On 07/01/2015 07:24 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:02:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote:
>> Version : 0.12.0-1
> I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject.
Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and we thought it was simpl
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote:
> >> Version : 0.12.0-1
> > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject.
> Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jcristau) and we thought it was simpler
> to
> keep the same version, since I've m
❦ 1 juillet 2015 12:52 +0200, Jakub Wilk :
>>So, should I:
>>
>>* Not remove the user on purge (as I have seen done in other packages)
>
> There seem to be consensus that system users should not be
> removed. Please see bug #621833 for details.
The thread is mostly dead and it seems that at so
Hi,
I can not find the changes for the release in question in Git.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debi
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 15:11:34 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote:
> > >> Version : 0.12.0-1
> > > I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team
> > > reject.
> > Yes, but i've discussed this Julien (jc
On 02/07/15 13:24, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I can not find the changes for the release in question in Git.
Kind regards
Andreas.
Done. Pushed both branch and release tag.
Ghis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #790797,
regarding RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:22 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #790793,
regarding RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:20 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: autoconf-archive/20150224-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790300,
regarding RFS: autoconf-archive/20150224-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 16:27:21 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: linop/0.8.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #790785,
regarding RFS: linop/0.8.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "h5py"
* Package name: h5py
Version : 2.5.0-1
Upstream Author : Andrew Colette
* URL : http://www.h5py.org/
* License : BSD
Section : python
It buil
Hi Tony,
Sorry, just saw your roxterm RFS and realized that I actually never
got back to you with your latest set of questions.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> That won't cause problems due to the reversed dependencies? One disadvantage
> I can foresee is that this will
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: owner -1 !
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tony Houghton wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm"
>
> * Package name: roxterm
>Version : 3.0.1-
uploaded
Fred
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/a2a20ec3b8560d408356cac2fc148e53b2172...@sun-dag3.synchrotron-soleil.fr
Your message dated Thu, 2 Jul 2015 20:27:40 +
with message-id
and subject line RE:Bug#790895: RFS: h5py/2.5.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #790895,
regarding RFS: h5py/2.5.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi,
again I have no idea how to fix this issue and need to ask some c++ experts.
Thanks for any help
Andreas.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:32:46AM +, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: src:jellyfish
> Version: 2.1.4-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: sid stretch
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.
16 matches
Mail list logo
