Bug#816367: RFS: pidgin-sipe/1.20.1-1 -- Pidgin plugin for MS Office Communicator and MS Lync

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for package "pidgin-sipe", whose source code is at: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/pidgin-sipe.git or you may also: dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pidgin-sipe/pidgin-

hdparm needs a new maintainer

Hello, hdparm is a popular package which has been recently orphaned (see #816168). It provides an udeb so it might be needed/useful in the context of debian-installer too. There are multiple reverse dependencies too. There are 4 RC bugs against it and a new upstream release waiting to be packaged

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

Hi I would like to help. I am an experienced software developer (C/C++) but have no experience in packaging. I don't know if hdparm is hard to package for a newbie mantainer, so If someone can mentor me on that part I would gladly adopt the package. Regards Ivan On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:13 AM,

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

> Hello, > > hdparm is a popular package which has been recently orphaned (see > #816168). It provides an udeb so it might be needed/useful in the context > of debian-installer too. There are multiple reverse dependencies too. > > There are 4 RC bugs against it and a new upstream release waiting to

Bug#813953: marked as done (RFS: popup-el/0.5.3-1 [ITP] -- visual popup user interface library for Emacs)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:53:33 + with message-id <20160301125333.gb27...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#813953: RFS: popup-el/0.5.3-1 [ITP] -- visual popup user interface library for Emacs has caused the Debian Bug report #813953, regarding RFS: popup-el/0.5.3-1 [ITP]

Re: Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

control: reassign -1 sponsorship-requests control: tag -1 moreinfo please DON'T CC debian-mentors (or anybody, for what metters) while filing bugs to sub...@bugs.debian.org. The CCed people will receive an email from you without the bug number, and will be unable to follow-up correctly. In this

Bug#816396: RFS: vizigrep/1.3-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vizigrep" * Package name: vizigrep Version : 1.3-1 Upstream Author : Jason J. Herne * URL : https://github.com/hernejj/vizigrep * License : GPL Section

Bug#815032: marked as done (RFS: hello/3.1-4 ITP)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:38:22 -0500 with message-id and subject line Closing 815032 has caused the Debian Bug report #815032, regarding RFS: hello/3.1-4 ITP to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

Hi For me it is ok, I am just a newbie in packaging. I have received help from a debian mentor Anibal Montalve Salazar < ani...@debian.org>, but I got no references for gbp (yet another Debian packaging toolchain ? ) what is exactly a collab-maint repository, a Git repo for the package host so

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

On 03/01/2016 10:13 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello, > > hdparm is a popular package which has been recently orphaned (see > #816168). It provides an udeb so it might be needed/useful in the context > of debian-installer too. There are multiple reverse dependencies too. > > There are 4 RC bugs

Re: Bug#816363: RFS: fgetty/0.7-0.1 [NMU] -- very small, efficient, console-only getty

[2016-03-01 13:28] Mattia Rizzolo > please DON'T CC debian-mentors (or anybody, for what metters) while > filing bugs to sub...@bugs.debian.org. The CCed people will receive an > email from you without the bug number, and will be unable to follow-up > correctly. In this particular case you also

Bug#816401: RFS: irssi-scripts/20160301

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "irssi-scripts" * Package name: irssi-scripts * Version : 20160301 * URL : http://scripts.irssi.org/ * License : GPL-2.0+ Section :

Re: how to take advantage of uscan for git upstream source with only commits (read no tags) ?

Hello Forum: Thanks for your prompt reply. On 01/03/16 06:51, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> I am on my way to package a software whose the upstream source is >> available at github with only commits: the upstream team uploads >> new material the las

Bug#813900: marked as done (RFS: ripit/4.0.0~beta20140508-1)

Your message dated Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:27:02 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: ripit/4.0.0~beta20140508-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #813900, regarding RFS: ripit/4.0.0~beta20140508-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Re: how to take advantage of uscan for git upstream source with only commits (read no tags) ?

On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 17:04 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > Of course, the version is somewhere in the source: > the issue would be solved if the automates could play with the involved file. pagemangle should be able to take care of that. > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802176

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

Hello, On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > As there are at least 3 persons ( including me :) ) interesting in the > package, I think it will be a good use case for a collab-maint repository. > Further I suggest to use gbp [0] and also switch to debhelper. > > I've played a bit already

Bug#814806: RFS: libauxv/1.1.0-1 [ITP] -- libauxv -- Auxiliary Vector Library library

Hi, On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:48:56 +0100 Frederic Bonnard wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: normal >  > Dear mentors, >  > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libauxv" >  >  Package name: libauxv >  Version : 1.1.0-1 >  Upstream Author : Libauxv team >  URL 

Bug#813952: RFS: helm/1.9.2-1 -- Emacs incremental completion and selection narrowing framework

Hello, On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 07:06:44AM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > By the way, please be sure to check out the pristine-tar branch so that > > you use the same orig.tar as I'm working with :) > > of course. > I have a helm_1.9.2.orig.tar.xz with sha256 > b84e0f59889bf51a5743f85e7e557158b8

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

On 03/01/2016 06:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: >> As there are at least 3 persons ( including me :) ) interesting in the >> package, I think it will be a good use case for a collab-maint repository. >> Further I suggest to use gbp [0] and

Bug#813953: RFS: popup-el/0.5.3-1 [ITP] -- visual popup user interface library for Emacs

Hello, On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:53:33PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > used git, as usual. btw, you missed a '.git' in the url above :) The clone command I specified works without the '.git'! > Please tag the release now. Please stage a bump of Standards-Version > for the next upload. Done

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

Am Dienstag, den 01.03.2016, 19:57 +0100 schrieb Alex Mestiashvili: > On 03/01/2016 06:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > > As there are at least 3 persons ( including me :) ) interesting > > > in the > > > package, I think it will be

Bug#816433: RFS: complexity/1.5+dfsg-1 ITP

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "complexity" * Package name: complexity Version : 1.5+dfsg-1 Upstream Author : Bruce Korb * Url : https://gnu.org/software/complexity * Licenses: GFLD-1.2+

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 01.03.2016, 19:57 +0100 schrieb Alex Mestiashvili: > > On 03/01/2016 06:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > > > > As there are at least 3 persons ( including m

Bug#813933: RFS: sawfish/1:1.11-1 [ITA] -- window manager for X11

On 28/02/16 23:00, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:41:32PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >> In the usual palce there is my lastest interaction. > ok. > > Today I had a look at the symlink_to_dir things closer. > The one for sawfish-lisp-source doesn't seem to work. the file is n

Bug#813933: RFS: sawfish/1:1.11-1 [ITA] -- window manager for X11

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:11:58PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > On 28/02/16 23:00, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:41:32PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > * I just noticed sawfish.preinst removes /var/lib/sawfish that you are > > creating in sawfish.dirs. ??? > > I bel

Re: hdparm needs a new maintainer

Alex Impressive upload. I have already checked out and I am starting to understand how the gpb packager works out. Thx for the links Regards Ivan On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote: > On 03/01/2016 06:11 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On Tue, 01 Mar 2016, A

Re: how to take advantage of uscan for git upstream source with only commits (read no tags) ?

Hello: On 01/03/16 17:50, Paul Wise wrote: > On Tue, 2016-03-01 at 17:04 +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> Of course, the version is somewhere in the source: >> the issue would be solved if the automates could play with the involved file. > > pagemangle should be able to take care of that. > >>

Bug#816433: RFS: complexity/1.5+dfsg-1 ITP

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:59 AM, Dmitry Bogatov wrote: > * New upstream release, which fix issues with non-Unix line endings > (Closes: #816244) > * Standards version bump -- 3.9.7 (No changes needed) Uploaded, thanks for the fix. Some things you might want to get fixed: The file src/cha

Re: how to take advantage of uscan for git upstream source with only commits (read no tags) ?

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > I have just tried to download the source, I get > > Parameter ../6.10.26 does not look like a tar archive or a zip file. at > /usr/bin/mk-origtargz line 375. That happens after the download is done. > Let get more hacky: what must be added

Re: how to take advantage of uscan for git upstream source with only commits (read no tags) ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello Paul: On 02/03/16 04:27, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > >> I have just tried to download the source, I get >> >> Parameter ../6.10.26 does not look like a tar archive or a zip file. at >> /usr/bin/

Packaging fork

Hello! I am interested in packaging [mmh](

Re: Packaging fork

Dmitry Bogatov writes: > I am interested in packaging [mmh]( client, which is fork of nmh. Issue is that they are both provides ~20 > binaries, and renaming them is not option (it is like one day you > discover, that `ls` is now named `new-ls'). If the interfa