The current maintainer of scantailor filed a RFA (bug #816504) and I
would like to take over maintainership. I have not packaged for Debian
before but I think I mostly understand the process. I still have to fix
a couple things, but I've managed to make a .deb for a recently released
version that
Hello,
looking at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745732
which has been languishing for two years, it looks like the pkg-fonts
team could need some help to maintain this package.
This new upstream version is needed by at least two other fonts, one
of which has a serious bug (#82
* Adam Borowski , 2016-04-27, 05:27:
export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=`grep ^processor /proc/cpuinfo|wc -l`
Refuse the temptation to parse /proc/cpuinfo. Use nproc(1) instead.
--
Jakub Wilk
Hi, some general notes:
Adam, do you plan to sponsor the package? in this case can I set you as owner?
:)
Fabian, why are you trying to package an upstream snapshot?
(not asking to package 1.5.1, I'm just wondering about why a new library should
eventually enter Debian in a snapshot form)
chee
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 11:40:47AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Adam Borowski , 2016-04-27, 05:27:
> >export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=`grep ^processor /proc/cpuinfo|wc -l`
>
> Refuse the temptation to parse /proc/cpuinfo. Use nproc(1) instead.
Oh, that's something new (for the value of "new" of
Control: owner -1 !
Am 26.04.2016 um 12:10 schrieb Shlomi Fish:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freecell-solver"
Hi Shlomi,
First of all thank you for updating freecell-solver. Your effort is much
appreciated.
Control: owner -1 !
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:45:18AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Adam, do you plan to sponsor the package? in this case can I set you as
> owner? :)
Sure, can do. I did most of the review already, and if we decide otherwise
wrt 1.6-pre1, can always unset.
> Fabian,
Hi Adam,
>Sure, can do. I did most of the review already, and if we decide otherwise
>wrt 1.6-pre1, can always unset.
thanks a lot for that, it helps in avoiding double checking of packages :)
and double reviews :D
># Note that 1.6 is bleeding edge and still needs polishing before it can
># r
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for package "pidgin-sipe", whose source code is at:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/pidgin-sipe.git
or you may also:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-sipe/pidgin
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Jason Crain wrote:
> The current maintainer of scantailor filed a RFA (bug #816504) and I
> would like to take over maintainership. I have not packaged for Debian
> before but I think I mostly understand the process. I still have to fix
> a couple things, but I'v
* Adam Borowski , 2016-04-27, 12:02:
export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=`grep ^processor /proc/cpuinfo|wc -l`
Refuse the temptation to parse /proc/cpuinfo. Use nproc(1) instead.
Oh, that's something new (for the value of "new" of "added upstream on
2009-11-06, to Debian in 8.1-1 for squeeze").
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> looking at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745732
> which has been languishing for two years, it looks like the pkg-fonts
> team could need some help to maintain this package.
There has been some efforts around this recen
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> And for stretch, there's "dpkg-buildpackage -Jauto" (not to be confused with
> -jauto, which is evil).
-jauto replaces auto with the number of processors.
Why is that evil?
What does -Jauto do?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> First of all thank you for updating freecell-solver. Your effort is much
> appreciated. I intend to sponsor your package and to upload it to the
> DELAYED/10 queue, should there be no reaction from the maintainer within
> the next couple of
Control: noowner -1 !
Am 27.04.2016 um 12:44 schrieb Paul Wise:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> First of all thank you for updating freecell-solver. Your effort is much
>> appreciated. I intend to sponsor your package and to upload it to the
>> DELAYED/10 queue, sho
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jakub,
can you please explain the changes below (to me or in changelog)
-usr/lib/*/purple-2/libsipe.so usr/lib/purple-2
-usr/share/locale/*
-usr/share/pixmaps/*
-DEB_CONFIGURE_EXTRA_FLAGS := --enable-purple --disable-telepathy
--enable-openssl
Hi Pali and mentors,
(redirecting the question to -mentors, because I don't have a strong opinion on
this)
>Looks like we do not have exact license text as those file "were
>generated" by brute-force methods by more people and put into public
>domain. People names (or nick names) are already in
Hi, the packaging seems good now, I would like to ask you a final question:
how do you feel about using the same license for debian packaging and upstream?
(asking about changing GPL-3+ to MIT).
Forwarding patches otherwise would be impossible without a relicense.
and the copyright still needs t
Hi Gianfranco,
thanks for your review.
On 04/27/2016 01:28 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> can you please explain the changes below (to me or in changelog)
>
> -usr/lib/*/purple-2/libsipe.so usr/lib/purple-2
> -usr/share/locale/*
> -usr/share/pixmaps/*
After removing pidgin-sipe-dbg, pidgin-
On Wednesday 27 April 2016 13:01:20 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> >So in this case, how to update copyright? Just for src/lzma? Or for all
> >other embedded libraries even when they are not used and needed?
>
> you have to list *every* copyright and license on copyright file, regardless
> of it b
Hi everyone,
thanks for the reviews!
> Fabian, why are you trying to package an upstream snapshot?
> (not asking to package 1.5.1, I'm just wondering about why a new library
> should
> eventually enter Debian in a snapshot form)
I'm not packaging a random snapshot. I have based the package on t
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:59:31 + (UTC)
with message-id <210962072.5188270.1461765571288.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#822770: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.21.0-1 -- Pidgin plugin for
MS Office Communicator and MS Lync
has caused the Debian Bug report #822770,
rega
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:12:34 +0200
Markus Koschany wrote:
> Control: noowner -1 !
>
> Am 27.04.2016 um 12:44 schrieb Paul Wise:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >
> >> First of all thank you for updating freecell-solver. Your effort is much
> >> appreciated. I int
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Control: block 822535 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an update to ocrmypdf.
* Package name: ocrmypdf
Version : 4.0.7-2
Upstream Author : James R. Barlow
* URL : https://github.com/jbarlow83/OCRmyPDF
*
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 15:44:29 +
with message-id <20160427154429.ga6...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#822794: RFS: ocrmypdf/4.0.7-2 -- add an OCR text layer
to PDF files
has caused the Debian Bug report #822794,
regarding RFS: ocrmypdf/4.0.7-2 -- add an OCR text lay
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:40:59PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Adam Borowski , 2016-04-27, 12:02:
> >>>export DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=`grep ^processor /proc/cpuinfo|wc -l`
> >>Refuse the temptation to parse /proc/cpuinfo. Use nproc(1) instead.
> >Oh, that's something new (for the value of "new"
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:52:18AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, source-only uploaded :)
Thanks. I'm sure you realised that I had you and mapreri in mind when I
wrote "Note to sponsors using deb-o-matic" ;)
>
> I also think the bug is in DoM, so I would like to see how build
control: tags -1 pending
control: tags -1 patch
Hi, I followed up on 822393 and uploaded a patch on deferred/5.
I did also import the new 1.32 release, dropping the two cherry-picks from the
upstream git.
the patch is the following
Index: connman-1.32/src/firewall.c
==
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 17:12:22 + (UTC)
with message-id <2118046859.5312113.1461777142688.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#816542: RFS: connman/1.31-0.1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #816542,
regarding RFS: connman/1.21-1.3 [RC]
to be marked as done.
Hi Martin, sorry for the lag
>>For python-tldp (source) which creates python3-tldp (binary):
>Rename the upstream or change the name of the source package in
>debian/control to say 'tldp'?
just the changelog and control file (Source section)
the binary is good called python-tldp
>OK. I wi
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:18:23 + (UTC)
with message-id <1656210730.5389326.1461781103263.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#814291: RFS: libneo4j-client/0.8.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #814291,
regarding RFS: libneo4j-client/0.9.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:27:13 + (UTC)
with message-id <614542862.5442518.1461781633546.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#821220: RFS: python-django-tagging [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #821220,
regarding RFS: python-django-tagging [NMU] [RC]
t
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:34:05 + (UTC)
with message-id <1645436211.5475357.1461782045378.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#820543: RFS: python-django-feincms [NMU] [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #820543,
regarding RFS: python-django-feincms [NMU] [RC]
Your message dated Wed, 27 Apr 2016 19:50:51 +
with message-id <5721181b.5030...@rezozer.net>
and subject line RFS: bliss/0.73-1 [ITA] - library to compute graph
automorphisms and labelings
has caused the Debian Bug report #822524,
regarding RFS: bliss/0.73-1 [ITA] - library to compute graph a
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 06:39:11PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Jason Crain wrote:
>
> > I have a question about Alioth though. The debian package is being
> > maintained at (http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/scantailor.git).
> > Can I get access to that,
Hello and greetings again Gianfranco,
No problem at all. I wandered around a bit, have made a mistake or
two, improved my package (I think), filed an RFS (in the wrong way
[0]), and of course the ITP [1], but have started to get a feel for
how the whole process is supposed to work.
>just the
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 05:27:37AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> I'm afraid that it builds only on 64-bit architectures (I tried amd64 and
> arm64), on 32-bit ones (x32 armhf i386) it fails with:
>
> [...]
>
> Also, it'd be nice if you added --parallel to the dh call, it massively
> speeds up bui
Your message dated Thu, 28 Apr 2016 03:08:09 +0200
with message-id <20160428010809.ga15...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#822728: RFS: libtcod/1.6.0~pre1+dfsg-1 [ITP] --
graphics and utility library for roguelike developers
has caused the Debian Bug report #822728,
regarding RFS: libtcod/1.6
38 matches
Mail list logo
