Re: Request for review: btfs

2016-01-06 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:50:06AM +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > Thanks! I have made those small changes and re-uploaded: lovely! > https://mentors.debian.net/package/btfs > > If you could sponsor it, that would be great thanks! yeah, uploaded :) -- regards, Mattia R

Re: Request for review: btfs

2016-01-06 Thread Jonathan Carter
On 06/01/2016 12:38, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > yeah, uploaded :) Whoohoo! Thanks a lot! -Jonathan

Bug#810090: RFS: eclib -- code for modular symbols and elliptic curves over Q

2016-01-06 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "eclib" * Package name: eclib Version : 20160101 Upstream Author : John Cremona * URL : https://github.com/JohnCremona/eclib * License : GPL-2+

Bug#809985: marked as done (RFS: rubiks/20070912-2 -- a collection of Rubik's cube solvers)

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:05:49 + (UTC) with message-id <54380875.1244694.1452081949970.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#809985: RFS: rubiks -- a collection of Rubik's cube solvers has caused the Debian Bug report #809985, regarding RFS: rubiks/20070912-2 --

Bug#810008: marked as done (RFS: arrayfire/3.2.2+dfsg1-1 [RC])

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:15:00 + (UTC) with message-id <2096077512.1314713.1452082500250.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#810008: RFS: arrayfire/3.2.2+dfsg1-1 [RC] has caused the Debian Bug report #810008, regarding RFS: arrayfire/3.2.2+dfsg1-1 [RC] to be mar

Bug#810094: RFS: sagemath-database-combinatorial-designs -- Databases of combinatorial designs

2016-01-06 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sagemath-database-combinatorial-designs" * Package name: sagemath-database-combinatorial-designs Version : 20140630 Upstream Author : Nathann Cohen * URL

Bug#810094: marked as done (RFS: sagemath-database-combinatorial-designs -- Databases of combinatorial designs)

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:52:38 + (UTC) with message-id <1621000724.1341083.1452084758455.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#810094: RFS: sagemath-database-combinatorial-designs -- Databases of combinatorial designs has caused the Debian Bug report #810094, reg

Bug#810090: RFS: eclib -- code for modular symbols and elliptic curves over Q

2016-01-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, Signed&Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian! >I don't think that update will require a transition. reverse-depends -b libec-dev reverse-depends libec-dev reverse-depends libec2 returned nothing, so I sponsored the package. there is no need for a Debian transition, but it m

Bug#810090: marked as done (RFS: eclib -- code for modular symbols and elliptic curves over Q)

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 6 Jan 2016 13:03:28 + (UTC) with message-id <1827948725.1292711.1452085408238.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#810090: Info received (Bug#810090: RFS: eclib -- code for modular symbols and elliptic curves over Q) has caused the Debian Bug report #

Help needed with symbols index in package

2016-01-06 Thread Jonathan Carter
Hi Debian Mentors I'm attempting to package kpmcore, a shared library for partitioning tasks in KDE. I'm not sure if my dpkg symbols index for the shared library file gets used because it doesn't contain a debian revision, yet lintian says that it does on my binary package (inspecting the binary p

Bug#810101: RFS: sagemath-database-conway-polynomials -- Database of Conway polynomials

2016-01-06 Thread Julien Puydt
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "sagemath-database-conway-polynomials" * Package name: sagemath-database-conway-polynomials Version : 0.4.p0+dfsg-2 Upstream Author : R. Andrew Ohana * URL

Bug#810101: marked as done (RFS: sagemath-database-conway-polynomials -- Database of Conway polynomials)

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:25:42 + (UTC) with message-id <1194373717.1411067.1452090342957.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com> and subject line Re: Bug#810101: RFS: sagemath-database-conway-polynomials -- Database of Conway polynomials has caused the Debian Bug report #810101, regarding

Bug#808613: RFS: re2c/0.15.3-1 [ITA] -- tool for generating fast C-based recognizers

2016-01-06 Thread JCF Ploemen
Adam Borowski : > > Package name: re2c > > Alas, the new version failed to build on five architectures. Even > worse, the build logs contain no meaningful output: > [...] > Could you please create an "override_dh_auto_test" target in > debian/rules that runs "$(MAKE) check" and if it fai

Bug#810107: RFS: node-getobject/0.1.0-1 [ITP]

2016-01-06 Thread Jonathan Ulrich Horn
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-getobject" * Package name: node-getobject Version : 0.1.0-1 Upstream Author : "Cowboy" Ben Alman * URL : https://github.com/cowboy/node-getobject * Licen

Re: Failed to stop defining RPATH in libncl

2016-01-06 Thread Vincent Danjean
Le 05/01/2016 16:21, Andreas Tille a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 05:19:42PM +, Wookey wrote: >> +++ Andreas Tille [2016-01-04 16:19 +0100]: >>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:07:40PM +, Wookey wrote: > E: ncl-tools: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath usr/bin/NCLconverter > /usr/lib/x8

Bug#809272: marked as done (RFS: pygithub/1.26.0-1)

2016-01-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:21:48 + with message-id <20160106162148.ga8...@chase.mapreri.org> and subject line Re: Bug#809272: RFS: pygithub/1.26.0-1 ITP has caused the Debian Bug report #809272, regarding RFS: pygithub/1.26.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Re: Help needed with symbols index in package

2016-01-06 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Jonathan Carter , 2016-01-06, 15:13: I'm attempting to package kpmcore, a shared library for partitioning tasks in KDE. I'm not sure if my dpkg symbols index for the shared library file gets used because it doesn't contain a debian revision, yet lintian says that it does on my binary package

Re: Help needed with symbols index in package

2016-01-06 Thread Eriberto Mota
Hi Jonathan, Initially, your package doesn't build in a fresh jail because needs extra-cmake-modules, libkf5kdelibs4support-dev and pkg-config in Build-Depends field. Please, always use cowbuilder or pbuilder to test if your package builds. About the symbols, the problem is that dpkg-gensymbols i

Re: Help needed with symbols index in package

2016-01-06 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Hi Eriberto On 07/01/2016 01:28, Eriberto Mota wrote: Other datail is that is a good idea upload the first version to experimental to see how to the library will build. So you will able to can fix the issues (if necessary) and reupload to unstable. I hope this help. Yes thanks that's very val

Re: Help needed with symbols index in package

2016-01-06 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Eriberto Mota , 2016-01-06, 21:28: dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libkpmcore1/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libkpmcore1.symbols --- debian/libkpmcore1.symbols (libkpmcore1_1.9.50-1_amd64) +++ dpkg-gensymbolsBiEPCo 2016-01-06 20:58:15.171645367 -0200 @@ -1195,3 +1195,23

Re: Help needed with symbols index in package

2016-01-06 Thread Eriberto
Hi Jakub, 2016-01-06 22:11 GMT-02:00 Jakub Wilk : > There's a simple work-around: pass -X (with appropriate argument) to > dh_makeshlibs. > >> export PVER=$(shell dpkg-parsechangelog --show-field version | cut -d"-" >> -f1) >> >> %: >> dh $@ >> >> override_dh_makeshlibs: >> dh_mak

Bug#806572: RFS: multimail/0.50~20150922-1 [ITA]

2016-01-06 Thread Robert James Clay
On Tuesday, January 05, 2016 04:27:48 AM Tobias Frost wrote: > > Am Montag, den 04.01.2016, 21:29 -0500 schrieb Robert James Clay: > > Some small review. As a result of the review of my multimail package by Tobias, I have completed some updates to the package and have uploaded the new versi