Hi Vincent,
[I am merging the e-mails you send yesterday to make the thread easier
again.]
On 20-08-15 18:12, Vincent Blut wrote:
> Le jeu. 20 août 2015 à 12:10, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> On 19-08-15 21:29, Vincent Blut wrote:
>> Please add the CVE numbers that were fixed by upstream to your chan
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "node-os-tmpdir"
* Package name: node-os-tmpdir
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/os-tmpdir
* License
Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2015 08:02:50 + (UTC)
with message-id <669933142.8662468.1440144170933.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#796296: RFS: node-os-tmpdir/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #796296,
regarding RFS: node-os-tmpdir/1.0.1-1 [ITP]
to be mar
Hello guys,
Sorry but yestarday I was in the Debconf dinner. Right now I am at
#debian-opensips in irc.debian.org
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Debian Developer
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' : Free Operating Systems
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- GPG Fingerprint:
C2C8 904E 3
Hi,
thanks for the answers. They helped me to achieve progress.
So i really had to pass the can-he-install-sid-? test.
I already began installing yesterday evening.
It is instructive, but i would have preferred to postpone
the qemu adventures until i explore passthrough of DVD drives.
How abou
On 20/08/15 18:33, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>
> - https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#How_do_I_make_my_first_package.3F
> "Put a package together, built against a current version of sid."
>
> I'm on Jessie 8.1. The dependencies of the packages in question
> are very basic. The package sou
Hello Bas:
On 20/08/15 09:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 20-08-15 00:51, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> I keep getting the error message:
>>
>> Error: Unable to check the signature or the signature was invalid:
>> ==> : UDFormatError: Signing key
>> (80BFC3820C4B26E3, Jerome) has expired
>>
>> Bu
On 21/08/15 13:21, Danny Edel wrote:
> Once sbuild is setup
Just to clarify. In this use case (using sbuild as close to buildd as
possible), the steps labeled "for personal use" in
https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild#Configuration
are *not* what we want.
The Source package will be created by debuild -
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Daniel,
I do not remember how we left this one, anyway:
now with the llvm stuff being fixed/rebuilt, I asked for a give back of
afl, and it is actually building almost everywhere
(just arm64 needs investigation, and s390x/kfreebsd-amd64 needs an
llvm-toolchain-3.6 r
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Hi mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mlucas",
I have uploaded a new version of the package to fix issues pointed out
by Jakub Wilk,
please see previous message in the bug report to see what issues are fixed
I will now elaborate
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Bug#792447: RFS: python-afl/0.2.1-1 -- American Fuzzy Lop fuzzy
testing for Python code [ITP]
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 14:25:34 +0200
From: Daniel Stender
To: Gianfranco Costamagna
On 21.08.2015 14:19, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Control: tags
Hi Alex,
let's review :)
d/changelog please set to unstable, and update the timestamp
d/rules: wl-asneeded is good if enable, does it introduce some problems?
are both autotools-dev and autoreconf needed?
usually the latter should superceed the former
d/rules: I personally do not like calling "bo
Hi,
Danny Edel wrote:
> Debian actually has ready-made VM scripts for you.
> https://wiki.debian.org/sbuild
They urgently need advertising at the entry points
of mentors.debian.net and at the upload instructions.
> call "debuild -S" on your host machine first:
> This will create a .debian.tar.
Hi Gianfranco,
Thanks for the quick reply, I have just finished dinner.
2015-08-21 20:46 GMT+08:00, Gianfranco Costamagna
:
> Hi Alex,
> let's review :)
>
> d/changelog please set to unstable, and update the timestamp
Okay.
> d/rules: wl-asneeded is good if enable, does it introduce some problem
On 21/08/15 15:42, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Well, i need to make some progress with uploading.
> So i'll go on with the VM for now. I need to learn a bit more
> about what sbuild does. On the long run it looks cleaner.
Hi Thomas,
sbuild basically implements what you have started to build in your V
Hi
>Okay. I think this needs further explaination. Upstream does not
>include a build system, not even a Makefile. Building is done by
>invoking gcc directly using different flags for different platform.
>This is however cumbersome, so I add autotools to ease building. I use
>git for development
Hi Gianfranco,
2015-08-21 22:15 GMT+08:00, Gianfranco Costamagna
:
> so basically the tarball found with uscan has nothing in common with the
> actual
> Debian packaging?
>
>
> you grab the tarball, you add a build system and you pack again, right?
>
Actually no. I think this needs clarification.
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the package paflib I just uploaded
(ITP - #781117) http://bugs.debian.org/781117 paflib
debuild passes ok, but lintian -EviIL +pedantic gives the following
messages: Do I have to sort them out ?
lintian -EviIL +pedantic | grep -v ^N:
W: paflib sour
Hi,
>Actually no. I think this needs clarification. The upstream tarball
>contains .c .h files and some (non-dfsg-compliant) temporary files.
>The repack script removes the (non-dfsg-compliant) temporary files and
>move all the .c .h files into a directory called src/. The build
>system and frien
On 2015-08-21 13:21, Danny Edel wrote:
> On 20/08/15 18:33, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
>> Else: Is there a shortcut description how to quickly set up
>> Debian package development in a virtual machine and how
>> to keep it up to date ?
>> (Hardware is plenty but my own VM scripts date back to De
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:37 PM, tfauck wrote:
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package paflib I just uploaded
> (ITP - #781117) http://bugs.debian.org/781117 paflib
>
> debuild passes ok, but lintian -EviIL +pedantic gives the following messages:
> Do I have to sort them
Hi,
>W: paflib source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
if you are nmuing it you need to mention the Non-maintainer upload
in changelog.
dch --nmu (or similar) does it for you
>W: paflib source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 0.2.0-1
same here, 0.2.0-1 is not an NMU number, 0.2.0-1.1 is
On 2015-08-21 13:15, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> I already began installing yesterday evening.
> It is instructive, but i would have preferred to postpone
> the qemu adventures until i explore passthrough of DVD drives.
Yes, that makes sense.
> How about publicly available accounts on a sid machine,
Hi,
Danny Edel wrote:
> The main advantage of [sbuild] is the "...and throw everything away to get a
> clean starting point", so you have a reproducible and minimal build
> environment.
Yep. Cleaner and thus more sensible to changes in environment.
As said, i deem the source very portable and th
On 2015-08-21 17:21, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:37 PM, tfauck wrote:
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the package paflib I just uploaded
>> (ITP - #781117) http://bugs.debian.org/781117 paflib
>>
>> debuild passes ok, but lintian -EviIL +pedantic g
Ok, I've tested on a clean jessie install and the systemd script works
as expected. I also made sure this package will build properly against
sid.
The python-3to2 packages does not appear to exist in jessie, only
stretch and sid. 3to2 is not installed by the python package in sid,
only with the py
Hi,
>Ok, I've tested on a clean jessie install and the systemd script works
>as expected. I also made sure this package will build properly against
>sid.
wonderful
>The python-3to2 packages does not appear to exist in jessie, only
>stretch and sid. 3to2 is not installed by the python package in
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rolldice"
* Package name: rolldice
Version : 1.14-1
Upstream Author : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : [fill in URL of upstreams web site]
* License
Whoops, forgot to fill in some details:
Upstream Author : Stevie Strickland
* URL : https://github.com/sstrickl/rolldice
* License : GPL-2
On 21/08/15 01:47 PM, Thomas Ross wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a
I have updated the watch file. The new version is on mentors.
Regards,
Thomas.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Gianfranco,
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 at 07:23:55 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> I didn't follow the thread, and seems that other DDs are already caring of
> this one, so I would just put my .02$ (and let me know if you need a review
> or help).
Thanks! So far only Helmut has given feedback
I have updated the copyright file to conform to dep5. The new version is
on mentors.
Regards,
Thomas.
Hi Stephen,
I've had a last look at the source code of the package, and,
unfortunately I found something quite annoying: there are lot of
external snippets and external libs in the vendors folder. Debian's way
of thinking packaging isn't in accordance to it. We should package
every piece of code
Hugo,
I think that makes sense. I will get the dependencies packaged and
follow up with the go packaging team. Thanks so much for your time
spent on this!
Stephen
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> I've had a last look at the source code of the package, an
Oops, it looks like I missed the format header in the copyright file.
Unfortunately I will not be able to fix this until Sunday.
Regards,
Thomas
On Friday, 21 August 2015, Thomas Ross wrote:
> I have updated the copyright file to conform to dep5. The new version is
> on mentors.
>
> Regards,
>
Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2015 21:20:34 + (UTC)
with message-id <590873325.376112.1440192034567.javamail.ya...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#796395: RFS: rolldice/1.14-1 ITA
has caused the Debian Bug report #796395,
regarding RFS: rolldice/1.14-1 ITA
to be marked as done.
This
Hi,
after some fight with the keyring i am able to produce
signed packages on sid.
Will this warning be a problem ?
$ gpg --verify ../libisoburn_1.4.0-1.1_source.changes
gpg: Signature made Fri 21 Aug 2015 10:44:01 PM CEST using DSA key ID ABC0A854
gpg: Good signature from "Thomas Schmitt
Hi
Did you mean to close the bug?
About the dep5 copyright issue, yes, I accidentally left out the header.
I will fix the use-flag patch as you described.
About the man page, the reason I didn't have it be installed by dh_manpages
is the man page is edited in the Makefile, adding the version nu
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after some fight with the keyring i am able to produce
> signed packages on sid.
>
> Will this warning be a problem ?
>
> $ gpg --verify ../libisoburn_1.4.0-1.1_source.changes
> gpg: Signature made Fri 21 Aug 2015 10:44:01 PM CE
>Did you mean to close the bug?
nope, sorry
>About the dep5 copyright issue, yes, I accidentally left out the header.
no problem
>I will fix the use-flag patch as you described.
ok
(this shouldn't change anything, since LDFLAGS in this case are the Debian
flags,
and for sure they do not add
40 matches
Mail list logo
