Upstream release with two source packages

2015-03-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm thinking to package [1]. This package is in the github and upstream release it with two main directories: one with the C++ version (complete) and another with a python binding against the first one. The Python version cannot be built without the C++ version. Can I have in alioth a sing

Re: Upstream release with two source packages

2015-03-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > Can I have in alioth a single repo with two debian packages? How you structure the git repository doesn't have much correlation with what source/binary packages are produced. Feel free to do as you want. If you intend to produc

Bug#780069: RFS: codespell/1.7-1 ITA

2015-03-12 Thread Peter Spiess-Knafl
On 03/12/2015 05:03 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 00:30 +0100, Peter Spiess-Knafl wrote: > > > If you look at the upstream Makefile you will notice that you also > need to override dh_auto_build as the prefix is used in building > the script. > Fixed. > > That is an incorrect p

Bug#780368: RFS: pyvisa/1.6.3-1

2015-03-12 Thread Ruben Undheim
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm wondering if anyone wants to sponsor the package pyvisa? The current version in Debian is 1.4. It is therefore a major leap to 1.6.3. The current maintainer said I should take over since I'm more interested in the package than he is

Please criticize the package I have been working on, https://github.com/pelliott80/simplescreenrecorder-dpm.git

2015-03-12 Thread Paul Elliott
Please criticize the package I have been working on https://github.com/pelliott80/simplescreenrecorder-dpm.git in a git repo in dpm format. I am not the owner of the ITP bug, but the owner knows I am working on it. I plan to submit this work to the ITP bug owner. I want to get it in perfect shape

Re: Upstream release with two source packages

2015-03-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Divendres, 13 de març de 2015, a les 00:08:07, Paul Wise va escriure: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Can I have in alioth a single repo with two debian packages? > > How you structure the git repository doesn't have much correlation > with what source/b

Bug#780069: marked as done (RFS: codespell/1.7-1 ITA)

2015-03-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:58:20 +0800 with message-id <1426215500.17088.74.ca...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#780069: RFS: codespell/1.7-1 ITA has caused the Debian Bug report #780069, regarding RFS: codespell/1.7-1 ITA to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Re: Please criticize the package I have been working on, https://github.com/pelliott80/simplescreenrecorder-dpm.git

2015-03-12 Thread Riley Baird
On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:42:36 -0500 Paul Elliott wrote: > Please criticize the package I have been working on > https://github.com/pelliott80/simplescreenrecorder-dpm.git > in a git repo in dpm format. Okay, sure. I'm not a DD, so I can't sponsor your package, but I thought that I'd take a look an