Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear Mentors:
I am looking for a sponsor for the package gap-guava that
I am maintining on behalf of the Debian Science Team.
This pacakge fix a reproduciblefix, introduce a debug
package, and fixes some new (so to spe
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I prepared a package for mdadm containing a patch to fix bug #784070
(https://bugs.debian.org/784070) which prevents booting a software RAID
1 in degraded mode. I'm looking for a sponsor to upload it to jessie-
proposed-updates.
I've
Hi Jerome,
Am Montag, den 28.12.2015, 09:13 +0100 schrieb Jerome Benoit:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Mentors:
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package gap-guava that
> I am maintining on behalf of the Debian Science Team.
> This pacakge fix
Hi Yann, I see the previous upload has been sponsored by Steve
[2015-11-23] Accepted mdadm 3.3.4-1.1 (source amd64) into unstable (Yann
Soubeyrand) (signed by: Steve McIntyre)
Can't you just ask him to sponsor again to jessie s-p-u?
I have no problem in sponsoring something to s-p-u, but I'm n
Please go ahead. Shamefully, I have never done an s-p-u upload to
date! =) So it would take me a while to figure out how the changelog
entry should look like, what the suite and upload target are etc.
Regards,
Dimitri.
On 28 December 2015 at 11:54, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Hi Yann, I see
Your message dated Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:04:00 + (UTC)
with message-id <1801604845.6473866.1451315040908.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#809210: RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU]
has caused the Debian Bug report #809210,
regarding RFS: mdadm/3.3.2-5+deb8u1 [NMU]
to be marked
Thank you for the upload!
Cheers
Yann
On Monday, December 28 2015, Ben Finney wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the reply.
> Sergio Durigan Junior writes:
>
>> After reading the policy and having a brief chat with Paul Tagliamonte
>> on #debian-devel, the apparent solution would be to rename the source
>> tarball. Today, it is named "mido
Hi,
also the - is a good separator.
you can use
dpkg --compare-versions
to see if the version is good or not.
cheers,
G.
Il Lunedì 28 Dicembre 2015 17:05, Sergio Durigan Junior
ha scritto:
On Monday, December 28 2015, Ben Finney wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thanks for the reply.
> Sergio Durigan Ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Tobias:
On 28/12/15 11:54, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> Am Montag, den 28.12.2015, 09:13 +0100 schrieb Jerome Benoit:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear Mentors:
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Again:
On 28/12/15 18:00, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Tobias:
>
> On 28/12/15 11:54, Tobias Frost wrote:
>> Hi Jerome,
>
>> Am Montag, den 28.12.2015, 09:13 +0100 schrieb Jerome Benoit:
>>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>>> Severity: normal
>>
Hi all,
sorry for bothering you again but there are people who are interested in
a new debian package of ASDF 3.1.6 and I would like to at least have
some feedback on its packaging.
Can some kind soul please upload the package if it is acceptable or let
me know what to change?
Thank you
Kambiz
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 06:29:03PM +0100, Kambiz Darabi wrote:
> sorry for bothering you again but there are people who are interested in
> a new debian package of ASDF 3.1.6
You didn't file a RFS.
Me and other "random sponors you find in -mentors" checks
https://bugs.debian.org/sponsorship-reques
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I realized this part of the story at finalizing stage when I was testing
> my material with pbuilder (Sid): lintian emmitted a lot of warnings about
> this automatic package: I have fixed them (and other related stuff) by
> introducin
Hello Nicholas,
> I believe the package also needs Build-Depends on libpython-all-dev and
> libpython3-all-dev, or the C extensions fail (nonfatally) to compile in a
> clean
> chroot environment.
thanks for the hint - the Build-Depends are indeed needed for successfully
building the C extensions
Hey all,
I'm willing to sponsor this package and any related packages.
Paul
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Diego M. Rodriguez
wrote:
> Hello Nicholas,
>
> > I believe the package also needs Build-Depends on libpython-all-dev and
> > libpython3-all-dev, or the C extensions fail (nonfatally)
Hi
>I'm trying to get rid of the last pedantic linitian issue which is the signing
>of the release.
>
> I think I've figured out how to sign the .tar.gz on github
>
>gpg --default-key 7B0393D9 --armor --detach-sign
>alternative-toolbar-0.15.tar.gz
wonderful!
>Then I attached the .asc file
Hi, the package was already in new queue, and got accepted yesterday.
Please move your fixes in a -2 revision and ping me when done.
and please start from the -1 version in experimental
e.g.
with
dget -u
http://http.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/webcamoid/webcamoid_6.2.0-1.dsc
thanks
Gian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi:
On 28/12/15 19:05, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 06:00:46PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> I realized this part of the story at finalizing stage when I was testing
>> my material with pbuilder (Sid): lintian emmitted a lot of w
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 08:23:39PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I play with the bpo version on my every day box,
> but, since debhelp is the Jessie version, no extra/hidden -dbgsym
> is generated.
You should build your package in a chroot of the target distribution,
always (in this case, you need
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 07:35:13PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 08:23:39PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > I play with the bpo version on my every day box,
> > but, since debhelp is the Jessie version, no extra/hidden -dbgsym
> > is generated.
>
> You should build your pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/12/15 20:35, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 08:23:39PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> I play with the bpo version on my every day box,
>> but, since debhelp is the Jessie version, no extra/hidden -dbgsym
>> is generated.
>
>
Gianfranco,
I've uploaded an updated package with your suggested watch file.
According to the uscan results I got the following - I presume this means
success?
uscan debug: matching pattern(s) (?:(?:https://github.com
)?\/fossfreedom\/alternative\-toolbar\/tags)?.*/v?(\d\S*)\.tar\.gz
-- Found
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi:
On 28/12/15 20:44, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 07:35:13PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 08:23:39PM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>> I play with the bpo version on my every day box,
>>> but, since debhe
Sergio Durigan Junior writes:
> On Monday, December 28 2015, Ben Finney wrote:
> > If you want a suffix indicating “later than 0.5.11”, a conventional
> > separator to use is “+”. So, “0.5.11+ds1”.
>
> I was afraid you were going to say that...
>
> My first attempt was to use '+ds1' instead of '~
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Again:
On 28/12/15 11:54, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> Am Montag, den 28.12.2015, 09:13 +0100 schrieb Jerome Benoit:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear Mentors:
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the p
Hi,
uscan warning: In directory ., downloading
https://github.com/fossfreedom/alternative-toolbar/archive/v0.15.0.tar.gz.asc
failed: 404 Not Found
seems that you have to rename it (or tweak the regex)
BTW remove license . patch seems difficult to maintain, what about dropping the
two patche
Hi Gianfranco,
strange that my uscan didnt pick that up.
I've renamed the .asc file on the tag to v0.15.0.tar.gz.asc
With regards to the license issue.
I have to include the LICENSE part of Makefile.am so that those people who
compile directly from source correctly has the LICENSE file added
ok - scratch that Gianfranco,
I deleted the rhythmbox-plugin-alternative-toolbar_0.15.0.orig.tar.gz file
and reran uscan --debug --force-download
It came back with the same 404 error
GitHub saves attached downloads to the releases/download/v0.15.0 folder not
to the archive folder
https://github
Your message dated Tue, 29 Dec 2015 03:43:50 +0100
with message-id <20151229024350.ga...@angband.pl>
and subject line uploaded
has caused the Debian Bug report #808613,
regarding RFS: re2c/0.15.3-1 [ITA] -- tool for generating fast C-based
recognizers
to be marked as done.
This means that you cla
Hello,
is it possible to have uscan check multiple hosts? e.g.
for GNU findutils I would like to look at both stable and unstable
releases i.e. combining these two watchfiles:
version=3
opts=pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/ \
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/findutils/findutils-([\d\.\d]+)\.tar\.(?:gz|bz2|xz)
v
Andreas Metzler writes:
> is it possible to have uscan check multiple hosts? e.g. for GNU
> findutils I would like to look at both stable and unstable releases
Are you aware the watch file is meant to find a *single* tarball?
What would you want the result of scanning multiple hosts; how would
32 matches
Mail list logo
