20160727+ds-1
Upstream Author : Randy Baumgarte
* URL : h
Hi,
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caffe-contrib"
its in
G.
On 07/28/2016 08:52 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:56:11AM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
>> That works now? When I set up a SH4 chroot a while back, I had to
>> use the qemu-sh4-static binary from the i386 version of the
>> qemu-user-static package, because the amd64 version
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"python-backports-shutil-get-terminal-size"
* Package name: python-backports-shutil-get-terminal-size
Version : 1.0.0-3
Upstream Author : Christopher Rosell
* URL
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2016 10:19:00 + (UTC)
with message-id
<1594417168.10416837.1469701140490.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#832712: RFS:
python-backports-shutil-get-terminal-size/1.0.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #832712,
regarding RFS: python-backpo
Hi,
>For debootstrap? No. For pbuilder? Yes.
I'm pretty sure it is a qemu missing feature or bug, but I reported it to
aptitude package [1]. Feel free to add useful bits here :)
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/832710
G.
Hi mentors,
Package caffe-contrib_1.0.0~rc3-2 [1][2] build-deps on CUDA 7.5.18,
which is currently available for sid. This package passed
the debomatic-amd64 build [3], however when buildd is working on
this package it says there is "dependency installbility problem" [4].
But how can the existing
* Christian Seiler , 2016-07-28, 11:00:
As debootstrap uses regular apt rather than aptitude, why would this
be a concern?
For debootstrap? No. For pbuilder? Yes.
Time to upgrade to sbuild? :-P
--
Jakub Wilk
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "entrypoints"
* Package name: entrypoints
Version : 0.2.2-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Takluyver
* URL : https://github.com/takluyver/entrypoints
* License
* Lumin , 2016-07-28, 12:06:
Package caffe-contrib_1.0.0~rc3-2 [1][2] build-deps on CUDA 7.5.18,
which is currently available for sid. This package passed the
debomatic-amd64 build [3], however when buildd is working on this
package it says there is "dependency installbility problem" [4].
But
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit"
* Package name: dh-runit
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov
* Url :
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git
* Li
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:02:14 + (UTC)
with message-id
<1692063175.10683061.1469721734182.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#832763: RFS: dh-runit/0.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #832763,
regarding RFS: dh-runit/0.4
to be marked as done.
This means tha
[2016-07-27 20:17] Jakub Wilk
>
> * Dmitry Bogatov , 2016-07-27, 20:41:
> >Clear-signed information, required by DSA team is attached.
> [...]
> >Architectures requested: hurd, m68k, sh4
>
> FWIW, the are currently no DSA-operated porterboxes for any of these
> architectures.
>
> >Rationaly: repro
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit"
* Package name: runit
Version : 2.1.2-5
Upstream Author : Gerrit Pape
* Url : http://smarden.org/runit/
* Licenses: BSD-3-clause
Section
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2016 16:26:00 + (UTC)
with message-id <396902973.10841256.1469723160886.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#832766: RFS: runit/2.1.2-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #832766,
regarding RFS: runit/2.1.2-5
to be marked as done.
This means tha
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2016 20:22:13 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: RFS: cdist/4.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #832515,
regarding RFS: cdist/4.2.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Hi,
>Anyone still willing to sponsor my request, please?
I sent the signed email for you, but the real question is:
why aren't you a DM or a DD?
I was almost sure you were already a DM, this is why I didn't get
the mail to send question (as DM you just need to apply from nm.d.o website
for gues
Do anybody know why I'm not able to send RT requests anymore?
below a copy of the message
Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address.
:
Remote host said:
550-messages to the Request Tracker system require a subject tag or a
550 subaddress
[BODY]
--- Below this line
* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-07-28, 18:39:
Subject: DebianRT
Missing space between "Debian" and "RT".
Also, neither the subject nor the body say what you are actually asking
for...
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
"Requests need to be clear-signed. Request-tra
Hi,
>Missing space between "Debian" and "RT".
indeed, that did the trick
>Also, neither the subject nor the body say what you are actually asking
>for...
actually I tried 4 times, with changes in subject and signing type, but I didn't
get it correctly both :)
>"Requests need to be clear-sig
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient"
* Package name: udfclient
Version : 0.8.6-1
Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk
* URL : http://www.13thmonkey.org/udfclient/
* License : Clar
Your message dated Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:27:28 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#832786: RFS: udfclient/0.8.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #832786,
regarding RFS: udfclient/0.8.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist"
* Package name: cdist
Version : 4.2.2-1
Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius
* Url : http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/
* Licenses: GP
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cligh"
* Package name: cligh
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Christopher M. Brannon
* Url : http://the-brannons.com/software/cligh.html
* Licenses: GP
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist"
>
>* Package name: cdist
> Version : 4.2.2-1
EALREADYINUNSTABLE.
G.
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:39:06 + (UTC)
with message-id <284713961.11060913.1469774346510.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#832814: RFS: cligh/0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #832246,
regarding RFS: cligh/0.2-5
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 29 Jul 2016 06:39:06 + (UTC)
with message-id <284713961.11060913.1469774346510.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#832814: RFS: cligh/0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #832814,
regarding RFS: cligh/0.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
28 matches
Mail list logo
