src/ThirdParty and src/Library/RuleParser/quex contain embedded code
copies. Please ask upstream to remove them from their VCS and tarballs
and depend on them instead. You can then package them separately.
Alternatively, package them separately and remove all of them at
`debian/rules build` time b
Hi,
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:29:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> --
> capture.o: In function `tcl_capture':
> /<>/staden-2.0.0+b10/tk_utils/capture.c:31: warning: the use of
> `tmpnam' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
I've fix
Hi, some quick googling found some possible solutions
https://www.google.it/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=%22Scrt1.o%3A+In+function+`_start%27%3A%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=5ftHV7_JI8fA8geO-LmABQ
I remember having that issue on ettercap some years ago, this is how I fixed it
[1], but p
* Andreas Tille , 2016-05-27, 09:27:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/Scrt1.o: In function
`_start':
(.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
The command line that causes this is:
gcc -shared -g -O2 -fstack-protector-stron
Hello,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:55:07PM +0200, Jose Luis Blanco wrote:
> > Based on your description, it sounds like the -g packages might be
> > useful for someone. The only question is what you should call the
> > binary package. Are you saying that those packages already exist in
> > Debian
Hi Gianfranco,
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 07:53:45AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, some quick googling found some possible solutions
> https://www.google.it/search?client=ubuntu&channel=fs&q=%22Scrt1.o%3A+In+function+`_start%27%3A%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gfe_rd=cr&ei=5ftHV7_JI8fA8geO-LmABQ
>
* Jakub Wilk , 2016-05-27, 10:05:
gcc -shared -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -DUSE_NON_CONST -I/build/staden-2.0.0+b10/./tk_utils -I/build/staden-2.0.0+b10/./Misc
-I/build/staden-2.0.0+b10/./tk_utils -I/usr/include -I"/usr/includ
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:05:03AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Andreas Tille , 2016-05-27, 09:27:
> >>/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/Scrt1.o: In
> >>function `_start':
> >>(.text+0x20): undefined reference to `main'
> >>collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Th
Dear Emily,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 10:58:41AM -0500, Emily Ratliff wrote:
> I have attempted to make the package reproducibly buildable and have
> fixed some problems that were preventing that. However, there is still
> a problem of time stamps in the file list which I haven't been able to
> solv
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "nfft"
* Package name: nfft
Version : 3.3.2~rc1-1
Upstream Author : Prof. Dr. Daniel Potts
* URL :http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~potts/nfft/
* License : G
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-bitstring"
* Package name: python-bitstring
Version : 3.1.5-1
Upstream Author : Scott Griffiths
* URL : http://scott-griffiths.github.io/bitstring/
* Licen
* Sean Whitton , 2016-05-27, 17:15:
I think you should use a suffix other than -dbg because people expect
-dbg to be detached debugging symbols. You could write to
debian-de...@lists.debian.org and/or debian-mentors@lists.debian.org to
see if anyone is aware of a precedent;
Hey, we are alread
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "cdist"
* Package name: cdist
Version : 4.0.0-2
Upstream Author : Nico Schottelius
* Url : http://www.nico.schottelius.org/software/cdist/
* Licenses: GP
On 23 May 2016 18:12, "Pali Rohár" wrote:
>
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "udfclient"
>
> * Package name: udfclient
>Version : 0.8.5-1
>Upstream Author : Reinoud Zandijk
> * URL
On Friday 27 May 2016 13:10:26 Andrew Shadura wrote:
> I'll have a look.
Now it is in sid: https://packages.debian.org/sid/udfclient
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Updated:
* Reworded the description.
* There is no override anymore, although this is not yet perfect. The
package *generates* files using various tools. The Debian policy
requires the inclusion of source files. Thus this package can't be like
a typical simple add-on package.
* Corrected the change
Thanks, this did the trick.
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:43 PM Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:10:43AM +, Nico Schlömer wrote:
> > Thanks for the hint.
> > Unfortunately, it's not working dpt picks up an older version that
> already
> > is in pristine-tar and adds another com
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:32 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> Hi, alternative proposal
>
>>Now I understand my todo-list, briefly:
>>- package libraries first: libcork/ipset
>>- create debian/watch and ds repack
>>- RFS shadowsocks-libev
>>- apply for collab-maint access
>
> - open ITP bugs f
package: sponsorship-requests
severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com, max.c...@gmail.com, 073p...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "shadowsocks-libev"
* Package name: shadowsocks-libev
Version : 2.4.6+20160526+ds-1
Upstream Aut
package: sponsorship-requests
severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: rogershim...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcork"
* Package name: libcork
Version : 0.15.0+ds-1
Upstream Author : Douglas Creager
* URL : http://libcork.readthed
Control: block -1 by 825531
Hi Gert,
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 04:27:25PM +0200, Gert Wollny wrote:
> ...
> Removing the file INCLUDE/f2c.h solves the problem, because then the
> ...
This tip saved my evening yesterday - thanks a lot. The only remaining
issue is now
E: libclapack3: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
usr/li
Hi,
> E: libclapack3: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libclapack.so.3.2.1
> /build/clapack-3.2.1+dfsg/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/BLAS/SRC
>Is there any trick how I could tweak cmake files to prevent the
>inclusion of rpath or is the only chance to solve this to use
>
>
Em 23-05-2016 6:22, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
Hi Carlos!
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 07:30:51PM +, James Cowgill wrote:
I have a few comments on this pavkage.
This was Feb 16, more than 3 months ago, but with no replies from you.
Are you still interested in this package?
Hello Mattia,
I apo
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 19:23:48 +0200
with message-id <20160527172348.ga8...@jwilk.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#825236: RFS: openfst/1.5.3-1 -- weighted finite-state
transducers library
has caused the Debian Bug report #825236,
regarding RFS: openfst/1.5.3-1 -- weighted finite-state
On 05/19/2016 05:53 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jens Reyer , 2016-05-19, 16:57:
>> First off, I'm not sure about every single dependency if it is needed
>> at all.
>
> Quick grep over the *.dll.so indeed shows that they use a bunch of
> libraries you mentioned:
[...]
> I guess a better method of obt
Many thanks Paul for your review - even though you do not wish to sponsor
this, your review has been very valuable.
I've addressed your comments as discussed below.
Looking on the mentors / mypackages webpage it says that the watch file
I've included does not work. This is very strange because I
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-regenerate"
* Package name: node-regenerate
Version : 1.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Mathias Bynens
* URL : https://github.com/mathiasbynens/regenerate
*
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 20:23:26 + (UTC)
with message-id <891159034.939441.1464380606966.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825491: RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825491,
regarding RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.5-1
to be marked as do
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 20:23:08 + (UTC)
with message-id <846161236.912536.1464380588038.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825490: RFS: nfft/3.3.2~rc1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825490,
regarding RFS: nfft/3.3.2~rc1-1
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 20:27:10 + (UTC)
with message-id <1210816248.589190.1464380830973.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825559: RFS: node-regenerate/1.3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #825559,
regarding RFS: node-regenerate/1.3.0-1
to be marked as don
Your message dated Fri, 27 May 2016 20:33:25 + (UTC)
with message-id <529850055.930068.1464381205944.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#825509: RFS: cdist/4.0.0-2 ITP
has caused the Debian Bug report #825509,
regarding RFS: cdist/4.0.0-2 ITP
to be marked as done.
This mean
> the rationale is:
> what you have on git is different from what is in unstable.
>
> I had to change UNRELEASED to unstable
> and to change the timestamp of the -1 version
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/kaction-guest/cdist.git/commit/?id=3D=
> 3527e379aad6e7d2621652b308676e000e7f866b
>
>
Hello,
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:02:32PM +, nord-stream wrote:
> Updated:
> * Reworded the description.
Great. It's really clear now.
>
> * There is no override anymore, although this is not yet perfect. The
> package *generates* files using various tools. The Debian policy
> requires the
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 08:38:02AM +0900, Sean Whitton wrote:
> It needs to close the RFS bug! E.g.
The ITP bug**
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:17 AM, Jens Reyer wrote:
> Then (instead of creating a binary linking to the required
> libraries and running dpkg-shlibdeps on this) I replicate things
> from dpkg-shlibdeps(1) to identify the library package names for
> these sonames:
I wonder if the best solution woul
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> I think you should use a suffix other than -dbg because people expect
> -dbg to be detached debugging symbols.
I would go with either -dbg (slight preference) or -debug.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
37 matches
Mail list logo
