Re: Bug#820879: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, I remember having used dh_linktree, but I forgot when and where does this helps? https://codesearch.debian.net/results/dh_linktree/page_0 in the first page there are some examples of fonts linked (the whole directory). HTH Gianfranco Il Mercoledì 13 Aprile 2016 22:10, Andreas Tille ha scri

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-14 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > The thing is I used "replace" in the first place instead of embed but > it resulted in > > dh_linktree > dpkg-query: error: --search needs at least one file name pattern argument > > Use --help for help about querying packages. > dh_linktree: error: dpk

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-14 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 10:02:43AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > > The thing is I used "replace" in the first place instead of embed but > > it resulted in > > > > dh_linktree > > dpkg-query: error: --search needs at least one file name pattern argumen

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-14 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Andreas Tille wrote: > You might like to checkout r-cran-shiny[1] or look directly at the > linktrees file[2]. > > > But replace can definitely operate on > > directories even though it will only act on all files below that > > directory. You must have done some mistake in the

Re: How to avoid version restrictions for JS libraries (Was: Bug#820879: r-cran-shiny: uninstallable in sid: Depends: libjs-jquery (< 1.11.3+dfsg.0~) but 1.12.3-1 is to be installed)

2016-04-14 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Raphael, On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:00:26PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > So I did have a look and the problem is that your package doesn't contain any > usr/lib/R/site-library/shiny/www/shared/jqueryui/images to replace > with some real files. > > I added this to check it: > install/$(p

Bug#820938: marked as done (RFS: complexity/1.9+dfsg-1 ITP)

2016-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:51:01 + (UTC) with message-id <1389275674.591962.1460634661443.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820938: RFS: complexity/1.9+dfsg-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #820938, regarding RFS: complexity/1.9+dfsg-1 ITP to be marked as

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-14 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Paul, On 14 April 2016 at 01:17, Paul Wise wrote: > check-all-the-things and lintian print a number of things that could > be polished. What are you seeing on lintian? I hasn't showed anything besides "debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature" (using display-experimental/display-info/pedantic) to me

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-14 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >> check-all-the-things and lintian print a number of things that could >> be polished. > >What are you seeing on lintian? I hasn't showed anything besides apt-get install check-all-the-things -t experimental g.

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Tiago Ilieve wrote: > What are you seeing on lintian? I hasn't showed anything besides > "debian-watch-may-check-gpg-signature" (using > display-experimental/display-info/pedantic) to me. Just that IIRC. I didn't check the binary packages though. -- bye, pabs h

Bug#820940: marked as done (RFS: node-clone/1.0.2-1 [RFP #805907])

2016-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:37:03 + (UTC) with message-id <2088519192.649996.1460637423939.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#820940: RFS: node-clone/1.0.2-1 [RFP #805907] has caused the Debian Bug report #820940, regarding RFS: node-clone/1.0.2-1 [RFP #805907] t

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-14 Thread Tiago Ilieve
Gianfranco, On 14 April 2016 at 09:25, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > apt-get install check-all-the-things -t experimental Thank you. I didn't knew that it was available on experimental only. $ sudo apt install check-all-the-things (...) Need to get 566 MB of archives. After this operation, 2,3

Bug#821004: RFS: s5/1.1.dfsg.2-6 -- fix all the bugs, update the packaging

2016-04-14 Thread Peter Pentchev
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "s5". This is a Debian packaging update that also happens to fix all five of the bugs reported in the BTS. * Package name: s5 Version : 1.1.dfsg.2-6 Upstream Author : Eric Meye

Bug#821004: marked as done (RFS: s5/1.1.dfsg.2-6 -- fix all the bugs, update the packaging)

2016-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:01:21 + (UTC) with message-id <521124994.719635.1460642481651.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#821004: RFS: s5/1.1.dfsg.2-6 -- fix all the bugs, update the packaging has caused the Debian Bug report #821004, regarding RFS: s5/1.1.df

Bug#820900: RFS: [ITP] python-hashids/1.1.0-1

2016-04-14 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Tiago Ilieve wrote: > Thank you. I didn't knew that it was available on experimental only. You can also git clone it and symlink it into your $PATH. The in-development version is usually stable and supports more stuff. > Need to get 566 MB of archives. > After th

Infrastructure Inquiry -- please advise

2016-04-14 Thread Brian M Hamlin
Hi All - I am writing this email, not as a Debian Developer in-training, but instead asking advice from the Debian Project, on behalf of OSGeo.org -- a software foundation modeled on the Apache Foundation, for free and open geospatial software development. OSGeo.org Systems Administration (SAC)

Bug#820544: marked as done (RFS: vifm/0.8.1a-0.1 [NMU] -- flexible vi-like file manager using ncurses)

2016-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 14 Apr 2016 21:01:28 + with message-id <20160414210128.ge14...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#820544: has caused the Debian Bug report #820544, regarding RFS: vifm/0.8.1a-0.1 [NMU] -- flexible vi-like file manager using ncurses to be marked as done. This m

Re: Infrastructure Inquiry -- please advise

2016-04-14 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Hi Brian, This question is not very suitable for the mentors list, this list is intended for help with packaging and other developer-related issues. On 04/14/2016 09:17 PM, Brian M Hamlin wrote: > I am writing this email, not as a Debian Developer in-training, but instead > asking advice from >