On 18 Jan, 2016, at 8:35, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:23:30 AM Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote:
>> On 15 Jan, 2016, at 15:10, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>>> I had a glimpse at the packaging in the source archive 3.0.69 and I think
>>> it needs much more work before it could be uploa
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:23:30 AM Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki wrote:
> On 15 Jan, 2016, at 15:10, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> > I had a glimpse at the packaging in the source archive 3.0.69 and I think
> > it needs much more work before it could be uploaded (let alone my
> > objections against introducing M
Jakub Kruszona-Zawadzki writes:
> On 15 Jan, 2016, at 15:09, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> For quite a while LizardFS is developed with community using public
>> VCS and bug tracker (GitHub) as well as Gerrit code review system and
>> continuous integration system. LizardFS have more development
>> tr
control: owner -1 !
control: tags -1 moreinfo
let's review:
Hi,
1) changelog:
- -- fossfreedom Mon, 28 Dec 2015 19:20:43 +
+ -- David Mohammed Mon, 28 Dec 2015 19:20:43 +
you changed the first changelog entry, not a big problem, but you might want to
change it
back.
- lintian i
Dear mentors,
my package libjreen was uploaded to the NEW queue on 09.Dec 2015. Until
now the package is waiting there. Is this quite normal or is something
wrong with this package?
I'm asking because I want to work on the tomahawk-player package but
without this dependency, I'm unable to continu
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 02:18:11PM +0100, Stefan Ahlers wrote:
> my package libjreen was uploaded to the NEW queue on 09.Dec 2015. Until
> now the package is waiting there. Is this quite normal or is something
> wrong with this package?
It's completely normal.
One month waiting in NEW is totally o
Dear mentors,
after the first review of my draft of the tomahawk-player package, I
discussed the problem with the developers of the player and I commented
all point of the review. Unfortunately, I didn't get any further
response and so I really do not know what to do next.
Because of this circums
Hi,
>after the first review of my draft of the tomahawk-player package, I
>discussed the problem with the developers of the player and I commented
>all point of the review. Unfortunately, I didn't get any further
>response and so I really do not know what to do next.
>
>Because of this circumstanc
hi, I asked on irc #-ftp to review it if possible.
BTW you might even want to rename it as src:jreen in a future upload
(whenever accepted).
(note: the development binary library packages should still be libjreen*)
cheers,
Gianfranco
Il Lunedì 18 Gennaio 2016 14:36, Stefan Ahlers ha
scri
Hi,
> please ping me when the jreen is accepted, I'll go in a new review spin.
Ok, I'll do it.
> please point to the sources, and look if the copyright shows them.
> http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/c/clementine/unstable_copyright
Tomahawk and clementine uses the company lo
I had a look at libretro-mupen64plus (out of curiosity only). I saw that
it bundles a copy of mupen64plus and its modules.
Due to the fact that Mupen64plus can be used as a library and it is
already in Debian I am wondering in how far this copy differs from the
upstream mupen64plus.
Given that emu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I'm looking for a sponsor for a new package:
* Package name: arb
Version : 2.8.1
Upstream Author : Fredrik Johansson
* URL : https://github.com/fredrik-johansson/arb
* License : GPL-2+
Programmi
Hi rondom,
Mupen64Plus for libretro is a fork and is not maintainable by upstream.
The libretro guys changed a lot of things,
so right now it's quite a different emulator with even different
compatibility list. They are incompatible.
Others emulators are upstream friendly, like Nestopia, mGBA
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> control: tag -1 moreinfo
> control: owner -1 !
>
> On Sun, Jan 03, 2016 at 09:26:26PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIÈS wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kbibtex"
>
> sure.
>
>> More information about hello can be obtained from ht
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize"
* Package name: golang-github-kennygrant-sanitize
Version : 1.0-1
Upstream Author : Kenny Grant
* URL : https://github.co
thanks for getting back so fast.
1. changelog. This has been revised with better explanation. I've changed
back the first entry as requested and changed the Maintainer field in
control. I've added an explanation as to why we need python3-gi
2. I've updated the version field for some of the more
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:21:07 +
with message-id <20160119002107.gc15...@chase.mapreri.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#809768: RFS: kbibtex/0.6+git7fdc0cd97c093f-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #809768,
regarding RFS: kbibtex/0.6+git7fdc0cd97c093f-1
to be marked as done.
This me
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: a...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk3-nocsd"
* Package name: gtk3-nocsd
Version : 2-1
Upstream Author : Hong Jen Yee (PCMan)
* URL : https://github.com/PCMan/gt
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jan 2016 06:25:02 +0100
with message-id <1453181102.8196.7.ca...@jff-webhosting.net>
and subject line Debian bug #804432, #768832, #768833. #801312
has caused the Debian Bug report #804432,
regarding RFS: liwc/1.21-2 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qhttpengine"
* Package name: qhttpengine
Version : 0.1.0+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author :Nathan Osman
* URL :https://github.com/nitroshare/qhttpengine
* License
20 matches
Mail list logo
