Good morning,
Dies schrieb Sean Whitton (spwhit...@spwhitton.name):
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 11:59:34PM +0200, Stefan Tomanek wrote:
> > Changes since the last upload:
> >
> >* update to version 0.4.0 (closes: bug#827079, bug#769184)
>
> Although this bug closing syntax is acceptable, i
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
[I don't intend to sponsor this package.]
* Stefan Tomanek , 2016-06-12, 23:59:
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/triggerhappy/triggerhappy_0.4.0-1.dsc
Bumping compat to 9 is not documented in the changelog.
Please double-check that all other changes a
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 06:12:12PM -0400, Martin Tůma wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the Debian GPXSee package
>
> Package name: gpxsee
> Version : 2.14
> Upstream Author : Martin Tůma
Eve
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dh-runit"
while I did some work on runit package a while ago, I'm not sure about
how you want the packages to use your new shiny dh call?
how do you plan to notify them about it?
do you plan to open a lot
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors, Gianfranco,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "skiboot". This is a packaging update
because I modified debian/copyright for 3 files.
Package name: skiboot
Version : 5.2.2-2
Upstream Author : skiboot team
URL
On 13 Jun 2016 00:03, "Stefan Tomanek"
wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "triggerhappy"
>
> * Package name: triggerhappy
>Version : 0.4.0-1
>Upstream Author : Stefan Tomanek
> * URL
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Here are some notes about the packaging:
debian/nlohmann-json-dev.doc-base:
"Document: json" is too generic, remember it must be unique.
debian/rules:
There is too many commented out dh_make example lines, you should remove
them if you don't need them.
debian/README.
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:42:31 + (UTC)
with message-id <913824122.3651939.1465821751845.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#827180: RFS: skiboot/5.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #827180,
regarding RFS: skiboot/5.2.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means t
> while I did some work on runit package a while ago, I'm not sure about
> how you want the packages to use your new shiny dh call?
> how do you plan to notify them about it?
> do you plan to open a lot of bugs for packages exposing a runit script?
First of all, runit supports (as policy requires
Your message dated Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:39:41 + (UTC)
with message-id <2066159211.3762751.1465825181441.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#827089: RFS: dh-runit/0.1 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #827089,
regarding RFS: dh-runit/0.1 ITP
to be marked as done.
This mean
control: owner -1 !
>Hi, could you please also ship my systemd integration (see upstream PR and
>branch)?
Andrew, do you plan to upload the package once this is fixed?
I see Jakub already did a wonderful review, and the current package on mentors
seems
to address his concerns.
I see your pul
On 13 June 2016 at 15:47, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> control: owner -1 !
>
>>Hi, could you please also ship my systemd integration (see upstream PR and
>>branch)?
>
>
> Andrew, do you plan to upload the package once this is fixed?
I think I could.
> I see Jakub already did a wonderful revie
Hi Jakub and Dmitry
(ccing you both, not sure if you are subscribed to the bug)
>You are probably[0] referring to:
>
>P: gdbm source: license-problem-gfdl-non-official-text doc/gdbm.info invariant
>part is: with no invariant sections, no front-cover, and no back-cover texts
>P: gdbm source: lice
control: owner -1 andrew.shado...@gmail.com
>I think I could.
setting you as owner :)
>There's https://github.com/wertarbyte/triggerhappy/commits/systemd but
>I haven't looked how much does it conflict with the master branch.
I did merge the systemd branch into master, and it merged correctly
control: owner -1 andre...@debian.org
(no idea why I was replying from a wrong email)
On 13 June 2016 at 16:03, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> control: owner -1 andrew.shado...@gmail.com
>
>>I think I could.
> setting you as owner :)
Thanks!
>>There's https://github.com/wertarbyte/triggerhapp
Hi,
>I deleted them and added notes about original maintainer for simplicity.
wonderful
>Applied above, then enabled pie explicitly for gol again to make package in
>good shape.
I see, nice!
>I'll apply patch when actually it is needed.
let me disagree a little bit :)
people might already
Hi Andrey,
thank you for your review!
On 06/13/2016 02:35 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> debian/nlohmann-json-dev.doc-base:
> "Document: json" is too generic, remember it must be unique.
fixed, it matches the package name nonw
> debian/rules:
> There is too many commented out dh_make example li
https://packages.debian.org/sid/xul-ext-iceweasel-branding
Can we do something to make this available to the users as soon as
possible? Now firefox-esr is out for stable users, too.
Also, we should consider adding a .desktop file to the package in order
to correct the inconsistent user experience
Hi,
>Can we do something to make this available to the users as soon as
>possible? Now firefox-esr is out for stable users, too.
the current package needs to migrate in testing first, and then you need to
check with
-release team if a stable-proposed-update is feasible or not
(I see esr is in w
Am 2016-06-13 17:06, schrieb Muri Nicanor:
On 06/13/2016 02:35 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
debian/copyright:
It has Files-Excluded: test/catch.hpp but the tarball still contains
this
file.
i don't know what i'm doing wrong. i've tried multiple sytaxes, but the
file somehow resists of being
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 05:06:55PM +0200, Muri Nicanor wrote:
> > debian/copyright:
> > It has Files-Excluded: test/catch.hpp but the tarball still contains this
> > file.
> i don't know what i'm doing wrong. i've tried multiple sytaxes, but the
> file somehow resists of being excluded of the tarba
Hi, fixed the summary
(please keep the RFS in cc, otherwise I can easily forget because the package
in this topic
is already sponsored)
>CPPFLAGS is actually for both c and cpp:
yep I know
>I can avoid "hardening-no-fortify-functions" only if there's a> CPPFLAGS in
>the cpp line.
sure
q
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
>I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit"
lets see
1)
+ * New maintainer
did Gerrit asked for help?
stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package.
(well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC)
2)
compat level 10 not
> + * New maintainer
> did Gerrit asked for help?
> stepping in as maintainer needs an RFH or Orphan package.
> (well, Gerrit was fine on giving up some packages IIRC)
Gerrit gave up fgetty (which I picked up), so I think he will be okay
with this. But explicit is better then implicit.
> compat
Hey,
question: what is the difference between
https://packages.qa.debian.org/s/snes9x.html
this package, and libretro-snes9x in this RFS?
is it the same package?
(not a problem in reintroducing it, but having the same package
with a different name is not easily discoverable by end users, I woul
On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 15:51 +, nord-stream wrote:
> https://packages.debian.org/sid/xul-ext-iceweasel-branding
>
> Can we do something to make this available to the users as soon as
> possible? Now firefox-esr is out for stable users, too.
I think perhaps you meant "stable users" in the firs
Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this Bug report.
This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.
Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will rep
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:11:00PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> backporting it is possible but useless I think.
Why do you think it would be useless? Because it's a trivial backport?
It's easier to install a trivial backport on a stable system than to
enable the testing repo and
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 04:28:13 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: triggerhappy/0.4.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #827149,
regarding RFS: triggerhappy/0.4.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 14 Jun 2016 04:28:13 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.4-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #827085,
regarding RFS: growl-for-linux/0.8.4-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
30 matches
Mail list logo
