Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyfr"
* Package name: pyfr
Version : 1.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Imperial College London
* URL : http://www.pyfr.org
* License : BSD
Section : sc
Am 18.04.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Ben Finney:
> Markus Koschany writes:
>
>> I had a look at your package and wanted to give you some feedback
>> because of the effort you put into packaging this game.
>
> Thank you! Are you a prospective sponsor of this package?
Yes, I would sponsor the package i
Hi,
Thanks again for your review.
I've uploaded a new version. Some comments below:
Le vendredi 15 avril 2016 à 13:38 +, Gianfranco Costamagna a
écrit :
> Hi again,
>
> >
> > There is only one binary which is installed with 'dh_install'
> > Upstream's 'make install' installs the binary in '/
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:43:55 +0200
with message-id <20160418074355.GA27600@localhost>
and subject line Re: Bug#821370: RFS: pyfr/1.3.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #821370,
regarding RFS: pyfr/1.3.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
control: owner -1 a...@debian.org
Hi Markus!
>Yes, I would sponsor the package if we can resolve the remaining issues.
(setting you as owner, to avoid double reviews by other potential sponsors)
thanks for your work, and sorry for the noise!
Gianfranco
>> The vim comments at the bottom ar
Am 18.04.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Ben Finney:
[...]
>> I found the following things with check-all-the-things:
>>
>> colossal-cave-adventure.desktop: found with desktop-file-validate
>> error: value "adventure;advent;colossal;cave;spelunk" for locale string
>> list key "Keywords" in group "Desktop Ent
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:25 PM, nord-stream wrote:
> * Package name: firefox-branding-iceweasel
Thoughts:
Should the vendorShortName be Debian instead of Mozilla?
One thing that isn't rebranded is the window icon, when I do alt-tab I
get the Firefox icon.
Automatic checks:
Build:
...
m
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Jeremy Davis
> Anyway, the version of Adminer in Jessie is really old.
That is the expected situation, software in stable is almost never
updated to the latest upstream version, but only gets targeted patches
for security and other important issues.
> there is a
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> customize the new Iceweasel look
I suspect this should be s/Iceweasel/Firefox/ now?
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Uh... isn't that something more for upstream than for me?
> Again, that's for upstream.
Yes, however it would be great if you could file bugs/patches and or
work with upstream to include those tools into their QA procedures.
> See above : up
On Friday 15 April 2016 16:16:34 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> *too* many embedded libraries, please try to exclude them, or list the
> copyrights correctly.
>
> libtomcrypt
> libtommath
> bzip2
> zlib
> lzma
Upstream tarball comes with all those embedded libraries included. But
for Debian we u
On Friday 15 April 2016 16:21:16 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> please also try to fix lintian and symbols
> http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#unstable/stormlib/9.20-1/lintian
source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary storm_dll/storm.dll
==> Not possible, problem with original upstream
On Friday 15 April 2016 16:29:24 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> some questisons:
> std-version
> section extra? maybe optional?
I have no opinion about section. So change it to optional?
> why this package is not depending on anything else?
Because this package contains just text files, needed t
Hi,
On 18/04/2016 11:48, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Julien Puydt wrote:
Uh... isn't that something more for upstream than for me?
Again, that's for upstream.
Yes, however it would be great if you could file bugs/patches and or
work with upstream to include those tools
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:30:05 +0100
with message-id <5714c53d.2040...@rezozer.net>
and subject line Re: RFS: gap-io/3.4.4+ds-2 [DUMPtoGAP4r8] - low level C
library IO bindings for GAP
has caused the Debian Bug report #821256,
regarding RFS: gap-io/3.4.4+ds-2 [DUMPtoGAP4r8] - low lev
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:31:07 +0100
with message-id <5714c57b.9090...@rezozer.net>
and subject line Re: RFS: gap-grape/4.7+ds-2 [REPRODUCIBLE] - GRaph Algorithms
using PErmutation groups for GAP
has caused the Debian Bug report #821348,
regarding RFS: gap-grape/4.7+ds-2 [REPRODUCIBL
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 12:30:44 +0100
with message-id <5714c564.9090...@rezozer.net>
and subject line Re: RFS: gap-float/0.6.3+ds-2 [DUMPtoGAP4r8] - multi-precision
floating-point computation for GAP
has caused the Debian Bug report #821300,
regarding RFS: gap-float/0.6.3+ds-2 [DUMPto
tags 816192 - moreinfo
thanks
I have migrated it again to DPMT and
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/python3-proselint.git/
Now the package is ready for RFS :)
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:05:26 + (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
>
> done, with a comment from
> [15:58]
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "timelimit"
* Package name: timelimit
Version : 1.8.1-1
Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev (myself)
* URL : http://devel.ringlet.net/sysutils/timelimit/
* License
Hi Jakub and all,
I noticed that openfst 1.5.2-1 [0] is failing to build on mips and
mipsel architectures [1].
You already pointed out that algo_test.cc compilation requires more than 2GB on
i386, and we already set some reasonable limits for parallel builds to cope
with several
possibl
On 18/04/16 08:05, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 3:25 PM, nord-stream wrote:
>
>> * Package name: firefox-branding-iceweasel
>
> Thoughts:
>
> Should the vendorShortName be Debian instead of Mozilla?
I think that file was copied as-is from the last Iceweasel source package.
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:36:46 + (UTC)
with message-id <2102603961.4073223.1460993806117.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#816192: RFS: proselint/0.3.5-1 [ITP] -- A prose linter
has caused the Debian Bug report #816192,
regarding RFS: python3-proselint/0.3.5-
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:36:12 + (UTC)
with message-id <95471228.4136517.1460993772833.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#821310: RFS: aggressive-indent-mode/1.6-1 -- Emacs
minor mode that reindents code after every change
has caused the Debian Bug report #82
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:41:10 + (UTC)
with message-id <839250042.4154368.1460994070855.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#821390: RFS: timelimit/1.8.1-1 -- new upstream,
updated packaging
has caused the Debian Bug report #821390,
regarding RFS: timelimit/1.8
Hi
>I have no opinion about section. So change it to optional?
I think you should
>Because this package contains just text files, needed to build reverse
>hash table with file names for old mpq archives. There is no need to
>depend on something.
ok
>But package smpq depends on this package. It
Hi,
>source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary storm_dll/storm.dll
>==> Not possible, problem with original upstream tarball
you can, google for "debian source" repack.
Anyway, since this isn't a license violation, nevermind!
>debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature
>==> Not possible, upstream doe
Hi, MIA team is aware now.
If you want to contribute, just send your package (source.changes) to
mentors.debian.net
and open an RFS bug to have an NMU in debian (the accept mail has a link for
the RFS template).
fix the RC bug, and the other bugs (optioally update to the new release), and
look
On Monday 18 April 2016 17:58:03 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary storm_dll/storm.dll
> >==> Not possible, problem with original upstream tarball
>
> you can, google for "debian source" repack.
> Anyway, since this isn't a license violation, nevermin
Hi Pali,
>Ehm... repacking is ugly!
I agree here
>Ok, I can ask, but I doubt that upstream will do that. This is windows
>project and in windows world is PGP not supported by Visual Studio/MS.
>(We can be happy that library working fine under linux with gcc :-))
asking is free :)
> >harde
On Monday 18 April 2016 17:53:32 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi
>
> >I have no opinion about section. So change it to optional?
>
> I think you should
Ok, I will change it.
> >So what do you suggest? What is common in this such case?
>
> use for debian packaging the same upstream license.
And I have another question, how to version this package? Upstream does
not have any versioning, just drop "last" updated package to web. But it
provides HTTP "Last-Modified:" header when GETting or HEADing file. And
this date (separated by hyphen) I used for Debian version. Is that OK,
or is t
(also stormlib needs to have optional priority BTW)
>
>Files are under public domain. Mark then debian files under public
>domain too?
yes, if you are fine with that license.
it is up to you, not to me :)
>I'm not lawyer and really do not know how to check trademark violation
>or similar th
On Monday 18 April 2016 18:31:42 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Pali,
>
> >Ehm... repacking is ugly!
>
> I agree here
>
> >Ok, I can ask, but I doubt that upstream will do that. This is
> >windows project and in windows world is PGP not supported by Visual
> >Studio/MS. (We can be happy that
mmm maybe by doing something lie:
0.0.0~20150420
or ask them to put some sort of versioning, otherwise, how could
them notify users about new releases?
g.
Il Lunedì 18 Aprile 2016 18:36, Pali Rohár ha scritto:
And I have another question, how to version this package? Upstream does
not have
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:54:29 + (UTC)
with message-id <134893001.4261460.1460998469903.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#810012: RFS: averell/1.2.4-1 ITP 773793
has caused the Debian Bug report #810012,
regarding RFS: averell/1.2.5-1 [ITP]
to be marked as do
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:53:55 + (UTC)
with message-id <1105585942.4276411.1460998435263.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#811393: Another try at flint-arb sponsoring
has caused the Debian Bug report #811393,
regarding RFS: flint/2.5.2-4 -- C library for arbi
* Gianfranco Costamagna , 2016-04-18, 16:48:
mmm maybe by doing something lie:
0.0.0~20150420
Surely just one leading zero is enough...
--
Jakub Wilk
Hi,
>You are looking at wrong file! We do not use Makefile.linux, but
>CMakeLists.txt. And then cmake in /<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu
>directory generate own Makefile, nothing from Makefile.linux.
ok, so maybe this might be a question for -mentors.
did you try to make the debhelper dependency m
Hi,
>> BTW one single symbol file please>I recommend using the C++ support in
>> dpkg-gensymbols to achieve this,
>it is better than restricting particular symbols to particular arches
>etc.
this has to be read as:
"one single symbol file that covers every architectures please"
anyway, please
Hi again
>ok, so maybe this might be a question for -mentors.>did you try to make the
>debhelper dependency more explicit?
>e.g. >= 9.0.whatever
>
>IIRC some checks were added based on the debhelper version
When building programs that handle untrusted data (parsers, network listeners,
etc.),
On Monday 18 April 2016 18:48:26 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> mmm maybe by doing something lie:
> 0.0.0~20150420
Ok, I change it to that string.
I do not care about versioning scheme. If there is some convention I
will use it...
> or ask them to put some sort of versioning,
I can ask, but I
Hi
>> 0.0.0~20150420
>
>Ok, I change it to that string.
as said by Jakub, 0~20150420 is already fine
>I do not care about versioning scheme. If there is some convention I
>will use it...
wonderful
>> or ask them to put some sort of versioning,
>
>I can ask, but I do not expect any change...
Your message dated Mon, 18 Apr 2016 17:14:44 + (UTC)
with message-id <1894479731.4204644.1460999684480.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#821309: RFS: flint/2.5.2-4 as *source* to
*experimental*
has caused the Debian Bug report #821309,
regarding RFS: flint/2.5.2-4 as *sou
Hi,
I tried to address the issues from the first review for V0.0.0 at
http://mentors.debian.net/package/logdata-anomaly-miner, the changes are now
in the V0.0.2~pre0 package uploaded.
But still there are some points not completely clear to me:
Issues from https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-polic
nord-stream writes:
> It builds those binary packages:
>
> firefox-branding-iceweasel - Preserves Iceweasel branding for new Firefox
> packages
Please change the description synopsis, to conform to the Developer's
Reference §6.2.2.
That entails that it should not be a sentence itself, but a
On Monday 18 April 2016 19:09:49 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi
>
> >> 0.0.0~20150420
> >
> >Ok, I change it to that string.
>
> as said by Jakub, 0~20150420 is already fine
I did not get any email from Jakub.
Anyway, now I updated stormlib-listfiles package on mentors.debian.net.
--
Pali
On Monday 18 April 2016 19:08:09 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi again
>
> >ok, so maybe this might be a question for -mentors.>did you try to
> >make the debhelper dependency more explicit? e.g. >= 9.0.whatever
> >
> >IIRC some checks were added based on the debhelper version
>
> When building
* Giulio Paci , 2016-04-18, 16:16:
I noticed that openfst 1.5.2-1 [0] is failing to build on mips and
mipsel architectures [1].
You already pointed out that algo_test.cc compilation requires more
than 2GB on i386, and we already set some reasonable limits for
parallel builds to cope with seve
The package is mostly fine. Here are some points:
- binary package name should be xul-ext-iceweasel-branding or similar
- is it possible to generalise this to restore both icedove and
iceweasel branding in one binary package? (icedove will soon become
thunderbird)
- don't install the MPL-*
Now I updated stormlib package on mentors.debian.net.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:47:19PM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi, MIA team is aware now.
yep, the MIA team is "aware", but happens that team members also read
this mailing list :P
I see that maintainer maintains 2 packages, and he did his last upload
about one year ago.
You said you t
Still a copyright issue
W missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright
public-domain (paragraph at line 17)
G.
Il Lunedì 18 Aprile 2016 21:33, Pali Rohár ha scritto:
On Monday 18 April 2016 19:09:49 Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi
>
> >> 0.0.0~20150420
> >
> >Ok, I change it to that string
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:30:37PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I suspect this should be s/Iceweasel/Firefox/ now?
Thanks. Fixed in git ready for the next upload.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hello,
I just took a closer look at your debian/rules file. You don't need the
boilerplate. This is enough:
,
| #!/usr/bin/make -f
|
| %:
| dh $@ --with xul-ext --parallel
|
| override_dh_auto_install:
| xpi-pack ./xpi-build ./build.xpi
| install-xpi ./build.xpi
`
H
Howdy Markus,
(Limiting distribution just to the RFS bug report to discuss the
sponsorship.)
Markus Koschany writes:
> Am 18.04.2016 um 02:15 schrieb Ben Finney:
> > Those are in end-line comments (“# foo”). My understanding is that
> > end-line comments with that syntax are permitted in any De
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for an update to ublock-origin.
* Package name: ublock-origin
Version : 1.6.8+dfsg-1
Upstream Author : Raymond Hill
* URL : https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock
* License : GP
56 matches
Mail list logo
