Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package:
* Package name:pickleshare
Version: 0.5
Upstream author: Ville Vainio
* URL: https://github.com/pickleshare/pickleshare
* License: Expat
Progr. lang.:Python
Control: owner -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi, the packaging looks good to me, hovewer a typo in packaging is preventing
python3-path from
being added to the python3 package runtime dependencies.
I guess replacing
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${python:Depends}
to
Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${pyt
Dear list,
This is my first contact with the Debian community. I might be doing all
sorts of errors, including sending a questionable message to the wrong
list. Just tell me, I'll listen.
I'm the upstream LIRC [2] maintainer. We are currently in the 0.9.4
cycle which tentatively will be released
El Divendres, 30 d'octubre de 2015, a les 09:34:09, Alec Leamas va escriure:
> Dear list,
>
> This is my first contact with the Debian community. I might be doing all
> sorts of errors, including sending a questionable message to the wrong
> list. Just tell me, I'll listen.
>
> I'm the upstream L
Hi Alec,
(can't answer for the maintainers, just giving my personal pinion)
>This is my first contact with the Debian community. I might be doing all
>sorts of errors, including sending a questionable message to the wrong
>list. Just tell me, I'll listen.
it is fine by me
>I'm the upstream LI
Hi Tim,
>Hmm, I'm not really sure what you mean with that, but alright.
well, I started packaging in 2013 and I didn't provide good packages on the
first tries.
(actually I'm still doing packaging mistakes)
You seem to be a better packager than me, and you told you are on your first
packagin
wonderful,
and BTW don't forget to subscribe to the package
(in the pts page on the bottom there is a subscribe by mail box)
this way you will be notified on bugs, and prevent the package from
disappearing again.
(well, first you need to make it enter unstable again :p)
cheers,
G.
Il Vener
On 30/10/15 09:51, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> El Divendres, 30 d'octubre de 2015, a les 09:34:09, Alec Leamas va escriure:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I'm the upstream LIRC [2] maintainer. We are currently in the 0.9.4
>> cycle which tentatively will be released around Christmas. The debian
>> off
On 30/10/15 09:51, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Alec,
>
>>
>> I'm not seeking any argument as to why the Debian packages are still
>> 0.9.0. It's the debian packager's decision. Full stop.
>
>
> the argument might be: we were in the freeze because of jessie release at
> that time,
> so no
BTW if you really think as upstream that the package is in a bad state, and the
maintainer are not answering to mails
please contact MIA team
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MIA
and based on the issues on the current version (e.g. does the current debian
version has serious/security bugs?)
you ca
and please note: there is currently an RC bug open against the package.
you might want to help fixing that bug as a start.
cheers,
G
Il Venerdì 30 Ottobre 2015 12:14, Gianfranco Costamagna
ha scritto:
BTW if you really think as upstream that the package is in a bad state, and the
maintain
Just my 2 cents here but quoting d-mentors FAQ [1]:
"There are cases where upstream ships a tarball which already contains a
debian directory. This is undesirable, even if you're upstream yourself
or can commit there. Keep the released tarballs (used as .orig.tar.gz)
and the debian directory s
Great to see activity going and please pardon me staying silent on this
issue ;)
Cheers everyone!
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenko
Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834
Your message dated Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:17:30 + (UTC)
with message-id <148785.8189966.1446218250936.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#803437: RFS: pickleshare -- File system based database
that uses Python pickles
has caused the Debian Bug report #803437,
regarding RFS
On 30/10/15 12:45, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> Just my 2 cents here but quoting d-mentors FAQ [1]:
>
> "There are cases where upstream ships a tarball which already contains a
> debian directory. This is undesirable, even if you're upstream yourself
> or can commit there. Keep the released tarballs
On 30/10/15 15:29, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 30/10/15 12:45, Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
Just my 2 cents here but quoting d-mentors FAQ [1]:
"There are cases where upstream ships a tarball which already contains a
debian directory. This is undesirable, even if you're upstream yourself
or can commit
16 matches
Mail list logo
