Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit"
* Package name: dh-runit
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Dmitry Bogatov
* Url :
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/dh-runit.git
* Li
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 08:15:23 + (UTC)
with message-id <676014666.5466756.1468570523572.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#831370: RFS: dh-runit/0.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #831370,
regarding RFS: dh-runit/0.3
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Hi,
how are runit features like disabled services (via the "down" file, for
the case that a service should be visible to runit, but not started by
default) or log services handled?
Regards,
Tino
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
>
> Just applied your previous patch (partly): https://github.com/rogers0/libcork
> It should work now.
> Since you gave me the DM upload permision (Thanks so much!), I'll try
> to upload after some more changes.
Dear G,
I released 0.15.0+ds-
Hi,
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcork/0.15.0+ds-5
some hours ago, I had to retry the build on amd64 and i386 archs if I remember
correctly.
Retrying the build was fine
(I remember it failed for testsuite failures)
bug closed,
thanks
G.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcork/0.15.0+ds-5
>
>
>
> some hours ago, I had to retry the build on amd64 and i386 archs if I remember
> correctly.
>
> Retrying the build was fine
> (I remember it failed for testsu
> how are runit features like disabled services (via the "down" file, for
> the case that a service should be visible to runit but not started by
> default)
At bootup (entering stage 2, more correct), every service in /etc/service is
started.
/etc/service contains symbolic links to /etc/sv/, so
> it appears that it's time for me to let the runit package go, so, hereby
> my acknowledgement to you to adopt the Debian runit package as new
> maintainer. I'm positively surprised that after all these years
> somebody still is motivated to bring runit integration into Debian
> forward. It wou
Hi Gianfranco,
Torsdag 30. juni 2016 13.56.15 skrev Gianfranco Costamagna:
> control: owner -1 !
> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> >I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python3-adns". This package is a
> >Debian packaging of the Python 3 port of python-adns, found at
> >>https://me
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 14:38:31 +0300, Dmitry Bogatov wrote:
>
> > how are runit features like disabled services (via the "down" file, for
> > the case that a service should be visible to runit but not started by
> > default)
>
> At bootup (entering stage 2, more correct), every service in /etc/
> My question was if log/run is automatically picked up if it exists, or
> needs to be installed with an additional command.
What is done:
* If you have following line in your PACKAGE.runit
enable debian/runscript-directory PACKAGE
you will have debian/runscript-directory recursive
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:56:03 + (UTC)
Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>
> I did *two* NMU of stockfish for this maintainer, both were new upstream
> release, and upstream was making pressure
> about updating it.
>
> So, even if the maintainer is not officially MIA, I guess you can already
> o
Hi,
I want to create a watch file for a package that contains a single text
file (which itself has the version into it):
--8
version=3
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/IAGA/vmod/igrf.html igrf(\d+)coeffs.txt \
debian debian/repackage.sh
---
Hi,
>Merging the Python 3 modifications into the Python 2 code would mean to make a
>lot of changes to the stable Python 2 code. There is a high likeliness that
>the >currently stable Python 2 code would not work correctly in some rare
>cases any more. So, it is better to leave the stable Pytho
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 16:00:47 + (UTC)
with message-id <1937971997.5821043.1468598447696.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#827090: RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #827090,
regarding RFS: runit/2.1.2-4 ITP
to be marked as done.
This me
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:34:10PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> I have addressed Mattia's comments regarding the tests and manpage. I
> am now happy with the state of the package and believe it to be fit for
> upload.
>
> The new version is available on mentors:
>
>
> https://mentors.debian
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: RC
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jigzo"
* Package name: jigzo
Version : 0.6.1-7
Upstream Author : Maarten de Boer
* URL : http://www.resorama.com/jigzo
* License : GPL-2+
Section
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 23:49:37 +0530
with message-id <1468606777.5939.12.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#829242: RFS: open-isns/0.96-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #829242,
regarding RFS: open-isns/0.96-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Fri, 15 Jul 2016 18:27:32 + (UTC)
with message-id <1307361273.1092004.1468607252079.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#831411: RFS: jigzo/0.6.1-7 RC
has caused the Debian Bug report #831411,
regarding RFS: jigzo/0.6.1-7 RC
to be marked as done.
This mean
19 matches
Mail list logo
