Re: Bug#818974: packaging

On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:10:28 Roderick MacKenzie wrote: > I've now used license-reconcile and a bit of copy and paste from > hedgewars to sort out the copyright file. You can also try "cme update dpkg-copyright". See https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/wiki/Updating-debian-copyright-fi

Bug#822360: marked as done (RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-3 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:14:18 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#822360: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-3 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool has caused the Debian Bug report #822360, regarding RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668-3 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool to be

Bug#822362: RFS: mitlm/0.4-2 -- MIT Language Modeling toolkit

* Giulio Paci , 2016-04-24, 01:13: + * Update Source field in copyright. Policy §12.5 says that the “the copyright file must say where the upstream sources (if any) were obtained”, but they are not available (and never were AIUI) at the new location. So I think keeping the original Source wou

Re: noopt not working

* Shawn Sörbom , 2016-04-23, 15:28: The problem is that optimization appears to cause a segfault during runtime. I'd normally advise fixing the root cause of segfault, instead of disabling optimization, ... https://github.com/devshane/zork ... but trying to wrap your head around this code

Re: Bug#818974: packaging

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:06:26AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > You can also try "cme update dpkg-copyright". > > See > https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/wiki/Updating-debian-copyright-file-with-cme > for instructions, Bad advice, I'm afraid. Here's a typical result of using cme: htt

if a changelog is on a wiki, does the debian package need a local version?

Hi, If a package's changelog is published on a wiki, is it still necessary and/or desirable to ship a changelog with the Debian package? If yes, is something like the following the best solution: curl https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog | html2text | sed '0,/(announcement)/d;/By ve

Bug#816542: RFS: connman/1.31-0.1 [RC]

Pong back. http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/connman/connman_1.21-1.3.dsc I was tested it on Ubuntu 16.04 and all is fine.

Re: if a changelog is on a wiki, does the debian package need a local version?

* Nicholas D Steeves , 2016-04-24, 08:02: If a package's changelog is published on a wiki, is it still necessary and/or desirable to ship a changelog with the Debian package? It's not strictly necessary, but it is desirable. If yes, is something like the following the best solution: curl htt

Bug#822362: RFS: mitlm/0.4-2 -- MIT Language Modeling toolkit

Il 24/apr/2016 12:54, "Jakub Wilk" ha scritto: > > * Giulio Paci , 2016-04-24, 01:13: > + * Update Source field in copyright. >>> >>> Policy §12.5 says that the “the copyright file must say where the upstream sources (if any) were obtained”, but they are not available (and never were AIUI) a

Bug#822362: marked as done (RFS: mitlm/0.4-2 -- MIT Language Modeling toolkit)

Your message dated Sun, 24 Apr 2016 16:45:07 +0200 with message-id <20160424144507.ga5...@jwilk.net> and subject line Re: Bug#822362: RFS: mitlm/0.4-2 -- MIT Language Modeling toolkit has caused the Debian Bug report #822362, regarding RFS: mitlm/0.4-2 -- MIT Language Modeling toolkit to be marked

Re: noopt not working

On Sunday, April 24, 2016 13:22:59 Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Shawn Sörbom , 2016-04-23, 15:28: > >The problem is that optimization appears to cause a segfault during > >runtime. > > I'd normally advise fixing the root cause of segfault, instead of > disabling optimization, ... > > >https://github.com

Re: Seeking Sponsors for my package - roadfighter

On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 01:49 -0300, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote: > My problem is in upstream Makefile which causes some lintian. Generally, problems with upstream code or build systems should be fixed by sending upstream a patch and asking them for a new release. If they don't respond, then you ca

Bug#819615: RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool

Still looking for a sponsor for the spin verification tool. I added a spin-dbg binary package to the mix earlier today: http://mentors.debian.net/package/spin Builds fine in pbuilder, is lint clean, etc. Appreciate reviews too! -- *Tom Lee */ http://tomlee.co / @tglee

Re: Bug#816542: RFS: connman/1.31-0.1 [RC]

On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 02:19:59PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > Pong back. > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/connman/connman_1.21-1.3.dsc > > I was tested it on Ubuntu 16.04 and all is fine. But alas, it doesn't build on current unstable. #822393 which looks like a problem bet

Bug#822524: RFS: bliss/0.73-1 [ITA] - library to compute graph automorphisms and labelings

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear Sponsor, I am looking for a sponsor for the Debian package bliss [1]. This package version brings to Debian the latest release and refresh the Debian material. Thanks in advance, Jerome [1] https://anonscm.debian.org/cg