Bug#768251: ITP missing for package ip2location with RFS 768251 with ITP in title

According to [0], ip2location has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 768251 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#769375: RFS: lightmdeditor/1.0-2 [ITP]

Hi Tobi, I have re-uploaded the package. The respective dsc file can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/lightmdeditor/lightmdeditor_1.0.3-1.dsc In this I have fixed lot of things. Things done: *I have changed upstream versioning to make it more debian compatible. *I ha

Bug#770449: marked as done (RFS: caml-crush/1.0.4-1 [ITP])

Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2014 20:52:44 -0400 with message-id <5490d3dc.4090...@debian.org> and subject line Re: ITP, RFS for Caml Crush package has caused the Debian Bug report #770449, regarding RFS: caml-crush/1.0.4-1 [ITP] to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#768251: ITP missing for package ip2location with RFS 768251 with ITP in title

Thanks for alerting me. I have filed the ITP bug. On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 6:15 PM, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote: According to [0], ip2location has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 768251 title. Please, could you file this ITP bug? Thanks for your work! [0] http://qa.deb