Bug#819615: RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool

2016-03-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lee wrote: > N.B. no watchfile is present due to the naming strategy of the upstream > tarball: > uscan interprets the version number as "645" when the release is actually > "6.4.5". > if there's a way to teach uscan how to figure this out, I'm all ears! I t

Bug#819615: RFS: spin/6.4.5-1 [ITP] -- formal software verification tool

2016-03-31 Thread Tom Lee
Great, got it -- thanks Paul. Uploading to mentors again now. On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:59 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lee wrote: > > > N.B. no watchfile is present due to the naming strategy of the upstream > tarball: > > uscan interprets the version number as "

Bug#819646: RFS: kadu/3.0-0.1 [RC]

2016-03-31 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kadu" * Package name: kadu Version : 3.0-0.1 Upstream Author : Kadu Team * URL : http://kadu.im * License : GPL-3+ Section : net It bui

Bug#816542: RFS: connman/1.31-0.1 [RC]

2016-03-31 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
On 03.03.2016 on 12:46, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Mateusz! I am looking for a sponsor for my package "connman" Hi Gianfranco, lets review: 1) * New upstream release (1.31) (Closes: #813580, #813647) #813647 seems not fixed,

Bug#819646: marked as done (RFS: kadu/3.0-0.1 [RC])

2016-03-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2016 14:51:54 +0200 with message-id <56fd1d6a.7090...@linuxmint.pl> and subject line Re: . has caused the Debian Bug report #819646, regarding RFS: kadu/3.0-0.1 [RC] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-03-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, please remove moreinfo when done, and I'll have a look/sponsor the package. thanks for your work! Gianfranco

Bug#816542: RFS: connman/1.31-0.1 [RC]

2016-03-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, so please ping back when you solve the RC bug (point 1) thanks! G. Il Giovedì 31 Marzo 2016 14:57, Mateusz Łukasik ha scritto: On 03.03.2016 on 12:46, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > control: owner -1 ! > control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > Hi Mateusz! > >> I am looking for a sponsor for

Bug#819681: RFS: python-django-gravatar2/1.4.0-1 [ITP]

2016-03-31 Thread Pierre-Elliott Bécue
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-django-gravatar2". * Package name: python-django-gravatar2 Version : 1.4.0-1 Upstream Author : Tristan Waddington * URL : https://github.com/twaddingto

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-03-31 Thread Roderick MacKenzie
Hi Gianfranco, Thanks for your support! I'm currently making my way through the suggestions. I've also got some more suggestions from IRC. I'll post the changes I've made when done. I expect it will take about 2 weeks. I've also moving the build system to autoconf/automake to make it all more

avoid/delayed service reload on upgrade

2016-03-31 Thread Fernando Toledo
Hi all! I packaging mdm[1], a fork from gdm for Huayra[2] (a derivative Debian distribution based on jessie). Our package is based on upstream debian directory with some customized settings[3] to work better with our distro. At this time, MDM work perfect in our system. Now, i focused on get full

Re: avoid/delayed service reload on upgrade

2016-03-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Fernando Toledo wrote: > If i use systemd (not sysvinit) for start the service, i get a kill to > xserver when upgrading the package from one version to another. The gdm3 package in Debian doesn't have this problem, perhaps you can find the solution there? -- bye