Yep, thought about it when I saw the mail on pkg-grass-devel passing by
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/cajop35nzk9isx1w7ukkfm5-frdalzyirh5kywo
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #765599,
regarding RFS: libfm/1.2.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #765600,
regarding RFS: pcmanfm/1.2.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #766116,
regarding RFS: lxlauncher/0.2.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #766115,
regarding RFS: lxinput/0.3.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:27:35 -0700
with message-id
and subject line Closing RFS bugs for uploaded packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #766117,
regarding RFS: lxtask/0.1.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Hi,
I just uploaded jmapviewer. Unfortunately the problem with gdal-grass
remains.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 08:59:21PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> Andreas Tille writes:
>
> > Hi Felix,
>
> hello Andreas,
>
> > unfortunately there is some conflict in the Build-Depe
On 10/23/2014 11:36 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10/23/2014 10:22 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:11:59PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>> Unfortunately this packages also suffers from the libjpeg62-turbo unmet
>>> build dependency, so it cannot be built at th
Hi everybody!
First, thank you for all your advices.
Can you publish the source package?
As Martin said, mysource package is available in Debian-Med [1]
> But configuring files directly to installation locations (like your
"/usr/bin") is a bad idea. This requires superuser powers
> at conf
hi,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:18 PM, wrote:
> "serverspec" is mainly used as a library (framework), not as an application,
> so "ruby-serverspec" is suitable package name for it.
> naming unification is not much important, i think.
OK, I've changed package name, and re-upload to mentors.d.o. (
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 06:26:08PM +0900, Satoru KURASHIKI wrote:
> OK, I've changed package name, and re-upload to mentors.d.o. (with
> lintian fixes).
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/serverspec-runner
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/serverspec-runner/serverspec-runner_0.2.4-1.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 02:08:51PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "wmanager". This upload
> refreshes several aspects of the Debian packaging.
>
> * Package name: wmanager
>
Hi Stefan,
Really? Preparing getdns NMU on mentors.debian.net without filling bug
reports or even notifying a maintainer?
Cheers,
--
Ondřej Surý
Knot DNS (https://www.knot-dns.cz/) – a high-performance DNS server
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
Hi Corentin!
El 24/10/14 a les 11:05, Corentin Desfarges ha escrit:
I removed lines in question and replaced them by :
configure_file("${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/bin/qt.conf"
"${CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR}/qt.conf")
(And CMAKE_CURRENT_BINARY_DIR isn't /usr/bin this time). And it works
! I mean t
Hi Ondřej,
* Ondřej Surý , 2014-10-24, 13:28:
Really? Preparing getdns NMU on mentors.debian.net without filling bug
reports or even notifying a maintainer?
Please keep in mind than debian-mentors@ is supposed to be a friendly
place to newcomers.
mentors.debian.net is not a DELAYED queue ;-
On Fri, 24 Oct 2014, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> But anyway, this workflow seems completely reasonable to me:
> 1) upload to mentors.d.n;
> 2) have someone review the changes;
> 3) have someone commit to upload the NMU;
> 4) file a bug (or post to existing bug) stating your intention to NMU.
>
> This is h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libgeotiff-dfsg"
Package name: libgeotiff-dfsg
Version : 1.4.0-4
Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam
URL : http://geotiff.osgeo.org/
License : public-domain
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "josm"
Package name: josm
Version : 0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1
Upstream Author : JOSM Developers
URL : http://josm.openstreetmap.de
License : GPL-3+
Section
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:24:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #765883,
regarding RFS: avce00/2.0.0-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:24:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #766564,
regarding RFS: prt/0.19-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "josm-plugins"
Package name: josm-plugins
Version : 0.0.svn30763+ds1-1
Upstream Author : JOSM Developers
URL : http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Plugins
License
Your message dated Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:24:54 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: jmapviewer/1.03+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #766508,
regarding RFS: jmapviewer/1.03+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "openstreetmap-map-icons"
Package name: openstreetmap-map-icons
Version : 1:0.0.svn30763-1
Upstream Author : Joerg Ostertag & Guenther Meyer
.
URL : http://wiki.op
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Control: block 739709 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk-theme-switch"
* Package name: gtk-theme-switch
Version : 2.1.0-4
Upstream Author : Denis Briand
* URL : http://gna.org/projects/gt
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:36:19PM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> Interestingly here apt reports 229 newly installed, yours one less. I've
> attached my build log for comparison.
--- libgdal-grass_1.11.1-1~exp1_amd64.build 2014-10-24 22:43:29.0
+0200
+++ libgdal-grass_1.11.1
Hi Andreas,
On 10/24/2014 06:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> * Bump JOSM dependency to 7643.
> (closes: #764176)
JOSM 7643 has hit the mirrors, so josm-plugins can be built now.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4A
On 10/24/2014 11:03 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> -Need to get 35.1 MB/116 MB of archives. After unpacking 494 MB will be used.
> -The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> - libjpeg62-turbo : Conflicts: libjpeg62 but 1:1.3.1-8 is to be installed.
> - libjpeg62 : Depends: libjpeg62-turbo (= 1:
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 00:21:47 +0200
with message-id <1414189307.31439.1.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line RFS: abcmidi/20140928-1 [ITA]
has caused the Debian Bug report #765009,
regarding RFS: abcmidi/20140928-1 [ITA]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Hi Bas,
thanks for the hint.
Do you know any method to get pinged about such updates?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:15:12AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 10/24/2014 06:54 PM, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> > * Bump JOSM dependency to 7643.
> >
On 10/25/2014 12:38 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> thanks for the hint.
>
> Do you know any method to get pinged about such updates?
Unfortunately I don't, I just periodically check the version in latest
the Packages file on the mirror.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF
Owner: -1 !
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Nicolas,
- you write in the changelog:
* Set package source format to 3.0 (native); as agreed with original
upstream author (Pedro), sleepenh is not a native Debian package
That contradicts itself! And also you package version is one of a native
ver
Many thanks James! Valid points
Ross, please also consider those comments. Especially please fix the
build system. I missed that during my review, sorry, but I will file a
bug for that.
(Also, please send your patches upstream.)
--
tobi
Am Montag, den 20.10.2014, 21:59 +0100 schrieb James Cow
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 12:49:04PM +0200, Raoul Borenius wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2014 at 05:29:43PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > Please don't use .default to control whether the daemon should be started.
>
> I searched the Debian policy but found no information how this should
> be handle
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:24:03 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #72,
regarding RFS: josm-plugins/0.0.svn30763+ds1-1 [RC]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:24:03 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30763-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #75,
regarding RFS: openstreetmap-map-icons/1:0.0.svn30763-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Sat, 25 Oct 2014 04:24:03 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: josm/0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #70,
regarding RFS: josm/0.0.svn7643+dfsg1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
36 matches
Mail list logo
