Bug#814083: RFS: kwstyle/1.0.1+git3224cf2-1 [ITA]

2016-02-08 Thread Benjamin Eikel
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kwstyle" * Package name: kwstyle Version : 1.0.1+git3224cf2-1 Upstream Author : Kitware, Inc. * URL : https://kitware.github.io/KWStyle/ * License :

Re: Bug#801253: reproducing and fixing lintian errors of wicd 1.7.3-3 package

2016-02-08 Thread toogley
thanks. On 02/07/2016 10:30 PM, gregor herrmann wrote: On Sun, 07 Feb 2016 18:12:36 +0100, Axel Beckert wrote: $ lintian ../wicd-daemon_1.7.3-3_all.deb $ lintian ../wicd-gtk_1.7.3-3_all.deb $ ==> Where is my mistake? On which Debian release have you run lintian? On Debian stable? (I guess s

Re: Bug#781952: RFS:complexity/1.2-1 [ITP] -- tool for analyzing the complexity of C program functions

2016-02-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, done! cheers, G. Il Lunedì 8 Febbraio 2016 7:02, Dmitry Bogatov ha scritto: Hi! Complexity hit testing. Would you be so kind to upload this version (just one more changelog entry) to jessie-backports? Since complexity depends on libopts25, version from testing can't directly be install

Help using `dtach` in override_dh_auto_test (ITP, Bug #808176)

2016-02-08 Thread Víctor Cuadrado Juan
I need help with the python-neovim package, which is almost done (you can see it on alioth[1]). Right now I am stalled, as I can't get the tests to pass when building in a chroot (pbuilder). The tests require a neovim instance running as server, so for example one can use `dtach` to run nvim, and

Bug#814148: RFS: arrayfire/3.3~alpha+dfsg1-1 [experimental]

2016-02-08 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "arrayfire" * Package name: arrayfire Version : 3.3~alpha+dfsg1-1 Upstream Author : ArrayFire Development Group * URL : http://arrayfire.com/ * License : BS

Bug#814148: marked as done (RFS: arrayfire/3.3~alpha+dfsg1-1 [experimental])

2016-02-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:57:13 + (UTC) with message-id <79096815.1992623.1454961433396.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#814148: RFS: arrayfire/3.3~alpha+dfsg1-1 [experimental] has caused the Debian Bug report #814148, regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.3~alpha+dfsg1-

Re: RFS: sponsor needed

2016-02-08 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, please look at http://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers upload the packages on mentors (fix lintian complains), and ask for an RFS bug to have a review. Mail list is not usually a good place to review packages :) cheers, Gianfranco Il Lunedì 25 Gennaio 2016 20:43, pavroo ha scri

Re: Help using `dtach` in override_dh_auto_test (ITP, Bug #808176)

2016-02-08 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Víctor Cuadrado Juan , 2016-02-08, 19:22: dtmp = /build This doesn't sound like a right place to store this socket. /build normally doesn't exist; and in build environments where it does exist, it's not writable by normal users. Please put the sockets somewhere within the package build di

Bug#813933: RFS: sawfish/1:1.11-1 [ITA] -- window manager for X11

2016-02-08 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Today I didn't review all yours remarks. But in the spirit of release early and release often here goes my today effort. On 07/02/16 22:01, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 08:40:10PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >> On 06/02/16 23:41, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >>> Umh, couldn't you t

Bug#813933: RFS: sawfish/1:1.11-1 [ITA] -- window manager for X11

2016-02-08 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:29:55PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > Today I didn't review all yours remarks. But in the spirit of release > early and release often here goes my today effort. yay, I definitely approve this ;) I hadn't gone deeper, just commented on your last changes here. > On 07/

Bug#813933: RFS: sawfish/1:1.11-1 [ITA] -- window manager for X11

2016-02-08 Thread José M Calhariz
On 8 February 2016 21:57:11 GMT+00:00, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:29:55PM +, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >> Today I didn't review all yours remarks. But in the spirit of >release >> early and release often here goes my today effort. > >yay, I definitely approve this ;) >I