Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "linkchecker"
* Package name: linkchecker
Version : 9.3-2
Upstream Author : Bastian Kleineidam
* URL : https://wummel.github.io/linkchecker/
* License
On 2016-07-04 06:23, Herminio Hernandez Jr wrote:
> I have a question regarding managing patches. I am wondering is there
> a way to merge multiple patches into one or is there way to rollback
> from a patch?
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "rolling" back from a patch (that's
probably somethin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for a new release of git-remote-gcrypt.
Upstream asked for a new maintainer last year (although the GitHub issue
in which he made that request now 404s), and Joey Hess doesn't want to
be considered upstream,
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Sponsors,
I am looking for sponsorship for the Debian package gmp-ecm [1], a
mathematical
library that Factor[s] integers using the Elliptic Curve Method'. This
package
brings the lasted patch release of [gmp-]ecm.
Tha
Hi,
>Still nothing. I had read the page, but it mentions the format of the
>.commands file, and not dcut's CLI options. I also tried specifying the
>options in a different order, but I get the same error.
dcut ftp-master reschedule -d 0 -f newlisp_10.7.0-2_source.changes
this works for dpu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aspell-sk"
* Package name: aspell-sk
Version : 2.02-0-0.1
Upstream Author : Zdenko Podobný
* URL : http://www.sk-spell.sk.cx/aspell-sk
* License :
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jul 2016 16:30:16 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: stp/2.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Simple theorem prover
has caused the Debian Bug report #814680,
regarding RFS: stp/2.1.2+dfsg-1 [ITP] -- Simple theorem prover
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi Gianfranco
found information on
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736360 which seems to
suggest the problem was still contentious two years ago. Should I keep
overriding this warning?
I suggest to leave things as is
Ok
1) apt install check-all-the-things
codespell --qui
Mentors,
I placed an ITP for a package call mbpfan. I then made sure my package had
lintian errors and updated the change log noting that packaged fixes the ITP
bug and uploaded to the debian-mentors site. I then placed an RFS bug for the
package. This morning I received a notice that my ITP bu
On Monday, July 04 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
>>Still nothing. I had read the page, but it mentions the format of the
>>.commands file, and not dcut's CLI options. I also tried specifying the
>>options in a different order, but I get the same error.
>
>
> dcut ftp-master reschedule -d 0
On 07/04/2016 09:13 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote:
> I placed an ITP for a package call mbpfan. I then made sure my
> package had lintian errors and updated the change log noting that
> packaged fixes the ITP bug and uploaded to the debian-mentors site. I
> then placed an RFS bug for the packag
Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 4, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
>
>> On 07/04/2016 09:13 PM, Herminio Hernandez Jr. wrote:
>> I placed an ITP for a package call mbpfan. I then made sure my
>> package had lintian errors and updated the change log noting that
>> packaged fixes
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 09:25:02PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> So the RFS bug blocking the ITP is actually correct. In your case,
> someone was so nice to add the information that the RFS bug blocks
> the ITP bug for you.
FTR, that's an automated thing by bartm.
--
regards,
Your message dated Mon, 4 Jul 2016 23:32:02 +0200
with message-id <20160704213202.ga1...@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#823663: RFS: tio/1.6-1 [ITP] -- The simple TTY
terminal I/O application
has caused the Debian Bug report #823663,
regarding RFS: tio/1.20-1 [ITP] -- The simple TTY terminal
close 829568
thanks
--
Sean Whitton
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
* Pali Rohár , 2016-07-04, 18:13:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aspell-sk/aspell-sk_2.02-0-0.1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
* Non-maintainer upload.
* New upstream release (Closes: #603719).
debian/copyright say
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor to upload the package "twinkle" to
jessie-backports. I have been added to the backports ACL for
subsequent maintenance.
git clone https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-voip/twinkle.git
cd twinkle && pristine-tar
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it
, ghisv...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
This cuda version is basically synced with the CPU version in
packaging.
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caffe-contrib"
* Package name: caf
Well it seems that the first time mentors upload is going to FTBFS[1].
Hold on and I'll make an fixed upload.
the fix is to add flag -D_FORCE_INLINES to nvcc.
[1] dom-amd64: CUDA memcpy problem
--
Best,
Lumin
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it
Dear mentors,
Debomatic-amd64 build success[1]. As for 32-bit architecture
FTBFS issue of caffe, I'd cherry-pick upstream fix at next
time upload, synchronizing caffe and caffe-contrib packaging.
[1]
http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/caffe-contrib/1.0.0~rc3-1/buildlog
The lastest mentors package is fixed.
Please sponsor, thanks :-)
On 5 July 2016 at 03:30, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
> thi
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 06:48:16 + (UTC)
with message-id <928887238.3314965.1467701296724.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829454: RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #829454,
regarding RFS: xkcdpass/1.6.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jul 2016 06:50:58 + (UTC)
with message-id <99503832.3287950.1467701458184.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#829658: RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #829658,
regarding RFS: caffe/1.0.0~rc3-3
to be marked as done.
This means
23 matches
Mail list logo
