Bug#829571: marked as done (RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.3+ds-1 -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method)

2016-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:34:37 + (UTC) with message-id <179381224.3384490.1467707677696.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829571: RFS: gmp-ecm/7.0.3+ds-1 -- Factor integers using the Elliptic Curve Method has caused the Debian Bug report #829571, regarding RF

Bug#829543: marked as done (RFS: linkchecker/9.3-2 [QA])

2016-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:42:38 + (UTC) with message-id <915113160.3338320.1467708158652.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829543: Subject: RFS: linkchecker/9.3-2 [QA] has caused the Debian Bug report #829543, regarding RFS: linkchecker/9.3-2 [QA] to be marked

Bug#829208: RFS: evil-paredit-el/0.0.2-1 ITP

2016-07-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! >In my view evil-paredit-el is ready to be uploaded, bar `dch -r`. ping, G.

Bug#829456: RFS: jquery-throttle-debounce/1.1+dfsg.1-1

2016-07-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >Can you point me to specific parts that you want to be cleaner, and how >they should be cleaned? your rules file is 83 lines, most node packages are about 3-4 lines e.g. https://sources.debian.net/src/node-recast/0.11.4-2/debian/rules/ >Thank you for finding those, I will remove the file.

Bug#829648: marked as done (RFS: twinkle/1:1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1~bpo8+1 -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP)

2016-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 08:58:17 + (UTC) with message-id <1356478943.3400892.1467709097103.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829648: RFS: twinkle/1:1.9.0+git20160520.0.be8b8df+dfsg-1~bpo8+1 -- Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) SIP has caused the Debian Bug r

Bug#829674: RFS: libstroke/0.5.1-8 [QA, RC] -- mouse strokes library

2016-07-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Control: block 128745 by -1 Control: block 829027 by -1 Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload of libstroke, fixing a stretch RC bug. I have verified this QA upload in the following ways: - libstroke builds in a clean sid chroo

Bug#829674: RFS: libstroke/0.5.1-8 [QA, RC] -- mouse strokes library

2016-07-05 Thread Sean Whitton
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:13:10AM +, Sean Whitton wrote: > Download with dget: > > dget -x > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/lib/libstroke/libstroke_0.5.1-8.dsc Should be: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libs/libstroke/libstroke_0.5.1-8.dsc i.e. s/li

Bug#829674: marked as done (RFS: libstroke/0.5.1-8 [QA, RC] -- mouse strokes library)

2016-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 09:51:03 + (UTC) with message-id <1156970867.3478065.1467712263396.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829674: RFS: libstroke/0.5.1-8 [QA, RC] -- mouse strokes library has caused the Debian Bug report #829674, regarding RFS: libstroke/0.5.

Bug#829456: RFS: jquery-throttle-debounce/1.1+dfsg.1-1

2016-07-05 Thread Ben Finney
On 05-Jul-2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > >Can you point me to specific parts that you want to be cleaner, and how > >they should be cleaned? > > your rules file is 83 lines, most node packages are about 3-4 lines > e.g. > https://sources.debian.net/src/node-recast/0.11.4-2/debian/rules/

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

2016-07-05 Thread Ben Finney
On 03-Jul-2016, Paul Wise wrote: > You may want to talk to upstream about using argcomplete for automatic > bash completion instead of manually maintaining the bash completion > file separately to the existing argument parsing. That library is news to me, I will need to look into it. Thanks for t

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

2016-07-05 Thread Ben Finney
On 03-Jul-2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > why do you have some extra chars in your files? I don't know of any extra characters. Which ones do you think are extra? > your packaging seems full of bad line endings How did you detect bad line endings? I dont' see any reported from ‘file’:

Bug#829692: RFS: libu2f-host/1.1.2-0.1 [NMU] -- library for Universal 2nd Factor

2016-07-05 Thread Nicolas Braud-Santoni
X-Debbugs-CC: codeh...@debian.org Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU to the package libu2f-host. * Package name: libu2f-host Version : 1.1.2-0.1 Upstream Author : Yubico AG * URL : https://developers

Bug#829151: RFS: setcolortemperature/1.1-1 ITP

2016-07-05 Thread Sean Whitton
control: owner -1 ! control: tag -1 +moreinfo Dear Jacob, This looks like a nice alternative to redshift-gtk. Thanks for packaging it. I can't sponsor the upload, but I hope this review is useful to you. 1. Could you explain why you are packaging your fork rather then the original? (This k

Bug#829605: RFS: aspell-sk/2.02-0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

2016-07-05 Thread Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 05 July 2016 01:17:39 Jakub Wilk wrote: > Control: owner -1 ! > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > * Pali Rohár , 2016-07-04, 18:13: > >dget -x > >https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-sk/aspell-sk_2 > >.02-0-0.1.dsc > > > >Changes since the last upload: > > * Non-maintaine

Bug#829700: RFS: nvme-cli/0.8-1

2016-07-05 Thread Breno Leitao
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nvme-cli" * Package name: nvme-cli Version : 0.8-1 Upstream Author : Keith Busch * URL : https://github.com/linux-nvme/nvme-cli/ * License : GPL Section

QA for dvbackup

2016-07-05 Thread Herbert Fortes
Hi, I do not think this a practice, but telling that I will do a QA for dvbackup[0]. [0] - https://packages.qa.debian.org/d/dvbackup.html regards, -- Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#822634: RFS: magit-svn/2.1.1-1 [ITP]

2016-07-05 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Hi there. On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 05:23:20PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:43:41PM +0200, Alberto Luaces wrote: > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "magit-svn" > > o/ 1,5 months ago I provided a review of this. Are you still interested in getting this pac

Bug#829653: marked as done (RFS: caffe-contrib/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- cuda version of caffe [ITP])

2016-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 13:24:31 + (UTC) with message-id <1304227701.3668261.1467725071992.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829653: RFS: caffe-contrib/1.0.0~rc3-1 -- cuda version of caffe [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #829653, regarding RFS: caffe-con

Bug#829707: RFS: cdrdao/1:1.2.3-3 [QA, RC]

2016-07-05 Thread Gert Wollny
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for the package "cdrdao"  * Package name: cdrdao    Version : 1:1.2.3-3    Upstream Author : Manuel Clos ,                      Denis Leroy  * URL : http://cdrdao.sourceforge.net/

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

2016-07-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi >I don't know of any extra characters. Which ones do you think are >extra? >debian/rules: a /usr/bin/make -f script, > UTF-8 Unicode text executable I did leave only one of that "^L" lines hexdump debian/rules 000 0a0c 002 (attached) seems t

Bug#829707: marked as done (RFS: cdrdao/1:1.2.3-3 [QA, RC])

2016-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:11:07 + (UTC) with message-id <134748363.3730152.1467727867207.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829707: RFS: cdrdao/1:1.2.3-3 [QA, RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #829707, regarding RFS: cdrdao/1:1.2.3-3 [QA, RC] to be marked as

Bug#829700: marked as done (RFS: nvme-cli/0.8-1)

2016-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:30:25 + (UTC) with message-id <80899332.3909029.1467732625631.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#829700: RFS: nvme-cli/0.8-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #829700, regarding RFS: nvme-cli/0.8-1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1

2016-07-05 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, your package doesn't support arch:all builds... can you please prepare a new upload? (I'm afraid it will need to go in new queue :( ) G.

Re: Adding runtime dependencies that aren't caught by shlibs:Depends

2016-07-05 Thread Jens Reyer
On 28.05.2016 12:30, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Jens Reyer , 2016-05-27, 20:17: >> I think I have it working now in wine to automatically generate a list >> of runtime dependencies. I based it on Jakub's suggestions, however I >> didn't go for creating a "dependency binary". >> >> For one I did get resu

Weird unmet build dependencies on buildds

2016-07-05 Thread Ole Streicher
Hi, I am trying to get my package "dpuser" compiled. While this works nicely on my local pbuilder with up-to-date packages, it fails on the buildds: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=dpuser f.e. for i386: ---8<- Dependency installabil

Re: Weird unmet build dependencies on buildds

2016-07-05 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Ole Streicher , 2016-07-05, 21:26: Dependency installability problem for dpuser on i386: dpuser build-depends on: - i386:libvtk6-dev i386:libvtk6-dev depends on: - i386:python-vtk6 (= 6.3.0+dfsg1-1) i386:python-vtk6 depends on: - i386:python-twisted i386:python-twisted depends on: - i386:pytho

Re: Adding runtime dependencies that aren't caught by shlibs:Depends

2016-07-05 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jens Reyer , 2016-07-05, 21:24: First off, many thanks again for that script. Unfortunately it fails in Ubuntu (see #827770): ./debian/scripts/sonames2elf libcups.so.2 libdbus-1.so.3 libfontconfig.so.1 libfreetype.so.6 libGL.so.1 libgnutls.so.30 libgsm.so.1 libjpeg.so.8 libncurses.so.5 libo

Re: QA for dvbackup

2016-07-05 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:46:56AM -0300, Herbert Fortes wrote: > I do not think this a practice, but telling > that I will do a QA for dvbackup[0]. Indeed -- you just need to prepare the QA upload and file an RFS. If you want to ensure someone else doesn't try to fix the same bugs as you

Re: Bug#829605: RFS: aspell-sk/2.02-0-0.1 [RC, NMU]

2016-07-05 Thread Adam Borowski
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 02:28:30PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 05 July 2016 01:17:39 Jakub Wilk wrote: > > Did you need to do any packaging changes to update S-V? > > I wouldn't recommend updating S-V in an NMU. > > Well, Debian has in archives very old (maybe prehistoric) version of >