Re: Bug#778007: mira: ftbfs with GCC-5

2015-07-01 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, I tried to track down this problem but picked the latest upstream version to see whether something regarding gcc-5 was done. In fact the reported problem vanished and was replaced by a new one which I also can't solve. Any help to track down the problem (see attachment) for the packaging in

Bug#790726: RFS: stx-btree/0.9-2

2015-07-01 Thread Yury Stankevich
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "stx-btree" * Package name: stx-btree Version : 0.9-2 Upstream Author : Timo Bingmann (Mail: tb a-with-circle idlebox dot net) * URL : http://idlebox.net/2007/stx-bt

Re: How or if daemon users should be removed

2015-07-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Cameron Norman , 2015-06-30, 14:07: I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its daemon with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are not guaranteed to be installed at the time of post

Re: Bug#778007: mira: ftbfs with GCC-5

2015-07-01 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Andreas Tille , 2015-07-01, 09:32: ../mira/libmira.a(assembly_io.o): In function `boost::re_detail::perl_matcher<__gnu_cxx::__normal_iterator, std::allocator > >, std::allocator, std::allocator > > > >, boost::regex_traits > >::match_prefix()': My guess it that the only fix needed here is t

Re: How or if daemon users should be removed

2015-07-01 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:07:29PM -0700, Cameron Norman wrote: > I have a package (apt-p2p) that I want to adopt that removes its > daemon with deluser in postrm (on purge). This causes issues (piuparts > complains) because deluser is not essential and dependent packages are > not guaranteed to be

Bug#790761: RFS: mysql-sandbox/3.0.50-1 ITP #554155

2015-07-01 Thread Mateusz Kijowski
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mysql-sandbox" Package name: mysql-sandbox Version : 3.0.50-1 Upstream Author : Giuseppe Maxia URL : http://mysqlsandbox.net/ License : GPL-2.0+ Section

Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL BLAS library

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "clblas" * Package name: clblas Version : 2.4-2 Upstream Author : Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. * URL : https://github.com/clMathLibraries/clBLAS * License

Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL BLAS library

2015-07-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello Ghislain, please upload to mentors then I will upload :) wrong url in the next message ;) De : Ghislain Vaillant [ghisv...@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 1 juillet 2015 18:09 À : sub...@bugs.debian.org Objet : Bug#790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-2 -- OpenCL B

Bug#777586: marked as done (RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP])

2015-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:24:42 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP] has caused the Debian Bug report #777586, regarding RFS: crosswalk/11.40.277.2-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#790771: marked as done (RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library)

2015-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 16:24:41 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library has caused the Debian Bug report #790771, regarding RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#790771: why closed ?

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 01/07/15 17:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report which was filed against the sponsorship-requests package: #790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library It has been closed by Bart Martens . Their explanation is attached below

Bug#790771: why closed ?

2015-07-01 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. Cheers Fred > #790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Bug#790771: why closed ?

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
On 01/07/15 17:51, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. Cheers Fred #790771: RFS: clblas/2.4-1 -- OpenCL BLAS library Sure, because: *Changed Bug title to 'RFS: clblas/2.4-1 --

Bug#790771: Uploaded to mentors

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi Fred, clblas/2.4-2 is now available on mentors. It includes the reproducibility fix submitted by Maria and the improvement you suggested in the previous RFS. Thanks for your sponsorship. Ghis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscr

Bug#790771: why closed ?

2015-07-01 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Please, avoid sending email in HTML. > On 01/07/15 17:51, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > >look at the title ;) > >RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) > > > >no worry upload to mentors en I will take care of the sponsoring. > > > >Cheer

Bug#790412: RFS: circus/0.12.0-1

2015-07-01 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:02:59AM +0200, David Douard wrote: > Version : 0.12.0-1 I think the common practice is to bump the version after a ftp-team reject. > * remove buildout related files from the source package As your orig tarball differs from the upstream repo (and the repo found

Bug#790771: why closed ?

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Hi Mattia On 01/07/15 18:21, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: Please, avoid sending email in HTML. My bad. On 01/07/15 17:51, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: look at the title ;) RFS for the 2.4-1 version :) no worry upload to mentor

Bug#790391: marked as done (RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA)

2015-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 01 Jul 2015 19:45:34 +0200 with message-id <5594273e.1060...@spiessknafl.at> and subject line Re: Bug#790391: RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA has caused the Debian Bug report #790391, regarding RFS: bomberclone/0.11.9-5 ITA to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#790785: RFS: linop/0.8.2-3

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "linop" * Package name: linop Version : 0.8.2-3 Upstream Author : Ghislain Vaillant * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/linop * License : BSD Section

Bug#790793: RFS: python-bitstring/3.1.3-2

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-bitstring" * Package name: python-bitstring Version : 3.1.3-2 Upstream Author : Scott Griffiths * URL : http://scott-griffiths.github.io/bitstring/ * License

Bug#790791: RFS: ismrmrd/1.2.3-1

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ismrmrd" * Package name: ismrmrd Version : 1.2.3-1 Upstream Author : The ISMRMRD developers * URL : http://ismrmrd.github.io/ * License : Expat Section

Bug#790797: RFS: pyzolib/0.3.3-2

2015-07-01 Thread Ghislain Vaillant
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pyzolib" * Package name: pyzolib Version : 0.3.3-2 Upstream Author : Almar Klein * URL : https://bitbucket.org/pyzo/pyzolib * License : BSD Section

Bug#790816: RFS: roxterm/3.0.1-1

2015-07-01 Thread Tony Houghton
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roxterm" * Package name: roxterm Version : 3.0.1-1 Upstream Author : Tony Houghton * URL : http://roxterm.sourceforge.net * License : GPL2+ Sectio

Bug#790237: marked as done (RFS: netpipes/4.2-8 [RC] -- avoid FTBFS with gcc-5.)

2015-07-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 02 Jul 2015 04:26:01 + with message-id and subject line closing RFS: netpipes/4.2-8 [RC] -- avoid FTBFS with gcc-5. has caused the Debian Bug report #790237, regarding RFS: netpipes/4.2-8 [RC] -- avoid FTBFS with gcc-5. to be marked as done. This means that you claim t